Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Voters Choose IRV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:29 AM
Original message
Voters Choose IRV


October 2005


Voters Choose IRV



According to a new study commissioned by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and conducted by San Francisco State University, voters who have had the opportunity to use Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), (also called Instant Runoff Voting, or IRV), prefer it to the old system. 61% of polling place voters and 77% of absentee voters preferred the system where the voter can rank candidates according to choice and have their second or third choice counted if their first or second choice is eliminated. (If your first choice is for someone who does not receive a predetermined minimum percentage of votes, then all those votes are eliminated and your second choice is then counted and so on.) 46% of voters polled (versus the 3% with the traditional system) felt with Ranked Choice Voting they will be more likely to vote for their preferred candidate rather than choose between the "lesser of two evils". Almost all of the voters polled (87%) felt that they understood how Ranked Choice Voting works, indicating that it would be easy to adapt in other communities. Ross Mirkarimi, a Green Party member, currently holds office on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, the body which commissioned the study.
The complete report is availabel here:
http://pri.sfsu.ed

u/reports/SFSU-PRI_RCV_final_report_June_30.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Most people over age 9 understand first, second, third, etc
There is no reason to NOT use it./.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baltlib Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. i would have no problem with it ... but
there is always a but... i would think they should have a limit of seconds choices. i think if you could vote for 3 or 4 extra people it would just make the voting too confusing. i would say to have maybe 2 choices total. i also think that it might make the popular vote tabulating kind of hard too, i mean if some one votes to lets say mr smith as their first vote, and mr smith does not win should their vote be counted in a popular type vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. This link will work better.
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 03:40 AM by Wilms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. oh, for a second there, i thought you meant Irv "scooter" libbey.
heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC