Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alito said to have worried over '91 abortion opinion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:41 PM
Original message
Alito said to have worried over '91 abortion opinion
Alito said to have worried over '91 abortion opinion

NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE

November 3, 2005

WASHINGTON – Judge Samuel Alito, President Bush's choice for the Supreme Court, told a pivotal Democrat that he had wrestled intensely with a 1991 opinion favoring an abortion restriction that has become a flash point in the debate over his confirmation.

Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., who sits on the Judiciary Committee, said that in a private meeting he had asked Alito about his dissent in the appeals court case Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The majority opinion in the case struck down a law requiring a married woman to notify her husband before having an abortion. Alito, in dissent, would have upheld that provision.

(snip)

Durbin's account of the conversation, which was not disputed by a spokesman for the White House, casts new light on Alito's thinking on an opinion that partisans on both sides of the abortion debate have seized as evidence that Alito would vote to narrow abortion rights.

Interest groups on both sides are mobilizing for a battle because Alito would succeed Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the swing vote on decisions about abortion and other social issues. Durbin, however, said Alito had told him that, rather than addressing the broader subject of abortion, he had struggled to interpret O'Connor's opinions about prohibiting an "undue burden" on a woman's right to have the procedure.

(snip)


Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20051103/news_1n3alito.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is bullshit, he's never wrestled intensely over anything
The Dems are already losing this thing....this drip drip drip of all the "doubt" that Alito has on this stuff...

It's all a lie. Why would Democrats believe ANYONE appointed by BUSH???

Why is there silence from the rightwingers? Why are the pro-Alito ads running.... Dobson and the crew are thrilled.

Democrats are falling into the trap of being "statesmanlike" as the other side gets ready to screw us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nevertheless, he made his decision
Nixon may have wrestled with the decision to break into the DNC headquarters or Bush I to trade arms for hostages, but the deeds were done and in the final analysis, that's all that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Mengele said to have worried about concentration camps."
Who gives a fuck - it's what Alito DID that counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. the mere idea that a politically appointed judge is going to "interprete"
"O'Connor's opinions about prohibiting an "undue burden" on a woman's right to have the procedure" is both preposterous and repulsive from a democratic standpoint.

Judge are to apply laws, not to "interprete" them. If there was a law (voted by congress) about abortion the US, this middle-age debate wouldn't happen...

it's getting ridiculous, same with anti-discrimination.

the true questions of the system of separation of powers, the role of law and the power of the judiciary are not adressed here.

You'll always find a judge that say's that torture is "constitutional" if you appoint him for LIFE...

the US need a new constitution, that's for sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Alito is not neato
I hope he doesn't get confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. So wrestled around a bit before deciding that a woman has no right
to do something without first consulting her husband? Wow, what a man!

Had the question been whether a man needs permission from his wife to <<insert anything you can possibly think of here>> how long do you think Alito would have "wrestled" before saying "Of course a man can do whatever the hell he pleases."

We have enough misogynistic bastards on the Court already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC