Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, what did we learn from the NYT/Judy Miller articles?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:40 PM
Original message
So, what did we learn from the NYT/Judy Miller articles?
Edited on Sat Oct-15-05 08:50 PM by DemsUnited
Quite a bit, actually, and none of it real good for Libby.

1. Judy Miller doesn't seem to be the mysterious reporter source as speculated. Too bad for Mr. "I heard it first from a Reporter" Rove.

**This tired excuse is looking like a dead end for the defense.

2. Both Judith Miller & her (first) lawyer Abrams sure thought that Libby did NOT want her to testify because of fear that she would contradict Libby's testimony.

**Smells like obstruction in the morning.

3. Even Ms. Miller was surprised about Scooter's "Aspen" letter because it seeemed to be trying to guide her testimony, bascially instructing her to say that Ms. Plame's identity had not been discussed. But, according to Miller, "my notes suggested that we had discussed her job". The letter also seems to be telling Miller to limit her testimony to the two July conversations and don't mention the June one because, as we found out last week, Scooter sure didn't 'fess up to any June conversation.

**A little more obstruction because we just don't have enough yet, plus a hefty double dose of perjury.

4. Libby was already slamming Joe Wilson on June 23rd, two weeks BEFORE Wilson's Op Ed piece was published. This buries the "we were just setting the record straight in response to Wilson's OpEd piece" excuse.

**Ahh, a door into criminal conspiracy.

5. On June 23rd, "Mr. Libby raised the subject of Mr. Wilson's wife for the first time" and that she worked at the CIA in a "particular bureau within the agency that dealt with the spread of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons". So Scooter had some intel on "Wilson's wife" two weeks BEFORE the classified state department memo was circulated on Airforce One.

**The conspiracy door opens wider and a big old question: just where DID the intel on "Wilson's wife" come from?

Personally, I think Fitzgerald already knows the answer to that...





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. We haven't heard all of it
we only hear snippets of what actually went on and it would make your hair stand on end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. you have nailed it - scooter lied, and seemed to want Judy to lie for him
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. We also learned that Judy sounds like she has alzheimers judging
from how faulty her memory is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yup, the I just don't remember defense. Actually, she's playing a game
with Fitzgerald, trying to see how far she can go. Remember, she won a concession from him to limit her testimony to Libby only and that she would not have to name any other sources.

Personally don't think that's gonna play too well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC