Freeps: "It's time to take out all Arab states that support terrorism"

[Human Torch]

Freep-hole reactions to "Russia rules out UN sanctions against Iran"...

Russia rules out UN sanctions against Iran
Reuters - Yahoo.com ^ | 8/25/2006 | Ron Popeski - Reuters

Posted on 08/25/2006 12:46:40 PM PDT by ImpBill

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1690045/posts

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: APPEASEMENT; EZEKIEL38AND39; GOGANDMAGOG; IRAN; NUCLEARBOMB; RUSSIA; UN; WOT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I know of no instances in world practice and previous experience in which sanctions have achieved their aim and proved effective," Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov told reporters during a trip to Russia's far east. "Moreover, I believe that the question is not so serious at the moment for the U.N. Security Council or the group of six to consider any introduction of sanctions. Russia stands for further political and diplomatic efforts to settle the issue."

On the one hand, the Russian is correct. The U.N. is useless and has been for many decades now.

On the other he is just posturing to make sure their weapons deals with Iran stay in place.

I have no earthly idea why we in the US, especially our President, would even attempt to solve this impasse through the UN.

It is time to take out all Arab states that support terrorism and the insidious goals of the Islamists.

But I am not holding my breath.

Neither should any in this country. Unfortunately!

1 posted on 08/25/2006 12:46:42 PM PDT by ImpBill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: ImpBill
"I know of no instances in world practice and previous experience in which sanctions have achieved their aim and proved effective," Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov told reporters during a trip to Russia's far east.

I agree completely. Bomb them into submission.

3 posted on 08/25/2006 12:54:17 PM PDT by deaconjim
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: ImpBill

I have said it before and will say it again. China and Russia have adopted a Cold War stance. So be it. If China and Russia want to stand by while Iran obtains a nuclear weapon, then they are without doubt enabling Iran. We in turn should adopt a Cold War stance and enable Russia and China's enemies. Arms to Taiwan galore. Exapansion of Nato up to Moscow's front door with FULL deployment of mobile nuclear missle platforms. Enough of being nice.

5 posted on 08/25/2006 12:55:32 PM PDT by FlipWilson
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: ImpBill

It is time to take out all Arab states that support terrorism and the insidious goals of the Islamists.
This may be much closer than anyone realizes. Of course, I personally do not know this to be the case.

6 posted on 08/25/2006 12:58:22 PM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: FlipWilson

Right On! But as I keep asking, will we have the cajones to do it?

10 posted on 08/25/2006 1:06:18 PM PDT by ImpBill ("America ... Where are you now?")
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: FlipWilson

Or we could just eliminate their buddy Iran which would be cheaper and easier !!!

12 posted on 08/25/2006 1:10:47 PM PDT by Obie Wan

[arcane1]

1. then they all logged off and joined the military, right?

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

[gratuitous]

7. That would indeed be the day

You guys want to start a world-wide brawl against a billion people? Go right ahead. Fill out this little form of what we should do with your meager worldly possessions after your demise and off you go!

[Kagemusha]

2. Iran's largely Persian not Arab. Wonder where it fits in.

Just wondering out loud.

[w4rma]

3. Whackos. (nt)

[yellowcanine]

4. Is Iran safe from the Freepers since it is not an Arab state? If a

Freeper says something stupid and no one pays any attention is he still a looser moran?

[CottonBear]

9. No and yes.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

If a Freeper says something stupid and no one pays any attention is he still a looser moran?

[KansDem]

5. That would include Saudi Arabia and UAE...

Georgie wouldn't like that.

[proud patriot]

6. Where are they going to get the troops ?

[leesa]

12. They have this peculiar idea that we can drop bombs from thousands of feet

up and problems go away without repercussions. They actually think we can bomb Iran and get away with it, without thousands of soldiers from Iran and Syria pouring over the borders into Iraq to slaughter US soldiers in response. They are infantile in their thinking.

[proud patriot]

19. they really are a sorry lot

x(

[treestar]

8. Simple minded morans

Force is the only thing they understand.

[Kierkegaard]

10. I disagree.

They think the use of force is the answer to all their problems. They do not understand much of anything, least of all how and when to use force.

Semantics. Dontcha just love 'em? :+

[leesa]

11. Cheney sold nuclear weapons parts to Iran...should we take the US out?

The US has been supporting terrorists as long as we have existed.

[Strawman]

13. it's all just a test of our "balls" isn't it?

:sarcasm:

[alcibiades_mystery]

14. LOL: With what army?

:rofl:

[sinkingfeeling]

15. Heck, why limit ourselves to 'Arab states'? Let's just nuke the entire

planet and maybe even the moon!

[ShortnFiery]

16. Excellent News!

Then, I guess the Freepers wish to leave IRAN alone (not "take them out") because the natives there are PERSIAN. :shrug:

Silly Freeper MorAns have zero respect for complexity.

"Just point da gun and shoot those evil A-Rabs!" :P

[OregonDem]

17. All freepers are like Cheney they like sabre-rattling and acting tough

but when it comes down to it when they are asked to risk their lives, they get deferments, make excuses and discover they have anal cysts. Apparently they think the yellow ribbon on their SUV is really helping out the troops and thats all they need to contribute to a war they support.

[TechBear_Seattle]

18. What about the American states that support terrorism?

You know, American terrorism in Iraq, American terrorism in Afghanistan, American sponsored terrorism in Lebanon....

[TheWatcher]

20. I wonder how they would feel about this stance.

"It's time to take out all the people that support this murderous band of Nazis running our country."

Both stances are genocidal, but even though I could advocate neither, the interesting thing about the stance above is that, as grizzly as it is, you'd have a tough time fomenting an argument that the world would not be a better, healthier, saner, and happier place if it were to come to pass.

So dear Freepers, Looks like neither of us are realistically going to get what we want.

Y'all shut the fuck up now, y'hear?

[blm]

21. Then I guess they want CNN targeted as the House of Saud's mouthpiece.

.

[Mz Pip]

22. Worked so well for us in Iraq

didn't it Freeptards?

I wonder how they propose we pay for all those bombs, or who they plan to occupy the country with. Maybe they'll all sign up, but I'm not holding my breath.

This kind of mindset scares me - that we can solve all the world's problems with bombs. What they are4 advocating sounds like a series of Hiroshimas. These people are truly nuts.

Mz Pip
:dem: