zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 07:39 AM
Original message |
| The Repukes' last line of defense against releasing the A.G. pics could be |
|
the nail in the coffin.
A lot of suspicion is that the pictures and videos out of Abu Ghraib involve raping children.
The last line of defense that the Repukes will probably try to use would be that they cannot release the stuff because it involves children and minors, which would constitute CHILD PORNOGRAPHY!
Ergo, the problem that they would have is that the photos document how truly horrible the greenlighted orders-following soldiers really treated the prisoners.
Remember, when shown the unreleased pics and vids, some congresspeople said that they were truly disgusted and the abuse was far worse than what was already exposed . . .
|
leveymg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. They'll digitally edit the photos and video so no genitals are shown. |
|
I have no problem with that.
|
ET Awful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. If they do that, then we have a prosecutor demand the names of the |
|
soldiers appearing in the photos so they can be prosecuted for child molestation, endangerment and lewd acts involving a minor.
|
leveymg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Along with the names of their superiors who set the scene for this. |
|
The indictment reads: Co-conspirator No. 1, President of the United States; Co-conspirator No. 2 . . .
|
ComerPerro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Maybe KS AG Phil Kline will come to their rescue |
|
since he is apparently so "concerned" about the children.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Jun 18th 2013, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message |