|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
stickdog
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:11 AM Original message |
| Exactly when does "incompetence" stop being a credible excuse? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
KnaveRupe
(700 posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Nice, comprehensive list. Recommended. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| acmavm
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Recommended it myself. But truthfully, it is not a credible excuse. That's |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprehensor
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. It's as plain as day. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. Wow, compounded thought AND binary logic! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:49 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. Nope. It's just not believable that it's TYPICALLY incompetence. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. That's fair enough. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| izzie
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. We have 5000 years of this in some places. So? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:58 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 9. Your post got me thinking. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| izzie
|
Fri Mar-24-06 07:31 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. Have they ever figured out the Germans and Hitler? ANd what |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cactusrose
(59 posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 09:52 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 17. It's the enablers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| izzie
|
Fri Mar-24-06 04:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 24. but of course these people always stick with their like. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cactusrose
(59 posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 09:45 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 16. Good question! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| glitch
|
Fri Mar-24-06 10:46 AM Response to Reply #16 |
| 21. Welcome to DU - these are good questions. I think if the 2000 bush voters |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 03:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 23. I've thought about this a lot and even asked many Bush supporters |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-25-06 08:13 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 33. De Tocqueville figured it out |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Backlash Cometh
|
Fri Mar-24-06 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 11. If Bush were serving on the bench, he'd be removed. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 08:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. Imagine if he were a doctor. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
|
Fri Mar-24-06 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. I stopped the day I concluded it was *IHOP. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cactusrose
(59 posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 10:09 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 18. That's a key - the PNAC |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| specimenfred1984
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. Fantastic List! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| quaoar
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. Add a new one to your list |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 11:47 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 22. Yep. As Lily Tomlin says ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. Coincidence Theory plus Incompetence Theory |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| C_U_L8R
|
Fri Mar-24-06 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. It's at least CRIMINAL incompetence |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Psyclops Skydog
(1 posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. nice list for a Dukie |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-25-06 12:54 AM Response to Reply #25 |
| 27. What about that UConn goaltending scandal! (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Mar-27-06 12:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 36. Hi Psyclops Skydog!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RazzleDazzle
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Mar-24-06 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. Fabulouse work. Wish I could say the same for Dems in Congress |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-25-06 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 28. Incompetence is not inconsistent with profound evil. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cassiepriam
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-25-06 05:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 29. For themselves they are brilliant, for any one else, the could care less |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-25-06 05:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 30. Incompetence becomes criminal when it leads to negligent injury |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW
|
Sat Mar-25-06 06:04 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 31. John Ashcroft was Attorney General |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-25-06 07:20 AM Response to Reply #31 |
| 32. Great list. Thanks. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Mar-25-06 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 34. Listen, pal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Mar-26-06 12:46 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 35. Brilliant. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Nov 22nd 2009, 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC