|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| inthebrain
|
Thu Aug-10-06 04:48 PM Original message |
| Peter King just outed this whole thing on Hardball just now!!!!!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| muryan
|
Thu Aug-10-06 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. the lamont vs lieberman race |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inthebrain
|
Thu Aug-10-06 04:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Would it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muryan
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 9. I commend you for your efforts |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 17. Deleted message |
| muryan
|
Thu Aug-10-06 08:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 26. What? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inthebrain
|
Thu Aug-10-06 08:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 27. Please define conspiracy? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muryan
|
Thu Aug-10-06 08:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 28. You just defined it pretty well yourself |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inthebrain
|
Thu Aug-10-06 08:50 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 29. I dont think you know what you are talking about |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muryan
|
Fri Aug-11-06 01:53 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 34. Actually yes it is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inthebrain
|
Fri Aug-11-06 09:19 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 36. They already knew that a few weeks ago |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inthebrain
|
Thu Aug-10-06 08:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 22. Oh yes he is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AZBlue
|
Thu Aug-10-06 10:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 30. A Republican making comments that he knows will divide Dems?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eleny
|
Thu Aug-10-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 8. Lamont's numbers were excellent several weeks ago |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muryan
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. Lamont isnt that important |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eleny
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. Lamont *is* very important |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muryan
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. Thats not my point. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eleny
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 18. Lamont is important because he's given Dems a great boost |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inthebrain
|
Thu Aug-10-06 06:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 21. This is the beginning |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| leesa
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 20. But keeping the war against the Muslims going IS that important, and |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madfloridian
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 15. Yes, it is a global issue. The world has watched this one. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eleny
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 19. I remember Chris Matthews emphasizing that point this week |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eleny
|
Thu Aug-10-06 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Maybe they were saving it for October... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| notadmblnd
|
Thu Aug-10-06 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. I couldn't believe he trotted out the "see this justifies all the illegal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eleny
|
Thu Aug-10-06 04:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. Wasn't this a Pakistani/British collaboration? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| notadmblnd
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 16. that's what I thought.. but the way thier spinning it.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eleny
|
Thu Aug-10-06 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Jeez - It didn't even take 24 hours for the debunking |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| David Dunham
|
Thu Aug-10-06 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Lamont should get back from vacation ASAP to address Joe's claims |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fridays Child
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. And it will benefit Joe because, just as Bushco sold this country ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Writer
|
Thu Aug-10-06 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Lamont v. Lieberman is not the issue... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Guaranteed
|
Thu Aug-10-06 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. WHY would this benefit Lieberman? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inthebrain
|
Thu Aug-10-06 08:19 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. Follow the talking points. an example from the fishes mouth |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Doremus
|
Thu Aug-10-06 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. Snowjob also let the cat out of the bag earlier today. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Snivi Yllom
|
Thu Aug-10-06 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. would have been better for Lieberman to have gone public before the vote |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| McCamy Taylor
|
Thu Aug-10-06 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. If they wanted to help Lieberman, should have done it before. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Virginian
|
Thu Aug-10-06 11:28 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 33. That was my thought. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inthebrain
|
Fri Aug-11-06 09:14 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 35. This was known about for months |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 21st 2013, 03:59 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC