Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Adminsitration Stealing Another Kerry Idea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:56 AM
Original message
Bush Adminsitration Stealing Another Kerry Idea
During the 2004 election one of John Kerry's major ideas in dealing with the problems of the military was to increase the number of special forces soldiers in the military. This morning the Washington Post is reporting that the number of special forces military units are planned to increase over the next decade. It seems to me that Bush, since he was elected has been stealing many of John Kerry's ideas. And during the 2004 election Tucker Carlson said the Democrats did not have any new ideas. Well I guess he cannot tell that to the Bush Administration. They have been using many of the new ideas of the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please make a list of these ideas and your sources so
they can be used against the bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Well there is this
Presidential debate 9/30/04 http://www.debates.org/pages/trans2004a.html

Kerry: Ask the people in the armed forces today. We've got Guards and Reserves who are doing double duties. We've got a backdoor draft taking place in America today: people with stop-loss programs where they're told you can't get out of the military; nine out of our 10 active duty divisions committed to Iraq one way or the other, either going, coming or preparing.

So this is the way the president has overextended the United States.

That's why, in my plan, I add two active duty divisions to the United States Army, not for Iraq, but for our general demands across the globe. I also intend to double the number of special forces so that we can do the job we need to do with respect fighting the terrorists around the world. And if we do that, then we have the ability to be able to respond more rapidly.


and this:


12/8/05 Council on Foreign Relations speech

Now, of course, there will be times, like in Afghanistan, when direct military engagement will be necessary. And that requires reshaping our military for those missions ahead: a larger infantry and more special forces; more personnel trained and equipped to perform post-conflict reconstruction missions; a Guard and a Reserve force that meets the nation’s needs overseas and at home. But let me tell you, because this is a long-range war, we have to do now a better job, even, of destroying terrorist cells and preventing terrorist attacks here at home.

And this:

And at the Georgetown speech on 10/26/05

Finally, and without delay, we must fundamentally alter the deployment of American troops. While Special Operations must continue to pursue specific intelligence leads, the vast majority of our own troops should be in rear guard, garrisoned status for security backup. We do not need to send young Americans on search and destroy missions that invite alienation and deepen the risks they face. Iraqis should police Iraqis. Iraqis should search Iraqi homes. Iraqis should stand up for Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. The difference is Kerry wanted more special forces to deal with spot
problems that occur, because he doesn't believe in sustained airstrikes that cause so many civilian deaths. He never has and never will.

He thinks if the cause is strong enough then we should expect to send in the best trained forces to handle it in a decisive way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Time we stole some of their ideas.

"Bush Adminsitration Stealing Another Kerry Idea"

should be:

"Kerry Philosophy discovered by Bush Administration"

Sounds a bit less defensive and casts Bush as dim rather than malicious. (He *is* malicious but nobody's going to stop voting for him for that reason...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I like that a lot. it give credit where credit is due and does it's
job on Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We need more faith in ourselves. nt.

They aren't the only ones who can manipulate language to their advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry is probably just glad things are happening, but
it really pisses me off that Kerry doesn't get the credit he deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC