Is Susan Estridge a tool?

[Lone_Wolf_Moderate]

Poll question: Is Susan Estridge a tool?

I was watching her on O'Reilly last night, making her case for Hillary in 2008. Even if you support Hillary (I don't, BTW), her case was hardly convincing. She's always rubbed me the wrong way in recent days. So, is she a tool?

[Justice]

1. a pitifully obvious tool

[GreenArrow]

2. blunt,

rather than edged.

[Debi]

3. With the voice of a St. Barnard (apologies to all St. Barnards) n/t

[afdip]

4. every time i think susan estrich i get the image of

dukakis sitting in that tank with that stupid hat on . . . it's my most lasting impression of the campaign. embarrassing.

[Viking12]

5. I prefer self-promoting media whore, but tool works too.

[IChing]

6. As Clinton once said "it depends on how you define ....tool..."

or was it "is"?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[MN ChimpH8R]

7. Now a tool

Back in the mid-1980s when she was my Criminal Law professor, she was pretty cool, though. She was the first woman editor in chief of the Harvard Law Review, clerked for Stevens and worked for Ted Kennedy when he was chair of the judiciary committee. Sad to see what she's become.

[Name removed]

8. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[AX10]

9. Susan Estridge = Alan Colmes.

[AlinPA]

10. A tool of Faux, yes. She is hard to take (her voice) so Faux uses

her with Colmes, both poor presenters and wimps.

[Ignacio Upton]

11. She's a spineless DINO, a female version of Colmes

She also campaigned for Arnold in the 2003 Recall.