Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tom Friedman voice of reason on MTP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:06 AM
Original message
Tom Friedman voice of reason on MTP
Edited on Sun Jul-30-06 10:12 AM by durrrty libby
Synopsis: The world hates us because of this administration

The art of diplomacy has no seat at the table of W and pals, and that is bad for the world

Israel must stop and the Arab world must build up, not tear down.

Diplomacy and listening are the priorities. Hatred and bombing

are not accomplishments.

Edited to add: Russert said Tom wrote a scathing column on w in today's
NYT. I hope someone with access will post about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. I enjoyed his discussion today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstateblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Tom Freidman said the Iraq war would solve all the problems
in the Middle East. I respected him at one time but his cheerleading for the invasion of Iraq has discredited him as a clear thinker. Funny how he didn't even mention how the Iraq war has figured into creating instability in the region. He wants to have it both ways- screw Tom Freidman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yeah the Iraq War and "Free Trade"....
but today he did make a lot of sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He does seem bi-polar, but today he must have been
on the good meds.

Maybe he's had a change of heart.Who knows, but at this point, I'll support anyone reasonable

because reason is such a rare commodity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeachBuckeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Friedman, the every 6 months guy
Every 6 months he has a new take on Iraq. He's been all over the place and his opinions on the subject are meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. That may be, but today the discussion was not Iraq,
but Israel and Lebanon.

On this subject he came across quite reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Do you think Friedman is turning the corner?
Or will the next six months be a critical phase for forming Friedman's opinions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. In fairness, his biggest cheerleading came after we were in
I see that he sees the world, as a novelist would want to write it. He starts where we are and tries to suggest "a plot" where this could end up all having been for the best. (On Iraq, he is toning the "all for the best" down a little.) He is a columnist, so this is his right to do. With his expertise, it's too bad that he's not simply a reporter.

One example was a column, in either November or December, that I think he titled "Crazy like a fox". This was when the inspectors were in and had access even to the presidential palaces and Saddam had agreed to and was participating in destroying some missiles - his top technology - because they were on the border line of legality. (They went too far if they had no warheads - if war heads were added they would go less far.) Freidman suggested Bush was acting crazy to get Saddam to move in the right direction. His view was that by leveraging the view that he could attack Iraq, he was getting results that neither his dad or Clinton got.

In reality, Bush was not acting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmunchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Friedman said one really good thing, that Bushco was really good at break
ing things. "If you want things broke Bush is the goto guy" or something like that. He hasn't been too swift on his ideas about Iraq. It is just that he is opening his eyes FINALLY so many others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. When Tom Friedman starts to sound reasonable, I get worried.
Edited on Sun Jul-30-06 10:37 AM by Benhurst
I'm worried. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. We've passed Way the fuck over into Bizarro World if HE is beginning
to "sound reasonable".

Move over. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Efilroft Sul Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. Friedman: The Mustache of Reason.
I forget who said that, but it always cracks me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. can't stand the guy.
he is a globalism supporter -- and supported the war in iraq.

so now these people who have come over to the side of people who opposed the war from the git-go are more respected?

fuck that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. He ignored the idea of dialog
when it was promoted by General Clark. Hey, maybe next week Joe Biden will tell us the same thing. Chris Cillizi can rave about what a foreign policy guru ol' Joe is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. amazing isn't it?
the staus quo johnny come latelys to what the left has been trying -- eloquently i might add -- to tell people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Status suck ups
I'm really ripped today...over the edge. Thousands of people of dying because of bush's failed, destined to fail from April 02 when the plan surfaced, foreign policy. So what do these goons do: they start spouting the words of people they once scorned as if they suddenly had a brain storm.

Oh...and even after everything, they have nerve to call us radical. F'k em.

This is all a piece ya know. If Iran hadn't been strengthened by our illegal invasion of Iraq, we would not be watching this carnage today. Don't worry, they'll rescue bush...ya know, he'll be manly once more.

What really worries me is that the moves on the chess board are becoming fewer and fewer. Would bush try to save his bacon by invading Iran?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. if i may -- for the sake of conversation -- people = mines.
then can't we reasonably say -- what with the economy, or our murderous foreign policy, corporate malfeasance -- that the people who represent the concentrated political wisdom in this country are played out?

mind you -- i'm throwin bill clinton on that heap along with bush, condi, cheney, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Arab t.v. is the MUSAC of the Arab world".What'd he mean by that comment?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Arab t.v. is the MUSAC of the Arab world".
I think he meant it was on 24/7 and available everywhere.

LIke sunshine, it seeps into one's pores, without one being aware of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. So, what is our muzak?
For far too many people, it is Fox and hate radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Thanks. He gave me the impression that people in the arab world
were walking around like zombies.Your explanation clears it up a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. You could make the argument that millions of Americans are
After all, a preceding post did mention Fox "News" and hate radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. Friedman's greatest pleasure
Often Friedman, who thinks that he knows best, enjoys no greater pleasure than listening to sound of his own voice. If he thinks "musac" makes him sound oh so cool, he doesn't care what it means. In this case, the phrase is rather demeaning to the Arab world, and would imply the corollary, that somehow that outside the Arab world, people are listening to more substantial information. It is only when the reality of American cable news strikes, that Friedman's statements are shown as silly. The musac-news award would easily go to any American station. Witness: 50% of America now believes that we found WMD in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Tom typically 20 years out of date in his analysis and analogies
As if anyone in the West has heard anything like Muzack since 1986...:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diddlysquat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. His article is posted in EDITORIALS
Edited on Sun Jul-30-06 11:02 AM by hawthorne17
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Thanks for the link
Read his column people. He got this right

"Ihe world hates George Bush more than any U.S. president in my lifetime. He is radioactive - and so caught up in his own ideological bubble that he is incapable of imagining or forging alternative strategies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Friedman looked rational because Israel's ambassador was on first
on MTP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. Thanks for pointing that out
Propaganda works on many levels. I was casually monitoring the time allowed for the two ambassadors. Israel's 20 min. Lebanon's 7 min.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC