Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ned Lamont socks it to Lieberman - A+ video

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 10:33 PM
Original message
Ned Lamont socks it to Lieberman - A+ video
http://www.nedlamont.com/page/invite/ctgwdvd

Ned Lamont for U.S. Senate Introduction Video



Three months ago, Ned Lamont began the kind of campaign entrenched DC power-brokers fear and beyond-the-beltway Democrats recognize as the only way to reclaim our country for ordinary Americans. This video introduces you to Ned, contains interviews with many Connecticut voters, and information on the actions and positions of Senator Lieberman. Now we need your help to spread the word to your friends and family.

Podcast - http://www.nedlamont.com/page/file/c0239b3cf0dd46795c_mlbl0up5s.mp4/Ned_Clean_Podcast_final.mp4

Windows - http://www.nedlamont.com/page/stream/d956108106151064f5_mlbze34wp.wmv/Ned_Windows.asx

Quicktime - http://www.nedlamont.com/page/stream/808cf460b039bf38ae_mlbral8wv.mov/Ned_streaming_final.mov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
killerbush Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lieberman socks it to Lamont in the polls
Which is what counts in the first place right??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe in the first place
But it's not over until the fat lady sings.

I'm an eternal optomist. I believe that Lamont can and will inspire 50% +1 to win the Democratic primary election.

I detest anyone who believes that entrenched and undserving DINO's should automatically receive the nod just because they are an incumbent. When elected they serve for a TERM. When that term is over, the playing field should be level and all players enter on even footing (campaign warchests aside). All should run on merits, not "political capital".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killerbush Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The fat lady began singing months ago.
Turn out the lights, the party's over!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. and Joe's best friend Sean Hannity
is really happy about that.

But he hasn't heard from ol' Joe in a while. I wonder why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. My support for Lieberman is long over.
I'm an Orthodox Jew, just like Lieberman, but I do care about a lot of things here in the United States, rather than Israel. Lieberman's comment about rape victims having to find another hospital to get pills to prevent impregnation has drove me over the edge. He's lost it, and doesn't deserve my support. As a result, I have donated $250 to Ned Lamont to soundly defeat this incorrigable piece of shit that's shaming Orthodoxy Jewry in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nice op-ed piece today from Weicker, too.
I miss Lowell Weicker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killerbush Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Does Weicker still have egg on his suit??
And the thought of Neddie Lamont getting 50%+1 of the vote is laughable. In the immortal words of Howard Cunningham, "when pigs fly".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Doesn't change the fact that Joe undermines the democrats on the war
And severely diminishes our chances of winning elections by distinguishing ourselves from the Republicans on that issue. Lieberman may be polling better than Lamont but that doesn't mean that he's better for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killerbush Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. He is better for the job
And when all is said and done, he'll still have his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Why is he better for the job?
Because he's pro-war?
Because he's anti-abortion?
Because he's super nice with Bush?
Or some other right-wing-ness of him I'm unaware of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'm missing the reference to egg...
but I've always loved Weicker. Voted for him instead of Lieberman, in fact. Voted for him and Eunice for Gov. and Lt. Gov., too.

It would be nice if at the least this primary battle put some fear in Lieberman and reminded him he's supposed to be a Democrat. And that his constituents don't appreciate his fawning over Bush. And that paying a bit of attention to the needs of CT, and less attention to the career progress of Joe Lieberman would be smart in the long-run.

I've never been a Lieberman fan. To be honest, he really lost me years ago, when he hemmed and hawed and waited until it was too late to cast his vote on Thomas. Coward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killerbush Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'll eplain the egg incident
A few years ago, the people of Connecticut were mad at Weicker for proposing an income tax because the governor before him, stripped the coffers bare. I remember Weicker walking through the crowd, and he was spit on, called all sorts of nasty names, and someone even threw an egg, and hit him on the chest. I look back on that now, and thought Weicker was stupid then for walking into an angry mob, and he's just as stupid today for backing a certain loser in Lamont. Sometimes he just doesn't figure things out does he?? I personally think old Lowell is still upset that Lieberman beat him for reelection back in 1988.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GymGeekAus Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. If winning is everything....
Then you're in the wrong party. Tp what lengths will you go to win?

Long story short: As long as Lieberman continues to stand with the corporate interest and supports this illegal and bigoted war, I'll keep sending money to Lamont.

If this primary actually becomes a referendum on the character of the politicians, Lamont will win in a landslide. If it really does all boil down to money, then our Democracy is lost already.

You can't compete with the rich when it comes to money. That's why we have a Constitution and a vote in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. By your reasoning
The Democratic Party shouldn't field a candidate for Governor in Texas. Do you agree with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I remember the anger over the income tax
Although I think he was absolutely right. And then had to watch his hard-bought fiscal sanity ruined by Rowland's profligacy.

I just don't see it as a stupid thing to back Lamont. First of all, there's no way he'd back Lieberman -- perhaps as you say, for personal reasons. That was a pretty darned nasty fight, as I recall. But secondly, and I know I sound like a broken record, there's a good reason to send a strong message to Lieberman. I think he's gotten pretty big for those britches, VP and all. His totally out of touch, totally unapologetic stance on Iraq, and on Bush just screams "you can't touch me, Democrats, and I don't give a damn what you think!"

Look, should he win the primary, I certainly won't be voting Republican. But I won't be voting with much enthusiasm in that race, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Oh my Goodness! Loved it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC