Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About that "bi-partisanship" of Joe Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:52 AM
Original message
About that "bi-partisanship" of Joe Lieberman
A troubling aspect of Senator Lieberman's political acumen are his claims about the ability to reach across the aisle in a bi-partisan way. It's painfully evident that he is blind to the game of his Rove-led friends on the Republican side: The Zero Sum Game.

Spearheaded by Newt Gingrich and cultivated under the guidance of Karl Rove, Republicans have learned that a Heads We Win, Tails You Lose gets them elected. And while Senator Lieberman decries Democrats for partisan attacks, he seems completely oblivious to the insidious tactics of Republicans. In fact, he has embraced them in word and deed.

Standing on principle is an honorable thing. No one disagrees with that. But Senator Lieberman has not made a choice to stand alone on principle. He's chosen to happily stand with elected Republicans while condemning Democratic Party rank and file...loudly and repeatedly.

Senator Lieberman needs to stop flipping the two-sided GOP coin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bi-partisan has come to mean "submission to the Prez"
and as an Indenendent, Joe will perhaps now champion "tri-partisan" efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's come to mean supplying the ink for the rubber stamp.
LOL@ "tri-partisan"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Every single Puke is partisan to the max!
I believe it was a Puke (either Rove or Norquist, perhaps) who defnied bipartisanship as something akin to date rape. Being partisan is not a bad thing if it's done on principle -- hell, it's a GOOD THING. Any Puke will tell you that.

For Joe, being bipartisan just means bending over for BushCo. And I hope to God that won't sell, come November.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's the GOPs two-sided coin
and Joe keeps flipping it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't Karl Rove call it "Date Rape"?
To my eyes, Republicans see bi-partisanship as
"You do it our way, and we will blame you when it doesn't work."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nope, it was Grover
(toward bottom of page) http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Grover_Norquist

"John Aloysius Farrell, "Rancor becomes top D.C. export: GOP leads charge in ideological war (http://tanque.org/peptide/norquist.html)," Denver Post, May 26, 2003: "'We are trying to change the tones in the state capitals - and turn them toward bitter nastiness and partisanship,' said Grover Norquist, a leading Republican strategist, who heads a group called Americans for Tax Reform.... 'Bipartisanship is another name for date rape,' Norquist, a onetime adviser to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, said, citing an axiom of House conservatives.... These days, Norquist and other conservative activists use the GOP tilt in the legislatures to make life difficult for Democratic members of Congress. On issue after issue - the war on terror, taxes, judicial appointees - Republican leaders in Washington have been getting GOP-controlled legislatures to go on record in support of Bush initiatives. It makes it more difficult for Democrats to explain unpopular votes back home."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I stand corrected
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 02:30 PM by MurrayDelph
(now only if my typing did)

Thank you. I hate being wrong (but I hate STAYING wrong more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC