|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| ProSense
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:10 AM Original message |
| White House wants U.S. partner in ports deal (GUESS WHO?) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| postulater
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Could that have been the agenda all along? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sensitivity
|
Sat Mar-04-06 09:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 34. Someone has been PAYING for the Ports Deal to be spun in a |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nadinbrzezinski
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Gee golly, what a SHOCKING SURPRISE! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WePurrsevere
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 11. Yeah really. Pick me off of the floor and color me totally surprised.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| morningglory
|
Sat Mar-04-06 02:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 24. Just shoot me in the head with a load of birdshot not, please! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TaleWgnDg
|
Sun Mar-05-06 01:12 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 38. Indeed! Halliburton, how utterly S H O C K I N G . . . n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| salin
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. I miss the days when I had never heard of Halliburton. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Botany
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. This deal was done to make money for bush buddies .... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mia
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. Just rename the country U.S.H |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| notadmblnd
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. This was predicted here over a week ago. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arkansas Granny
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:21 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. Yep. Many of us here figured that Halliburton would gain from |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tulsakatz
|
Sat Mar-04-06 11:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 21. true, it's all about money... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fridays Child
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. I predicted this on February 17. Look... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cobalt Violet
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. Why don't we all just sign our paychecks over to Halliburton now? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| liberal N proud
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. And the shit continues to pile up! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Daphne08
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. WHAT? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| adriennui
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:27 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. why am i not surprised? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Daphne08
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:35 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 16. Well, now that I've picked myself off the floor... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pachamama
|
Sat Mar-04-06 05:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 28. Daphne - if we walked down the street together, they'd think we were |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FreedomAngel82
|
Sat Mar-04-06 05:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 27. But you have to remember |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BR_Parkway
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. Before I even clicked thru - so, why is THAT company the only |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ProSense
|
Sun Mar-05-06 07:56 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 43. Great point! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BR_Parkway
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. We're not surprised - but average Joe will be, if the M$M gets the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fridays Child
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 17. The bushbots over at freepturdland who have been conflicted by this... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Minnesota Libra
|
Sat Mar-04-06 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
| 18. It was a given - from day one - that........ |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Donailin
|
Sat Mar-04-06 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. And there it is. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DarleenMB
|
Sat Mar-04-06 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. Well I'm just stunned. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Backlash Cometh
|
Sat Mar-04-06 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. Oh, my God, Oh, my God, Oh, my God, Oh, my God, Oh, my God. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pachamama
|
Sat Mar-04-06 05:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 25. OMG! OMG! OMG! As I opened the post & saw the header, I said to myself |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sensitivity
|
Sat Mar-04-06 07:14 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 31. Halliburton Ripp-off Artists to IMPROVE security of #1 World Port Operator |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Julius Civitatus
|
Sat Mar-04-06 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. Surprise, surprise!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FreedomAngel82
|
Sat Mar-04-06 05:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 29. Exactly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FreedomAngel82
|
Sat Mar-04-06 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. Oh of course! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| druidity33
|
Sat Mar-04-06 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. heh heh... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lerkfish
|
Sat Mar-04-06 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. Just as I predicted. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Wordie
|
Sat Mar-04-06 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. I didn't even need to read your OP to know. Recommended, sadly. :( |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wisteria
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. This is all so sad, when will this nightmare end! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fooj
|
Sat Mar-04-06 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. What a fucking surprise! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| arikara
|
Sun Mar-05-06 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 37. Its unanimous |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rpannier
|
Sun Mar-05-06 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 39. I'm not surprised |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sensitivity
|
Sun Mar-05-06 09:38 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 46. Of course. Call the PNAC "Security" rule -- we are secure when U.S. Rules |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Robeson
|
Sun Mar-05-06 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 40. There's no shame in their game. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| orleans
|
Sun Mar-05-06 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 41. i could throw up |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sellitman
|
Sun Mar-05-06 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 42. You have to admire these guys.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mr_Spock
|
Sun Mar-05-06 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 44. Holy F-ing crap!! The United States of Halliburton!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| progressoid
|
Sun Mar-05-06 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 45. I'm shocked!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BrklynLiberal
|
Sun Mar-05-06 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 47. SAH-PRAHZ- SAH-PRAHZ! SAH-PRAHZ! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Coastie for Truth
|
Sun Mar-05-06 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 48. Only until January 21, 2009 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Blue_Tires
|
Sun Mar-05-06 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. ttt n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greenbriar
|
Sun Mar-05-06 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. I called that when I found Halliburton and Dubai were partners |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 22nd 2013, 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC