Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Urgent: This Is It For Offshore Wind Energy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 01:48 PM
Original message
Urgent: This Is It For Offshore Wind Energy


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Urgent: This Is It For Offshore Wind Energy
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:45:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Greenpeace <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: xxxx

Greenpeace

Dear xxx
21 April 2006
Save Cape Wind

Urgent Action >> Call on Congress to
Save Cape Wind 1-866-200-7070
Last week, I wrote to you about a back-door deal in Congress that's threatening to destroy America's first offshore wind project. Already nearly 18,000 of you have recognized the urgency of this situation and taken action. Thank you. But there's more to do and we can't stop now.

While you're paying close to $3.00 a gallon at the gas pump, Congress is secretly trying to kill big oil's competition, and only YOU can help us fight back.

Right now, the Senate holds the key to keeping offshore wind energy alive, so your senators need to hear from you TODAY.

Call 1-866-200-7070 now and we'll connect you instantly to your senators' offices, and provide you with exactly what you'll need to say to convince them to save the Cape Wind project.

Please, less than five minutes of your time could make a real difference in the future of renewable energy in our country, so take action.

After you've made the call, watch this great video and pass it along to all your friends and family - ask them to make a call too.

Thank you for all you have done,
Kate Smolski
Kate Smolski
Clean Energy/Cape Wind Campaigner

P.S. We need all the help we can get, so please, forward this message to every friend, family member, and coworker you have, and ask them to take action too. There's no better way I can think of to celebrate Earth Day and make a real difference.

702 H Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20001
(800) 326-0959

Did you know?
Next Wednesday marks the 20th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. This issue has made strange bedfellows...
I read in this morning's Anchorage Daily News that Ted Stevens and Don Young of Alaska have joined with Ted Kennedy to oppose this project. I'm highly confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I seem to recall that Walter Cronkite was also against the project
He lives out there also and has a big sailboat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think they are want to put the windmills a couple of miles out.
Not ban the whole project. I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I saw a report on TV a year or two ago that said the windmills would
be way out to sea. I'm not sure if it was a couple of miles or not, but the windmills would look pretty tiny from land. (They had some simulations)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. What exactly is an "offshore" wind project?
I don't know what this means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmkinsey Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's windmills to generate electricity
they want to put them in the water off Martha's Vineyard.
The locals are generally opposed to it on aesthetic grounds. Therefore their Senator is representing them and opposing it.
I imagine Sen Stevens is against it because it cuts into the extraction industries profits.

Windmills are not popular among people who live near them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ah, thanks
When I see "offshore" I think outsourcing.

California has a lot of windmill fields in big, windy stretches of land where there is no development. I guess not every state is fortunate enough to have that kind of open space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here is the address of the video
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC