Deleted message

[Name removed]

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[BOSSHOG]

1. "They wanted somebody who could beat george bush."

I guess that is why democrats nominated Al Gore in 2000. Brooks is a sad, pathetic human being who would be right at home at Newsmax, or maybe as a stenographer at the Heritage Foundation. Does his employment satisfy any EEO requirements placed upon the NYT? Dumbasses should not be discriminated against!

[THUNDER HANDS]

2. not only is he a poor writer

He's not funny. And he tries really really hard to be funny in his columns.

Remember the "they call them neocons, neo meaning new and con meaning jewish."

[Catch22Dem]

3. no no no, it's morAn

You must be confused. :)

[Name removed]

4. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Carl Spackler]

5. "It's the tautology, stupid"

That is a great line, you have to admit, and pretty true.

[NashVegas]

6. I'd Call it an Accurate Summary of Events So Far

Just because Kerry fans may not like it doesn't mean it's not so.

[Cocoa]

7. David Brooks should not be underestimated

this column is deeply deceptive. Not as pedestrian as it seems.

Brooks keeps repeating the word "electable," not just to be funny, but to propagandistically convey the message that this is Kerry's ONLY strength, and that it is hollow, not based on anything real.

In fact, John Kerry is an extremely dangerous candidate against Bush due to real things which the whores know full well and are desperately avoiding talking about. They are NOT happy about the prospect of him winning the nomination.

Keep in mind, Kerry was identified early on by Nixon as a serious threat.

Also notice that the anti-Kerry campaign we are seeing now started long, long ago. The Skull and Bones stuff has been going around the Internet for years.