Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:34 PM
Original message |
| What would Rove replacing Rummy do for our election chances? |
|
If Rove should suddenly launch the architect of the worst foreign policy disaster in US history, and replace him with some other useless partisan hack, would it be enough to make some of the wayward wingers come back to the fold?
|
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Admission of defeat and incompetence |
jedr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. One thing about this administration; |
|
Just when you think that they got rid of the worst possible person for a job, they lift a rock and find someone even worse!
|
Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
remember when we thought Powell was a disaster at State? Yipes. Although it would be hard to find someone worse than Condi.
|
Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It's a done deal at this point, IMHO. Only the BackWash still supports the clowns in office, and fucking their own children on top of the portrait of George Washington would do nothing to disuade them from voting for him. He is totally fucked up, but not nearly as fucked up as his last remaining supporters. They won't care if Rove appoints Jesus to Secretary of Killing Stuff.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Nothing will help them, I don't think. Insert Swampy 'doomed' pic! nt |
Cocoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. it would make the dems look strong on defense |
|
Bush finally does something right, and it's under pressure from the dems, while the republicans have mostly kept silent.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 25th 2013, 12:12 PM
Response to Original message |