Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why no outrage over this port deal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
djg21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:14 AM
Original message
Why no outrage over this port deal?
no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd
Friday March 24, 11:51 am ET
By Ted Bridis and John Solomon, Associated Press Writers
U.S. to Contract Hong Kong Firm to Help Scan for Nuclear Materials Passing From Bahamas to U.S.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- One of Americans' favorite beach destinations, the Bahamas, is getting a new U.S. arrival -- sophisticated equipment to detect radioactive materials in shipping cargo.

But U.S. customs agents won't be on site to supervise the machine's use as a nuclear safeguard for the American shoreline that is just 65 miles away from Freeport. Under an unusual arrangement, a Hong Kong company will help operate the detector.

The Bush administration says it is finalizing a no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. It acknowledged the deal is the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.


This is incredibly scary! The story continues:


its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years.

"Li Ka-Shing is pretty close to a lot of senior leaders of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party," said Larry M. Wortzel, head of a U.S. government commission that studies China security and economic issues. But Wortzel said Hutchison operates independently from Beijing, and he described Li as "a very legitimate international businessman."

"One can conceive legitimate security concerns and would hope either the Homeland Security Department or the intelligence services of the United States work very hard to satisfy those concerns," Wortzel said.

Three years ago, the Bush administration effectively blocked a Hutchison subsidiary from buying part of a bankrupt U.S. telecommunications company, Global Crossing Ltd., on national security grounds.

And a U.S. military intelligence report, once marked "secret," cited Hutchison in 1999 as a potential risk for smuggling arms and other prohibited materials into the United States from the Bahamas.

Hutchison's port operations in the Bahamas and Panama "could provide a conduit for illegal shipments of technology or prohibited items from the West to the PRC (People's Republic of China), or facilitate the movement of arms and other prohibited items into the Americas," the now-declassified assessment said.


And Schumer's comments:

"Giving a no-bid contract to a foreign company to carry out the most sensitive security screening for radioactive materials at ports abroad raises many questions," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.


After the UAE Ports debacle, you'ld think this no-bid contract would be a non-starter!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. If Clinton was giving China top secret technology like this, they'd
be screaming bloody blue murder. Especially since our custom agents aren't allowed to be around. Way to go, dumbasses! Sell the country's safety down the toilet so you can sell your widgets to the biggest market in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. it is building like the last one did.
That one took a few weeks also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think you are right, Izzie
I too have been ignoring this story and when I read your comment I realized that I am worn out after the Dubai (spell?) thing and am not ready to deal with another of this administration's screwed up policies. Why are they so insistent on having other countries be in charge of our security? I really don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I hate to look at the stock and CEO's pay but it is place to start..
I wish I could find the old time paper on one of our 'founders' saying that this is what would take the country down. Special interest. We were drilled in Am. gov. when I was in high school and Jr. high and I swear I read it back in those days (late 40's and 50's) but it has been so many years ago I just can not find it, or drag it out of my mind. I once had to do a paper on Madison so I will be looking over him soon. I just can not let a subject go at times. Maybe it was in the Federalist Papers. I really liked the subject but the teacher was so scary and I did not dare not to do my home work each night. I recall how bills went through Congress almost having me up a wall. Do school still do that subject? Civics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. It hasn't gotten enough media coverage yet. But just wait......
Lou Dobbs is already on it. He'll have them on the cross by next Friday!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Has ANYONE looked at a map of our ports recently to see.......
....how many are truly US controlled and how many are foreign controlled. Try as you may to find even one that is completely and totally US controlled and you'd be hard pressed to find even one.:think: I've seen such a map on CNN (I think it was CNN) and both coasts are almost entirely foreign controlled.:shrug:

Is that right in my view - no - but facts are facts. IMHO at the very least the Chinese, N Koreans, and Middle East should not control a one of our ports.:eyes:

What I want to know why the Chinese will be building/controlling computers our government uses.:wtf: That is so much more of a threat - a little change here and there and we'd be royally screwed, as if we aren't already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. * has made any ties of China to 9-11 - yet. We have to wait until
it our turn to invade them. Which would make most of the American people sheeple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC