Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elective Dictatorship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:24 PM
Original message
Elective Dictatorship
Our President Seeks Dictatorial Power...

The Power-Madness of King George
Is Bush turning America into an elective dictatorship?
By Jacob Weisberg
Slate Magazine
Posted Wednesday, Jan. 25, 2006, at 3:44 PM ET


It's tempting to dismiss the debate about the National Security Agency spying on Americans as a technical conflict about procedural rights. President Bush believes he has the legal authority to order electronic snooping without asking anyone's permission. Civil libertarians and privacy-fretters think Bush needs a warrant from the special court created to authorize wiretapping in cases of national security. But in practice, the so-called FISA court that issues such warrants functions as a virtual rubber stamp for the executive branch anyhow, so what's the great difference in the end?

Would that so little were at stake. In fact, the Senate hearings on NSA domestic espionage set to begin next month will confront fundamental questions about the balance of power within our system. Even if one assumes that every unknown instance of warrant-less spying by the NSA were justified on security grounds, the arguments issuing from the White House threaten the concept of checks and balances as it has been understood in America for the last 218 years. Simply put, Bush and his lawyers contend that the president's national security powers are unlimited. And since the war on terror is currently scheduled to run indefinitely, the executive supremacy they're asserting won't be a temporary condition.

This extremity of Bush's position emerges most clearly in a 42-page document issued by the Department of Justice last week. As Andrew Cohen, a CBS legal analyst, wrote in an online commentary, "The first time you read the 'White Paper,' you feel like it is describing a foreign country guided by an unfamiliar constitution." To develop this observation a bit further, the nation implied by the document would be an elective dictatorship, governed not by three counterpoised branches of government but by a secretive, possibly benign, awesomely powerful king.
Click Here!

According to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, the putative author of the white paper, the president's powers as commander in chief make him the "sole organ for the Nation in foreign affairs." This status, which derives from Article II of the Constitution, brings with it the authority to conduct warrant-less surveillance for the purpose of disrupting possible terrorist attacks on the United States.

...


Such a blatant anti-Democracy operation by the White House should rouse every citizen in this country to demand the current Administration be clapped in irons and prosecuted for treason. Even shrinking from what ought to be done, the very least that must be done is to demand, in no uncertain terms, that "our" Congress actually perform it's oversight duties and put a stop to this dictatorial expansion of Executive power!

Considering that Bush is now turning to Congress to enable him to continue his bid to expand his oppressive powers! Not only must they not support him, they need to act to further reign him in! The Republican Congress appears likely to give Bush what he wants--we can't stand idly by and let our Congress do this!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah, all except the "elective" part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, the "elective" is questionable.
And the "dictatorship" only extends to national security issues, so far, but I guess if Dear Leader decides we need to privitize Social Security to stop the terrorists, we have to go along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Naw, they definitely want to keep up the pretense of elections... nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Even Saddam Hussein Had Elections. So Did Stalin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Actually Dick (mien kampf) Cheney is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Tsk. Pseudo-elective oligarchy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC