Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just found a GOP talksheet on CA-50, interesting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:05 AM
Original message
I just found a GOP talksheet on CA-50, interesting
NRCC's Message On CA 50

From their memo to "GOP friends" (i.e. talking points):
Update: With 90.2% of the precincts reporting, Republican Brian Bilbray leads Democrat Francine Busby by 4,814 votes - 49.5% to 45.2%. The Associated Press has called the race for Brian Bilbray.
In San Diego County (of which the 50th District is a part) there are about 40,000 absentee ballots remaining to be counted today, as well as over 14,000 provisional ballots. So it will be at least this afternoon before we have final results.
Note: Brian Bilbray also won the GOP primary last night for the right to face Democrat Francine Busby on the ballot in November.
The following post-election analysis may be helpful to you as you discuss the race and its implications:
Ø A Democrat “Culture of Corruption” Defeat – There are no moral victories in politics. A loss, is a loss, is a loss. Democrats lost the election despite the heavy emphasis they placed on ethics and corruption in this race, and the fact that Francine Busby ran for this seat nonstop for almost 2-1/2 years. Busby has now failed three times in 19 months to put CA-50 in the Democrat column.
Ø Democrats Failed to Capitalize on a Friendly Environment. A loss does not create a shockwave. Not only did National Democrats lose in a district where the right track/wrong track has plummeted in recent months, they also failed to take advantage of an environment as friendly to their "culture of corruption" argument as they are going to find: the GOP incumbent resigned and then went to jail while the Republican candidate to succeed him was a lobbyist.
Ø This Was a Team Effort. The NRCC spent just over $4.5 million on voter contact. The Administration was very helpful – President Bush, First Lady Laura Bush and Vice President Cheney all recorded GOTV phone calls and Vice President Cheney hosted a fundraiser. The RNC organized the Election Day GOTV operation. Senator McCain was a big help as well, hosting a fundraiser and recording both a radio ad and a GOTV phone call.
Ø The NRCC's Commitment to This Race Made the Difference. The NRCC spent what it took to win. The NRCC ran an extensive voter contact program including: absentee ballot program, television, direct mail, phone calls, and radio.
Ø Special Elections Are Unique. It is no surprise that this was a close race. Historically, the results of special elections do not always reflect a district's traditional profile.
THE LANDSCAPE
Ø The Candidates – Democrats effectively attacked Congressman-elect Brian Bilbray for being a lobbyist as well as for being a former Member of Congress who missed votes to travel on junkets. All this in a district where the former Member went to jail for being bribed by a lobbyist. This was a very effective attack for the Democrats.
At the same time Francine Busby was attacked for her pro-amnesty position on immigration and for her position in favor of tax increases – both not wanting to make the Bush tax cuts permanent and her past support for increasing the gas tax.
Ø The Environment – There was significant erosion in the overall environment during the course of this campaign. Since March, the right track / wrong track numbers went from 33-59 to 23-70.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Ø Local Issues Made The Difference. National issues were not a factor in this race. While Francine Busby and National Democrats concentrated their efforts on attacking Brain Bilbray as a lobbyist, it was Busby’s positions on immigration and taxes that were the main focal points for Bilbray and anti-Busby voters.
Ø Campaigns Matter. Despite having the more effective attacks and a very favorable environment, the Democrats couldn’t win the race. This campaign proved that in competitive House races, despite the environment, voters will be forced to focus on the choice between the two individuals on the ballot.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yep especially since some of these talking points
were used the day after in DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. excuse me?
I must have missed something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think that nadinbrzezinski's point is that
the RW talking points are shilled here on DU by people pretending to be friendlies, to get us to buy into the defeatist mindset.

The response is meant to reinforce your point, not undermine it.

Rec'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. You missed it
somebody yesterday was gonig on and on and on over how this district was on a platter and we should have won.. he \she would not listen to any reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes. There are certainly some conservative shills running around.
Check out the Choice board. There are three very near the top.

You are not a rethug shill. We know that! Don't worry! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I thought it was interesting to see how they think.
According to them, we should win every seat because they are so ****ed up nationally. so, they say keep campaigns to only local issues, because otherwise the democrats win.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's always good to know what the other side it doing.
We need to use that knowledge to deliver victories to our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC