Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Societal Costs of Surveillance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Caro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 07:26 AM
Original message
The Societal Costs of Surveillance
If you’re thinking, “Hey, I don’t care if they spy on me. I have nothing to hide,” then consider this article below that I posted in July of 2002, when the Bush administration was trying to implement the TIPS program, encouraging us to spy on each other. Neighbors will turn in neighbors for any reason, including personal spite. There would be a lot of instances like the man falsely accused of witchcraft in The Crucible. From the New York Times:

The Societal Costs of Surveillance

By MICHELE KAYAL July 26, 2002

HONOLULU — Helena Blazkova had come to kick me out.

It was 1992, and I had been renting her apartment in Prague for about a year. I had gone to the former Eastern Bloc shortly after graduate school on a United States government fellowship, and I felt it my duty to show by example how the free world worked. I thought I had been a model tenant. I kept the place neat, I paid my rent faithfully, I even made sure to put out fresh flowers when I knew she was coming over.

But that was the problem: I didn't always know she was coming over. She used to come in when I wasn't home, on tips from the neighbors.

When Helena — my age and, I thought, my friend — came that night to tell me to leave, she laid down a litany of charges: You shower too often. You talk on the phone late at night. You leave your pajamas out and the bed unmade. You've had men here. You have a cat.

Oddly, that was the charge that stunned me most. I had minded a friend's cat for a weekend once. How could she possibly know all this, I wondered. The neighbors had told her, I learned. They had called her to say I had a cat.

It had never occurred to me the elderly lady next door was spying. Nor did I think anything of the woman who seemed always to be on the landing when I came and went, which must seem incredibly naïve. After all, everyone knew the Communists snitched on one another, right? But I never thought they'd spy on me. There was nothing interesting about my life. I had nothing to hide and I wasn't doing anything wrong. But I was different: single, a woman, a foreigner. And that was enough to get me watched.

So the recent brainstorm by the Justice Department to enlist couriers, meter readers, cable installers and telephone repairmen to snoop on people's private lives for anything "suspicious" dredged a cold and until now forgotten feeling from the pit of my stomach. Many have objected that such a program would violate civil liberties and basic American principles. But stoking people's fear to set neighbor upon neighbor, service worker upon client, those who belong against those who don't, does something more: it erodes the soul of the watcher and the watched, replacing healthy national pride with mute suspicion, breeding insular individuals more concerned with self-preservation than with society at large. Ultimately it creates a climate that is inherently antithetical to security…


Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. No I'm thinking that I would like to read the remainder of the piece
and damning you for posting a teaser that one must pay read the entirety of. Poor form, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You're very welcome...
... for thanking me for giving you even part of the information. If you had been enterprising, instead of always relying on others to spoon feed you, you'd have found this link on the Internet:
http://www.mail-archive.com/eristocracy@merrymeet.com/msg00098.html

Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Citizens of East Germany would routinely go into deserted cornfields to
converse because STASI always had their telephone lines tapped pre-1989.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC