leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 03:50 PM
Original message |
| Is there any empirical evidence that ANY tenet of "conservatism" |
|
actually works? Has any example of:
smaller government lower taxes privatization deregulation reduction of civil liberties
EVER yielded a positive result for the country? Have standard of living, median wage, employment rate, GDP, the budget deficit/surplus EVER been shown to improve as a result of conservative policies?
|
ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If the concervatives actually looked for evidence they might possibly have to admit they are wrong. That's why they constantly attack academics (who might do the research). Attack the very people who might be able to document the truth and you never have to worry about the truth being beleived.
They live in a world where you form conclusions based on whatever will line your own pocket, and then make up the justifications for it.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. and they continually politicize and recalibrate |
|
official economic measures to the point that they are virtually meaningless
two clear examples are "productivity" and "unemployment"
|
ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. True. If they can change the meanings of |
|
all the indicators, without ever letting people know for sure what those indicators mean, then they can taylor the evidence to say whatever they want it too. Instant propaganda.
|
Democrats_win
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Empiricism? For Conservatives? LOL! It's ALL anecdotal! |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-28-06 03:53 PM by Democrats_win
|
quiet.american
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. I've been asking this for years. Thanks for bringing it up. n/t |
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. Well, it depends. Smaller than what? Lower than what? |
|
State-owned telephone companies, for instance, have traditionally offered some of the worst service in the history of mankind.
The real question is striking a balance--what level of government/private works and what doesn't work.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. in other words, you're saying liberalism works |
|
conservatism doesn't
conservatives gleefully embrace "smaller" to mean small enough to drown in a bathtub
conservatives apparently believe lower means zero, when it comes to taxes (at least for the uberwealthy)
|
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. The Grover Norquist model is an obvious failure. |
|
Certainly the Republican party has had very poor results when they've implemented their ideas.
|
GeorgeGist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Conservation works... but naturally the conservatives abandoned that long ago.
|
SharonAnn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. Quote I read once said "Conservatism is an attempt to justify greed" |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 19th 2013, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |