|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| dajoki
|
Sun Apr-02-06 08:53 PM Original message |
| The let-Bush-be-Bush strategy; they have little left to lose. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| |
TOJ | Apr-02-06 08:56 PM | #1 |
| |
dajoki | Apr-02-06 08:57 PM | #2 |
| |
rpannier | Apr-02-06 10:09 PM | #11 |
| |
dajoki | Apr-02-06 10:28 PM | #12 |
| |
calimary | Apr-03-06 02:42 AM | #14 |
| |
yellowcanine | Apr-02-06 08:57 PM | #3 |
| |
TOJ | Apr-02-06 09:00 PM | #4 |
| |
rpannier | Apr-02-06 09:00 PM | #5 |
| |
yardwork | Apr-02-06 09:01 PM | #6 |
| |
dajoki | Apr-02-06 09:13 PM | #8 |
| |
AndyA | Apr-02-06 09:09 PM | #7 |
| |
Supersedeas | Apr-03-06 10:30 AM | #15 |
| |
Jack Rabbit | Apr-02-06 09:18 PM | #9 |
| |
Canuckistanian | Apr-02-06 09:25 PM | #10 |
| |
Joe Turner | Apr-02-06 10:39 PM | #13 |
| |
dbaker41 | Apr-03-06 11:20 AM | #16 |
| |
dajoki | Apr-03-06 09:05 PM | #17 |
| |
radio4progressives | Apr-03-06 11:30 PM | #18 |
| |
dajoki | Apr-04-06 12:40 PM | #21 |
| |
susu369 | Apr-04-06 06:25 AM | #19 |
| |
Javaman | Apr-04-06 10:39 AM | #20 |
| |
dajoki | Apr-04-06 12:41 PM | #22 |
| Doctor_J
|
Sun Apr-02-06 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Yup, he got "elected" by being stupid, so he's going |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dajoki
|
Sun Apr-02-06 08:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. I still wouldn't have a beer with him n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rpannier
|
Sun Apr-02-06 10:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 11. That's okay cuz... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dajoki
|
Sun Apr-02-06 10:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. LOL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| calimary
|
Mon Apr-03-06 02:42 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 14. Besides, where is the wisdom in liking a dry drunk because he'd |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| yellowcanine
|
Sun Apr-02-06 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. This new strategery is bound to be great for Letterman et al. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Doctor_J
|
Sun Apr-02-06 09:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. He won't be unscripted |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rpannier
|
Sun Apr-02-06 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Topic DuJour...Kinda like "DuFus" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| yardwork
|
Sun Apr-02-06 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. They have no other option....besides, he's washed up |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dajoki
|
Sun Apr-02-06 09:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. yes... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AndyA
|
Sun Apr-02-06 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. It comes across as flippant to me. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Supersedeas
|
Mon Apr-03-06 10:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 15. Exactly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jack Rabbit
|
Sun Apr-02-06 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Let Bush be Bush? Oh, boy!! Bring it on!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Canuckistanian
|
Sun Apr-02-06 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Stupidity as a virtue |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe Turner
|
Sun Apr-02-06 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Let Shithead be Shithead? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bake
|
Mon Apr-03-06 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 16. Soundsl like an EXIT strategy to me! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dajoki
|
Mon Apr-03-06 09:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 17. exit from the WH n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| radio4progressives
|
Mon Apr-03-06 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Schumer Lead Boycott on Feingold's Censure Hearing... (links) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dajoki
|
Tue Apr-04-06 12:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 21. thank you |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| susu369
|
Tue Apr-04-06 06:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. "I'm the funny guy." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Javaman
|
Tue Apr-04-06 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. but doesn't that concept confirm just completely |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dajoki
|
Tue Apr-04-06 12:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 22. that's what i'm hoping n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 24th 2013, 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC