Gloria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-05 12:17 PM
Original message |
| Craig Crawford told Ron Reagan that it's such a long time to |
|
2006 that DeLay out of the picture may hurt Dems because they planned to run against him as a symbol of GOP crap.
Well, if the Dems can't packaged DeLay, Frist and the whole lot of them into a nice little presentation with a bow on top, then they are totally helpless!!
And the DeLay contacts seem to be the sort of gifts that can keep on giving.....
|
neuvocat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. That's alright. There's still George W. Bush. |
Vanje
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. like theres a shortage of symbols........ |
Connie_Corleone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. There's plenty of 'em to use as a symbol of GOP crap. |
thefloyd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Delay will still be in office just not majority leader. Also, Delay will fight the indictment causing an ongoing headline grabber. Frist is also in the picture. A pattern can easily be established
|
lancdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. DeLay is just the tip of the iceberg, Craig |
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. It's only a little over 13 months |
|
He is indicted. Unless he plea bargins, how long will it be before this goes to trial. Seems it will be pretty recent, if not still pending in Nov 2006
|
Ignacio Upton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. How long will it take to reach a conviction? |
|
I predict he will be convicted in late 2006 anywhere between June to December.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 23rd 2013, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message |