Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush must not be allowed to resign!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:51 PM
Original message
Bush must not be allowed to resign!
If he resigns we could end up with Dickhead Cheney as The President of the United States of America.

But if he's impeached:
"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment" - US Constitution.

Impeachment sounds a lot better to me.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not an Option......Jail time is in his future!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Unfortunately jail time is not an option ...
Article I - Section 3 - Clause 7:
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Bummer huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Not quite
THe IMPEACHMENT won't produce jail time.

But the criminal trial that uses the impeachment proceedings as evidence most certainly can and will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. dont worry. never would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Two Steps Forward
one step back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I agree. Maybe the Chimp can pardon his administration first.
Just in case. And how many more years does he have to rebuild his image ?
This might be very, very funny - if so many lives and and so much treasure had not been squandered during his coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Three Steps Forward: IMPEACH the BASTARDs!!!! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush will never resign.
When its time for him to go-they will have to drag him out of the WH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedomfried Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. They'll tote him around like the cadaver on "Weekend at Bernie's"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. uh, where does it say that in the U.S. constitution
From what I read, Cheney could still take over with an impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Article II - section 4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. please spell it out for me, I still don't see it
Here is a c&p from whitehouse.gov:

Section. 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.


I interpret this meaning anyone in the above list shall be removed if impeached, conviceted, etc. Not that *all* of the above list would be removed.

Where does it say that Veep would go too, if *only* the President is impeached?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I read an analysis somewhere...
that explained that it meant that if the President was impeached, all the others would removed also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheVirginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. That's not accurate.
Each individual would have to have their own seperate impeachment trial. Which means that, if George Bush is impeached, Dick Cheney becomes President, and would require a seperate impeachment trial to remove him from office. If Cheney appoints a VP in the interim, then that person would rise to the office of the Presidency (a la Ford) if Cheney were to resign/die/be impeached; if not, then Hastert would become President.

Even if the President and VP could be impeached together, Hastert is certainly not part of the administration and would not be included in that group. But that's all moot, because it doesn't work that way.

The entire conversation is moot, because if impeachment was looming and certain (like it was for Nixon), Bush would simply resign. There is nothing that could stop him. And the next President, which would surely be a Republican (unless Cheney is impeached as well before he can appoint a VP, and the Democrats win the House in '06) could simply pardon Bush (and Cheney, too) like Ford did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. No one could be worse... no one...besides...
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 07:58 PM by melody
All someone would have to do is set-off a garage door opener near Cheney in the Oval Office and *squink* that's all she wrote.

btw, Big Brothers watching over us: this is a joke. (edited to add)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. I hate to be a bearer of bad news but neither thing is going to occur.
Chimpy is going to be in the White House until 2009 unless he somehow dies and that is also very unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madame defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Somebody should...
invite him to an open bar Frat party...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. But each one
must be impeached individually. If Bush is impeached, Cheney will become President. Don't misread what has been said. You cannot impeach an entire administration. It cannot be used to overturn an election. Get rid of Bush, say hello to President Cheney. Best bet is 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. impeach, convict, then Indict and convict
We can impeach the whole bunch-- one by one-- starting 1-20-07
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Starting with Cheney
He's the nexus of evil, and * would be quite a bit weaker without him.

If Cheney's out, then * would appoint a new veep, who'd have to be confirmed by Congress. If said appointee isn't confirmed, then when * is removed, the Speaker of the House (presumably a Dem) would become president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Impeach?
Maybe. Convict? We're going to get a 2/3 majority in the Senate? It'd be nice, but my money goes the other way. Bush will leave the White HOuse in 2009, and nothing is going to change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yes IMPEACH! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. WE have maybe 4 moderate repub senators-- right now-- 3 more they could
investigate

Take out
CHeney

Impeach Bush

DOes Nancy Pelosi become president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. No, Denny Hastert is next in line after Cheney.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Welcome to DU
If we have the house and senate by 2007 Hastert is non factor-- get the ball rolling NOW


See the solutions-- not the problems-- if you dont plan to get Haastert out of the way --

HOw can the goal be achieved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheVirginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Even the most liberal Republican senator
Would never vote to impeach President Bush, unless he does something else horribly wrong that's against the law. Its taken this long for any Republican to speak up against the war, let alone go as far as saying that Bush is a liar or should be impeached. Hell, I'd be surprised if there are more than a dozen Democratic senators who would vote for impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC