Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will it be a 51-49 Democratic Senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bob Geiger Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:17 PM
Original message
Will it be a 51-49 Democratic Senate?


Well, it's time to put my butt on the line again and give updated predictions for how the United States Senate will look after the election on November 7. Last month, I predicted a 50-50 split when all the ballots are counted -- or not counted, depending on whether or not the GOP is in charge in a given state -- and, while it seemed overly-optimistic to many, I'm sticking by that call. There's even a chance it could go to a 51-49 Democratic majority.

Here's my Reporter's Notebook (go here for all recent Senate polls):

In Arizona, Democrat Jim Pederson has consistently lagged nine to ten points behind the GOP's Jon Kyl and I don't see anything happening to change that between now and November 7. Fortunately, Democrats never really banked on this one because, at this point, Kyl will have to be caught exchanging sexy instant messages with Osama bin Laden to lose his Senate seat.

I've given up trying to figure out what's going on in Connecticut as too many polls show Ned Lamont significantly behind Joe Lieberman. My only hope is that what I keep hearing from off-the-record sources is true -- that Lieberman has more pressure to drop out being brought to bear by other Democrats than anyone realizes. But, at this point, why should he leave the race? He already knows most Democrats hate him and yet he still leads in all polls. Questions linger about whether people who say they'll vote for Lieberman when talking to pollsters will actually be moved to do that on election day and a massive get-out-the-vote effort is going to be required of Team Lamont.

Katherine Harris claims she's quietly sneaking up on Bill Nelson in Florida and will shock the world on election day. Yeah, that's the ticket. And I will soon shock all of my buddies by announcing a hot fling I'm having with Scarlett Johansson.

Republicans can give up hopes of snagging seats in Maryland and Michigan as Democrats Ben Cardin and Debbie Stabenow have opened up nine and 13-point leads, respectively, in Pollster.com's 10-poll average in each race.

Democrat Amy Klobuchar is kicking Republican Mark Kennedy's butt all over Minnesota and, by contrast, the Talent-McCaskill race in Missouri, remains tighter than Ken Mehlman's closet door.

I'm still predicting a big Jon Tester win in Montana and, despite the closeness of all polls in New Jersey, I just have a gut feeling that Garden State voters will wake up on November 7 and realize that the Republican candidate is Tom Kean Sr.'s dorky son and not the old man himself and Bob Menendez will win by much more than we think right now.

Ohio is very close and the next two weeks will be critical for the campaign of Sherrod Brown, but I'm convinced that Pollster.com's average of the last five major polls -- which shows Brown up by three points -- is about what we will see on election day.

Look out Hillary: The latest Quinnipiac poll shows Republican John Spencer pulling within 35 points. Meanwhile, in Pennsylvania, Rick Santorum prepares to start his new job as an Opus Dei lobbyist in January.

If Senate Democrats have had to endure a Republican representing Rhode Island, they couldnt have done much better than Lincoln Chafee, who votes with them more often than the likes of Democrats Ben Nelson and Ken Salazar. But it looks like Chafee's time has run out. Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse has been ahead in every major poll but one in the last three months and has a large amount of money to sustain that lead in the stretch run.

In Tennessee, whether Progressives can appreciate it or not, Harold Ford Jr. has run precisely the campaign he needs to win there -- very strong on defense and showing his conservative, blue-dog Democrat pedigree -- and the polls show it. Ford has run very effective television ads, is ahead in most polls and has a lot of cash to spend in the next three weeks.

Maria Cantwell has put the Washington state contest out of reach for Republican Mike McGavick -- she's up by an average of 11 points in the last 10 polls -- and, much to our regret, Virginia still remains a large question mark.

Democrat Jim Webb has not closed the deal with Virginia voters, despite George Felix Allen doing everything in his power to lose this race. In addition, Allen has over ten times as much money as Webb for the remaining month, which will buy a lot of nice television ads of Allen tossing a football to make voters forget that he's a Confederate flag-waving cracker.

Webb's big hope: A whopping turnout from the D.C. suburbs. Allen's wish: That educated suburban types stay home and backwoods voters turn out in droves.

My call from four weeks out: I may have seemed overly-caffeinated a month ago when I said the Senate balance would be 50-50 when this is all over, but I'm still predicting that -- and perhaps a Democratic takeover. Before counting the 10 biggest question-mark races, I have it at 48 Republican and 42 Democrat. I now strongly believe Democrats will take Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Tennessee. This brings it to 50-48 for the Democrats with the two biggest mysteries looming -- Missouri and Virginia.

If I had to bet a month of Mark Foley's teen-porn budget, I'd say that, painful as it is, Allen wins in Virginia and it becomes 50-49.

At that point, all eyes fall to Claire McCaskill in Missouri, where the race is as close as it can possibly be. Oddly enough, the passions of people either in favor of, or opposed to Missouri's stem-cell initiative may decide whether or not Democrats take back the Senate. If Democrats, steamed that Jim Talent upheld George W. Bush's veto of the national stem-cell bill, come out in large numbers, McCaskill wins. If not, Talent may squeak through for a second term.

No guts, no glory, right? I'm calling it for McCaskill and a 51-49 Democratic Senate when the 110th Congress meets in January.

If that comes true, watch for a new and improved Republican work ethic when the Senate reconvenes on November 9, as they try to pass a flurry of neocon bills before they lose power.

You can read more from Bob at BobGeiger.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sadly, trent lott will still be my senator at 7 November
Please accept my apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. It will be better than that if we can defeat Diebold nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. which races do you think we could win?
This looks like a pretty astute analysis to me. Is there polling data out there suggesting that there other races that Democrats could pick up but for voting irregularities? WHich ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope you're wrong about Felix Allen...
it's going to be close--too close I'm afraid. I'm betting a heavy turnout in the suburbs. Hopefully the Repukes will stay home and stew over their homophobia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. good analysis. One quibble
I don't think much of anything will be done in the lame duck other than pass approps bills. The Democrats will have the numbers and incentive to block any serious "neocon" bills without fear of any repercussions at the polls. Nothing will get done by unless it can be done by unanimous consent and that will mean very little can be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. The worst will be 49-49 with 2 independents, Lieberman and Sanders
Edited on Wed Oct-11-06 12:45 PM by Warpy
So unless Lieberman or Sanders swaps parties (the Pope on a pogo stick comes to mind here), the GOP will still dominate all the committees, they will not change hands in the event of a tie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheVirginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, not really
If Lieberman and Sanders caucus with the Democrats, then the power goes to the Democrats. They vote for Reid for Majority Leader, they vote for Chairmanships, etc. Its the same thing that happened in 2001 when Jeffords switched parties and gave the Democrats the majority for a year and a half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, it matters what party they represent
not who they caucus with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trapandroll Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. NJ
Agreed on NJ as it tends to break late for the left. Plus Menendez has a lot more $ than Kean Jr and he is one tough campaigner. Menendez wins by 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Oct 25th 2014, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC