Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CLARK: America's beacon is fading, at home and abroad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 02:50 PM
Original message
CLARK: America's beacon is fading, at home and abroad
Today, Wes Clark delivered "The Real State of the Union," a keynote address before the New America Foundation. It was relegated to C-SPAN3, even tho there was no House agenda for them to cover--they aired a Republican conference instead.

I'll just post a few excerpts. The full text can be found at http://securingamerica.com/node/560

...today, I come before you with concern. Not in a spirit of partisanship, but because our nation is in trouble, veering from its heritage, and sliding into a dangerous future. It doesn't have to happen this way, but we can change course only if we speak honestly and directly about what's gone wrong, and why, and how we must change, and then reach across Party lines to bring the American people together.

Today, billions of people abroad believe that America's beacon is fading, our star is dimming, and that America’s time is passing. Why?

Because four years after 9/11, Osama Bin Laden remains on the loose in the fastness of western Pakistan, and Al Qaeda remains a potent force among millions of Muslims.

Because the threat of terrorism has actually increased, partly as a result of the unnecessary invasion of Iraq, where after almost three years, we find ourselves enmeshed in an intensifying sectarian struggle that is drawing in jihadi terrorists like a magnet and creating a new cadre of hardened opponents to America and our friends.

Because, despite our tough talk, Iran is discarding its international obligations in the apparent pursuit of nuclear weaponry, while simultaneously questioning Israel's existence and raising the specter of wider conflict in the Mideast

Because, North Korea, with a standing army of more than 1 million men, armed with chemical and biological weapons as well as long-range missiles, is defying US efforts to contain its threat of nuclear proliferation.

Because, in the process of this struggle against insurgents and terrorists and the proliferation of nuclear weapons, we are in danger of losing the very principles we are fighting for as revelations of torture and degrading treatment of those detained confound our long standing commitment to human rights and undercut our moral strength and leadership.

Because America's long-standing commitment to assisting democracy abroad was recklessly transformed into hot rhetoric and direct action in Iraq – and it has not only offended cultural and national sensitivities in the Middle East, but it is also contributing to the anger and violence in the region.

Because while we are distracted by the war on terror, Iraq and Afghanistan, rising global competitors like China are taking advantage of the security umbrella we have created to lock in their own access to the resources needed to fuel their stupendous growth.

Because the United States has stood silently while the historic opportunity of a democratic Russia is systematically crushed and other new democracies threatened by the same power ministries and entrenched authorities that enslaved hundreds of millions during Communism's long reign.

Because our oldest friends and Allies, in Europe and Asia, are questioning America’s commitment to the dialogue, institutions, and principles that kept us safe throughout the Cold War and even helped end ethnic cleansing in Europe during the 1990's.

The plain truth is, in America's rhetoric and conduct since 9/11, we've made more enemies than friends in the world - and that's no way to protect the American people!

And all of this at a time when Americans are more dependent on events abroad than ever before: the war in Iraq; the daily notification of losses; the threat of another terrorist incident; the rising price of gasoline, a global economy.

And here at home, to speak candidly, that beacon of hope is flickering also,

Because we’re losing our manufacturing base in America, and failing to face the realities of a global labor market, international trade and capital flows which are robbing millions of Americans of income security and have mired us ever deeper in debt.

Because, while, statistically, the unemployment rate may be a little below 5% now, according to the way the Administration measures, these figures mask millions of people in the ranks of the long term unemployed, or trapped in low wage jobs, or underemployed in jobs which fail to use their skills.

Because even highly skilled jobs in the so-called knowledge industry are moving abroad, with big firms like Microsoft and GE as well as thousands of highly competent foreign-born, US educated entrepreneurs and business leaders seeking new talent, lower-cost labor and less competitive, friendlier business environments.

Because at home more than 45 million Americans lack access to health insurance, a profound systemic failure and imposes a staggering human cost on those least able to bear it.

Because both our infrastructure and our system of public education have continued to decay, caught in a squeeze between rising costs for salaries, supplies, construction and repair, and rising federal deficits.

Because despite over thirty years of warning, this nation still has no policy to lead us to energy independence from the volatile and conflict-ridden regions where, today, the “geostrategic risk premium” is adding billions of dollars to the costs imposed on the American people.

Because the legal protections for the environment and natural resources on which so much of our economic welfare have been steadily undercut by new laws and policies, even as the Administration has tightened restrictions on the scientists and analysts who could tell us of the dangers ahead.

All this is common knowledge.

But what perhaps most surprising this year – despite the skill and dedication of our civil service, diplomatic, and military personnel - was the tragic incompetence of our government: failing effectively to assist the states in the terrible humanitarian catastrophe of Katrina, stumbling through a repetitive cycle of inflated rhetoric and crushing disappointments in Iraq and the Middle East, and frustrating millions of American seniors floundering through a poorly designed and badly under resourced Medicare prescription drug program.

Even worse has been the emergence of what appears to be a culture of corruption reaching from lobbyists, through the Republican leadership in Congress, and into the White House itself.


What’s gone wrong? In the last five years we have seen leadership without vision or foresight, a backwards look to tough talk and tax cuts, and a misguided idea from the 1990’s that uncooperative Middle East regimes could be “cleaned up“ by American military action. And at the same time we’ve seen such partisanship that many believe that this Administration lacks the basic decency to respect its political opponents, and the fundamental integrity to adhere to the usual standards of transparency, honesty, and ethics in government.

Enough is enough!


Here’s what we must do.

First, we’ve got to set things right at home. Protecting our Constitution comes first. Country before Party. Congress must fulfill its duties to the American people, not rollover for favors from the Executive branch. We need a full, in-depth, bipartisan investigation of the Administration’s bypassing of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Congress needs to show resolve that the laws it passes do bind the executive branch, whether in wiretapping, humane treatment of prisoners, or the freedom of information act. Moreover, it is time for a special prosecutor, independent of the Department of Justice, to be empowered to investigate the Abramoff scandal, and pursue the leads all the way through Congress and up to the highest office in the land, if necessary.

Then, we have to focus on the principal challenge ahead: preparing our nation to succeed in a 21st Century world where capital and technology flows instantly across borders, where the labor market is global, and where the benefits and security Americans have taken for granted are put at risk as supergiant countries like China, with 1.3 billion people, grab resources, spur economic growth, redress old grievances, and seek to pursue their own interests.

Today, we are indisputably the world’s most powerful nation, but how we organize and prepare America at home, and provide leadership abroad, in the face of China’s growing power, is the real and enduring challenge that 21st Century America must answer. Can we protect that which we value, welcome and profit from China’s growth, maintain our own security, and avoid the conflict and war which has so often accompanied historical changes such as we will witness? I believe we can, if we see clearly what must be done and bend our will to do it.

It begins at home, for this is where the most intractable problems lie, with public education, health care, and creating a business environment that encourages innovation, growth, and the creation of meaningful valued jobs.


Fellow Americans, although our nation is incredibly wealthy and uniquely powerful, we are at historic turning point. Facing multiple near term crises and a great and long term challenge to our very identity as Americans, we have critical choices to make.

Will we choose to emphasize boastful rhetoric or constructive engagement abroad? Will we lash out in anger with military force, or will we pursue every reasonable avenue to avoid the terrible destruction of war? Will we “fight fire with fire,” relying on the means and techniques of our adversaries, or live and lead by the higher standard of the values we have professed? At home, will we persist in shortsighted partisanship, or will we follow a stronger vision to the deep reforms needed to secure our future? Will it be selfishness or shared sacrifice that is our rallying cry?

These are the choices before us.


This is the REAL state of the union, folks. More people need to hear this. Please write [email protected] or call (202) 737-3220 and ask them to re-air the program on C-SPAN tonight or over the weekend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a good speech
Going to the link for the full thing. THanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbonkowski Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. He needs to run again
Although I'm not sure Clark would do any better this time around getting the Dem nomination. I don't know if he is enough of an "insider" to win the nomination. I would love to see him picked up as a VP, or to run for the Senate or the House.

jim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Sounds to me like he already is.
:)

Seriously, he was so impassioned and so articulate, I was half-way expecting him to announce there and then.

I don't know about the insider thing. Lord knows it helps, to all our detriment. But a lot of people in high places know and believe in Clark. And a lot of them know that Clinton is not a winning choice. It may come down to whether anyone who is more of an insider can mount an effective campaign against her. If not, they might start throwing money Clark's way. That's gonna be his biggest handicap, I think. He just doesn't have the resouces so many of the Senators do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe_in_Sydney Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. does sound like he's running
especially given the theme was supposed to be foreign policy and he incorporated plenty of domestic themes in there as well.

I'm glad he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whoop ,,,There it is..
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. shakalaka, shakalaka, shaka
Boom! :nuke:

If this was our real President, we'd have no fear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wes is becoming a true statesman. His speeches are poetry.
I love the guy. Run Wes Run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justabob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. That was a good speech... I hope more people see it/read it
It is everything we are NOT going to hear from Bush, but what people so badly need to hear if only to remind themselves that they are not crazy... that what they are experiencing in their lives is in fact what is happening rather than the backwards world of corporate TV and our current political leaders. It is reassuring to hear from folks like Gore and Clark (and the handful of others) that see the same reality most of us see. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Outstanding speech!
I can't wait for the re-run so I can see it now that I've read it.

Thanks for posting that, jai!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm so pissed off I couldn't watch it
But even reading it is thrilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Single Payer Insurance, Protect Our Constitution, Special Prosecutor
on Abramoff to follow the trail wherever it goes.

Wake up America, to: China securing access to future strategic resources, a thirty year record of failure to develop energy independence, the flow of capital across our Borders, drift toward further wars...

This was a TRUE State of the Union Address
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Investigate why Bush won't use the FISA court
It's time for Congress, for all of us, to put country above party and do what's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Love Clark! Another Ike in the making.
"Because, in the process of this struggle against insurgents and terrorists and the proliferation of nuclear weapons, we are in danger of losing the very principles we are fighting for as revelations of torture and degrading treatment of those detained confound our long standing commitment to human rights and undercut our moral strength and leadership."

Sorry but this really gets to me - our long standing record on human rights? That is TOTAL bullshit. Sorry, I love Clark but it is high time we face up to the REAL threat and admit the truth about our past. Admitting to a long standing abuse of indigents while building our Union would help put to rest our barbaric ancestry as anglo-saxon and spanish conquerors. TODAY, NOW the real threat is a fascist takeover by a soon to be unitary branch known as the Bush administration. IMO, it is THE real threat and Clark will have to make some bold moves to stop it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. More like another George... Washington
You're mixing apples and oranges here. Clark is talking about Abu Grahib and the other prison camps, in Iraq, Gitmo and who knows where else.

Actually, the US has a pretty good record on human rights in war. That's what this statement is addressing. George Washington forbid the mistreatment of prisoners during the Revolution. The US was an early signatory to the Geneva Convention, back in the 1800s, and all the updates since. We supported international Red Cross work in prison camps during WWII, and we created the organizational structure within the UN to identify and prosecute war crimes afterwards.

For the most part, the US has lived up to the ideal, even if not perfectly. This war is the first time we've ever had a government that promulgated a policy of POW abuse and torture as an interrogation "technique." It's a disgrace, and one that hits those of us who served in the military especially hard, because we worked so hard to ingrain the Law of Land Warfare into the military culture. That culture has been turned inside out by the Bushies, and it'll take an entire generation of soldiers to correct.

But I think you're wrong to suggest that Clark doesn't understand perfectly well that the biggest threat is what this administration is doing to our Constitution. That's why he says it must be set back on course first. He's practically begging Congressional Repubs to rise above partisanship to protect our freedom, privacy, and democratic system. I don't think he's naive enough to think they will, so he's working very hard indeed to elect Democrats in 2006. It's his first priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's Clark or Gore, or Gore/Clark, or Clark/Gore in 2008.
In the case of both men, they use the language of America and have the best of compasses in how this nation needs to be led, away from Traitor Bush's reckless policies and into a new (real) "morning in America".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick for something uplifting!
Thank you, Wes!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemocratInSC Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. General Clark's speech is great and I support him in general, but ...
... during the 2004 campaign I heard him say, too many times, that outsourcing "our highly skilled jobs in the so-called knowledge industry" wasn't such a bad thing. He advocated creating new jobs at home by developing new technologies to replace those jobs that go abroad. He proposed no investment method for creating the new technologies, whatever they might be. His point also ignored the obvious that the jobs created by all those new techonologies would go overseas just as easily as those created by current technologies.

Clark may have been trying out lines to see how well they play along the campaign trail. As one who, at the time, was supervising outsourced software projects, his words hit me pretty hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. My hit was different, and I was paying close attention also
I never heard Clark say the outsourcing of skilled jobs "wasn't such a bad thing". I remember the key sound bite well, about letting India "have those jobs", but I saw it live and I know the context. It was an impromptu rallying cry phrase that led into an answer Clark gave to a debate question he was asked, it was in no way a policy statement, and it involved software jobs specifically. Clark went on to say that Americans can create good jobs if our government gets behind it and helps. Regarding software for example Clark promised to mandate that all government and military software contracts go to American firms employing Americans because it is critical that we write our own programs. He also talked about changing the tax code to penalize firms that exported American jobs and reward those that created new ones here. Beyond that Clark believes, while there are things we CAN do to fight outsourcing, (and he listed more) he knows he developing world will continue to develop and we have to be prepared for that also.

Once upon a time Japan didn't make cars, and after they started, South Korea still didn't and so forth, but now they do. With the internet anyone sitting almost anywhere in the world can develop software. They don't need a good highway system, they don't need good ports, they don't need elaborate laboratories or factories, they just need a personal computer. Clark thinks we have to rev up government support for technological innovation, and we need to support our education system, to keep America on the cutting edge where it has been for over a century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I also remember his talking about investment in technology
Many times. In the context of job creation, as well as health care, energy independence and so forth. I specifically remember one speech in NH where he went on at some length about how we much invest now if we're going to be economically viable in 20-30 years and beyond.

I heard Clark in Stillwater OK in Oct 05, and he talked about the need to invest in university research capabilities. It wasn't specifically tied to job creation in that speech, but I think the implied message is that new technology and better education leads to a healthier economy at home. How could it not?

For that matter, if you check the text of this speech, he touches on investment in technology as well. I don't think this is part of what I excerpted above, so I'll post it here:

-In the business community, we must spur research, development, and innovation, and the growth of the small companies that provide the majority of US employment. This will mean more private-public partnerships in developing new technology, and in linking our universities to business enterprises, as well as an expanded arsenal of economic and tax incentive programs aimed primarily at small businesses. We must assure investments in the technology infrastructure – the broadband and wireless access improved and modernized highway, air, and rail transportation systems, and the access to affordable, reliable sustainable energy essential to continuing economic development. We must have a real plan to achieve “energy independence.” And we need to do so without further damaging our fragile environment. In fact, sustainable energy and so-called green engineering provide major growth opportunities for American ingenuity, and we must move in that direction.


Please note that what I posted, here and above, is from the prepared version of his speech. You'll have to listen to how it was delivered, as he did extemporate on a lot of points. The video is archived at c-span.org now, by the way. I am told that audio will be up at securingamerica.com soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. Wes should announce he's running now
We need a face and voice that the public can identify as the leader of the Democratic party. Wes needs to just grab that roll and run with it. Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I'm waiting too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. Kick for hope on the morning after....
This was the REAL SOTU.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. ttt n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC