I'm a little disappointed w/the ad for Sherrod Brown for senate on this...

[angryinoville]

website. He's a good congressman, but if they want to win a senate seat, they should run Hackett. I think he has a better chance.

[Cha]

1. You should give the link

if possible.

[angryinoville]

4. When I click on discussion forums, there's an ad for him on the top...

of the screen

[Cha]

5. Oh, that ad! Sorry, I

thought there was a website.. Sherrod Brown for Senate.

[rockymountaindem]

2. Please see the thread started on this yesterday.

The people from Ohio who posted in that thread feel otherwise.

[SteppingRazor]

3. Given DeWine's numbers...

A ham sandwich, properly marketed, could beat him at this point.

I'm for running Hackett against DeWine and then Brown against Voinovich in '10, but I'll take either.

Politically, I think it's better to run Hackett at this point. Either candidate can beat DeWine, but Brown will still be a viable candidate in '10, while Hackett's star will likely have dimmed without political experience to back up his current celebrity.

Policy-wise, I'd rather have Brown. He's simply a more-progressive candidate.

[zalinda]

6. He probably paid for the ad n/t