Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush would lose election if held this year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Broken Acorn Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:04 PM
Original message
Bush would lose election if held this year
Edited on Tue Oct-25-05 03:05 PM by Broken Acorn
A day late and a dollar short.

---

In the latest poll, 55 percent of the respondents said that they would vote for the Democratic candidate if Bush were again running for the presidency this year.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html

---

I still have a problem with * winning legitimately last November. How could a candidate who received a MANDATE from the Electorate use up all his POLITICAL CAPITAL so quickly, less than a year?

Was he really a legitimate winner or was there election fraud in Ohio, Florida, New Mexico, Nevada, California (vote padding)?

I think those Central Tabulators have a mind of their own when it comes to tabulating Democratic votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. wow, now Kerry can sleep peacefully knowing that the nation...
is full of idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. All these scandals that are in the news
now about Plamegate, DeLay etc. were known before the election. The 'culture of corruption' was there then but the media did not report it and the dems didn't emphasize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's already lost two previous elections...
just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken Acorn Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Agreed Kierkegaard
He never won in 2000. Gore beat him in every type of recount possible in Florida. I believe there were 26 potential types of recounts possible.

* was appointed King by the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Unfortunately for us...
it appears that the weasel actually believes this part: "...appointed King by the Supreme Court"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. He was supposed to - in 2000, and 2004...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not if we are still using Diebold voting machines...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Right--like Stalin said--it's not about who votes but who counts the
votes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush lost the last two elections also n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. It doesn't really matter a damn if Bush would get 1% today.
The election was in November.

Still, the image of so many Bush voters kicking themselves is a nice one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewInNewJ. Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. For those in that poll who voted for Bush,
Let them eat cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. They probably are eating cake.
Lots of cake.

Off of silver plates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. You mean those "mother" computers have been tampered with, doncha?
Just like Teresa Kerry conjectured. I'm with Teresa.

If anyone thinks this corrupt bunch would not make damn sure they won in 2004, they are totally naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. He lost that one held in 2000, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC