AOL on Al Gore: Will He Run Again? (vote here)

[Us vs Them]

http://news.aol.com/dailypulse/050806/_a/will-he-run-again/20060508101609990001?ncid=NWS00010000000001

Everyone needs to take a second to cast a vote for Al.

[OwnedByFerrets]

1. I was really surprised at

the results. Hell, he won the first time he ran.:shrug:

[Us vs Them]

2. Me too. That's why I posted it here

However, in 20,000+ hits since I last cheked it, nothing has changed!

[American liberal]

3. AOL News ... Think about it. Who uses AOL anymore? Rich repubs

who are technophobes? What do YOU think?

[orleans]

4. he shouldn't run and neither should she

they have too much baggage and we can't afford to lose

we need a candidate who hasn't been smeared, who the pukes are gonna have a hard time smearing--with gore & clinton all the repukes have to do is pull some of their old bullshit out of their ass.

i say no to gore & clinton

(not this time--too much to lose)

[AndyTiedye]

5. Nobody Could Have Been Harder to Smear Than Kerry

If they've got absolutely nothing, even with all the snoops in the NSA working for them they make shit up.

[Baconfoot]

6. They can lie about anyone, just like they lied about Gore and Kerry

We shouldn't make our decisions regarding who to nominate based on who they can most easily smear. For goodness sake, look what they did to McCain in the primary.

Smearability is a non-issue due to the lying factor.

If electibility is your concern, smearability shouldn't be.

Preexisting loathing might be a concern and there Gore has miles of advantage over Clinton. People wish they had voted for Gore. People wish they would never hear about Clinton again.

[JNelson6563]

7. R's or other Dem candidate zealots are hammering it

:kick: