Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

what should the Dems do to attract conservative voters?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:52 PM
Original message
Poll question: what should the Dems do to attract conservative voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. actually if you want to attract the right........
.......all you have to do is promise to lower taxes!!

That gets them every time!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. hey, read my lips!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:56 PM
Original message
screw the conservative voters
we need to appeal to the non-voters those that voted for bush and haven't seen the light after 5 years of getting shit on are lost causes. We need to empower the non-voter. The Dem politicians need to come back left of center and stop trying to do the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
52. Amen Goddess40! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Piss on them. They seem to like it.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. we seem to be on the same wave length
I think Howard Dean might be too, at least I hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. mouse traps with money on them? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. decry the Bush deficits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. how well has that worked to this point? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. is that a rhetorical question?
here's a sincere question for you: do you think the dems should make an issue out of the Bush deficits? (I do)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. no.
Yes, I think they should make an issue of the deficits. That alone won't do much, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. another one
attack Bush's prescription drug boondoggle, which had quite a bit of conservative opposition.

Also, trade is another issue that can attract some conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
43. Loudly and at every turn. I can't believe how few Dems have picked
up on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. act like damn democrats for a change. and let the voters come to them.
its honesty and sense vs lying and nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't think we're allowed to do that any more.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Large Middle Class tax cuts. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. which result in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. ...Conservatives voting Democratic.
That and plenty of money being spent on consumer goods- and more money for folks like mabye you or me to start localy owned, non-corporate businesses that hire local people...More money staying in the community...

This would be at the expense of the top 1%-who would have to have their taxes raised for this to work- but they would also benefit from the middle class consumerism...

Middle class tax cuts would raise the standard of living in this country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
44. I've been thinking this for some time. More disposable income
for the middle is the best way to boost the economy.

The rich spend a far, far smaller percentage of their incomes than the middle class and poor do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. Socialized healthcare would save the middle class more money, but...
You can bet that, that won't be happening any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. We could point out that
Making up lies to pave the way to war, running up the biggest debt in the nation's history, and deciding to stay on vacation for a couple of extra days instead of responding to the worst natural disaster to hit our country in decades are not conservative virtues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Screw the teachers' union!
Just joking.:D :evilgrin:

I go with the 1st choice. I say we sacrifice none of our own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. bad cobalt!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Start treating the causes, rather than the symptoms of socioeconomic
injustice.

I voted for letting them self-destruct.

Rather than fighting divisive battles over AA, welfare, gay rights, etc., use economic judo.

Correct the imbalance of 200 years of white ownership, empower the economy to provide jobs for all, separate benefits from marriage.

Tax the crap out of the ownership of things not created by labor: land property values and licenses. Taxing these doesn't put a single person out of work, while decreasing housing costs and reducing sprawl & transport costs.

Reduce corporate welfare by charging market rates for access to federal property for mining, drilling, grazing, and timber cutting. Reduce corporate welfare by eliminating grandfathered polluters. Reduce corporate welfare by retaining patents found through federal research in the public domain.
Improve employment by reducing the payroll tax such that people keep more of their check, and employment becomes cheaper. As more people are employed, labor becomes scarcer, and wages increase.
Come up with a universal health care plan that isn't attatched to employment, and doesn't write a blank check to big pharma. Single payer scares government insurance scares me more than the military-industrial complex and federal flood insurance do. I like Switzerland's UHC program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dR. O Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. well
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 09:18 PM by dR. O
I would suggest ditching the PC UTOPIAN agenda i.e. REALITY is not even close to UTOPIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Read this
this source came from another thread here at DU:

The Republican Nemesis
http://www.taxwisdom.org/republican_nemesis.htm

but the author nails it.


Here is the thread at DU that introduced this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2095720
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. Stop calling Conservatives, NeoCons; and stop calling Moderates,
Conservatives. Then go after the Moderates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. The moderates already vote for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Not the moderates who are convinced they are conservatives, just
not one of those wingnut NeoCons. Took me 5 years to convince a friend that she was a moderate, not a conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Not necessarily ...

Depends partly on your definition of a moderate, I suppose, but a sizable percentage of people see themselves as moderate who are either socially conservative but fiscally rather liberal or socially liberal and fiscally conservative. Both of these groups typically call themselves moderates. They'll vote either party, depending on who speaks to their own individual interests.

Oklahoma, for example, is full of the former. Those politicians that tailor their message as an appeal to the rights of workers and who avoid offending their social values tend to do better. Democrats within this state focus of the labor rights while Republicans concentrate on the social aspects. Due to the image as portrayed by Republicans of the national Democratic party, Republicans have lately been winning this battle because local Democrats have been ineffectual in countering it. They seem to think the goal is to focus more on fiscal conservatism when in fact what is moving moderate Democrats to vote for Republicans is the social message conveyed by Republicans.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
50. No, they don't. They are confused by the verbage. My friend
thought it was alright to be a conservative as long as she wasn't a NeoCon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
45. There are conservatives and there are neocons. One group (neocons)
really don't have the interests of the true conservatives at heart.

Neocons favor (and the Bush administration is the proof) of much smaller government, but--and this is HUGE--much more governmental power over our everyday lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. The NEOCONS are the conservatives. They are the John Birchers,
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 03:33 PM by tsuki
Roy Cohns, J. Edgar Hoovers and Joe McCarthys. Look at FR. They have avatars for McCarthy. They consider him a real, true conservative. And he is.

Goldwater, Rockefeller, and hell, even Nixon were conservative leaning moderates. The conservatives and fundies were considered the wingnuts of the party.

It has taken me five years to convince my friend that she is a moderate. She knows that to vote conservative now is to vote for those in power. There is no difference between NEOCON (a made up word) and conservative.

We need the moderates back. We need for them to understand that they are moderates, and not conservatives. We don't need to give them an excuse to vote conservative using a hair-splitting, conservative talking point like NeoConservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. do we want
conservative voters really? I think we have to get back to being the party of progressive thought instead of being repuke light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. there's a point to be made there, yes.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #23
46. We need to stand on principle and let voters make the choice.
We don't need to troll for conservaticve voters, we just need to state our case and TRUE conservatives will have to choose us or the neocon agenda.

Guess who has more appeal to the TRUE conservatives? We do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
25. Simplify, simplify, simplify, short sentences
camera friendly faces, staged rally's, and strong emotional language content.

Hey, it worked for them.

"The change in Republican language began with Newt Gingrich in 1994, and while much of his communication still came across as angry and partisan, when Newt was speaking about policy and not talking about those who opposed him, there was none better, and there has been none better.
Frank Luntz"


I can guarantee no one wants to hear about the intricacies of govenrment, budget, and financing, etc.


"Language: A Key Mechanism of Control- Newt G."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4443.htm

They want: (check out the article and see how often they use these words to stir people)

active(ly)
activist
building
candid(ly)
care(ing)
challenge
change
children
choice/choose
citizen
commitment
common sense
compete
confident
conflict
control
courage

learn
legacy
liberty
light
listen
mobilize
moral
movement
opportunity
passionate
peace
pioneer
precious
premise
preserve
principle(d)
pristine
pro- (issue): flag, children, environment, reform
prosperity
protect
proud/pride
provide
reform
rights
share
strength
success
tough
truth
unique
vision
we/us/our
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. that's a fair point.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. Convert them to liberalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robertwf Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. Make them think we have Halliburton jobs for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
32. Other:
Put out bowls of bullshit on the step, the conservative voters must love the stuff, seeing how much of it they swallow from this administration every day....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. Point out to them the link between voting Republican ...
... and having gay or lesbian children.

John Ashcroft ... Phyllis Schlaffly ... Randall Terry ... Alan Keyes ... Mr. and Mrs. Rove

That should scare the hell outta them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Really asscrafty and turd blossom's kids join
Mary C. and Newt G's family tree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Dang! I forgot about Mary and Candace!
There's something to that idea after all.

And yes, it's true about John "Let the Eagle Crap" Ashcroft's oldest kid, John (Jay) Jr. In fact, there were rumors that Ashcroft stepped down as attorney general in part because the gay press was going after the story about his son hot and heavy. (Knowing some folks that knew the Ashcrofts when he was governor, there are some really strange stories that can be told about the family. I can imagine Ashcroft exploding like an eagle hit by a cruise missile if he ever saw his face on the cover of The Advocate under the headline "Daddy Dearest.")

Don't know about turdblossum ... actually, I was referring to his parents and all the rumors that KKKarl at least has a closet door that swings both ways. (Personally, I'm more of the opinion that KKKarl has female AND male blow-up dolls stored under his bed.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Such hypocrites- they would sell out their own flesh and blood
for base votes.

They know better than to dehumanize and scapegoat but noooo.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
37. Educate them
about what works best for the country and for them. Conservative voters who are middle class or lower are incredibly uneducated when it comes to knowing what helps and hurts them. They don't understand tax cuts, Social Security, Medicare, health care in general, foreign diplomacy, you name it.

Its been a big failure on Dems part in recent years. They haven't done a very good job of defining what works for the country and citizens and its caught up with them. In fact, Dems became so obessessed with popularity and polling, they completely forgot about educating voters.

They have a lot of work to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
38. Whaaaat? There is no 2 X 4 option?
First you take a 2 X 4, and knock some sense into them.;-)

I chose the first. It seems that many more people are going to have to feel the effects of conservative votes - especially in the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
39. Realize that some conservatives
actually respect people who stand up strongly for their principles, and do not respond well to wishy washy types who don't seem to believe in anything and constantly have their finger to the wind.

Show them how Democratic party values are ones that they can support, ie, fiscal responsibility, belief in accountability, basic competence.

I don't think that conservatives are monolithic, and I genuinely do think that some of them will be drawn by a Democrat who is seen as strong in his/her convictions and principles, is not cowed, and is able to articulate beliefs in such a way that they can resonate with a wider spectrum of people.

I think there are alot of people who will vote for someone they disagree with if that person seems strong and principled, rather than someone they agree with but who seems weak. I think some of *'s voters in the last election fell into that category.

What the Democrats need to figure out is that abandoning our core principles and appearing not to stand for anything makes us appear weak and unappealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
40. run RFK Jr. for president . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #40
59. Unfortunately, that would attract ONE conservative voter (with a gun)
...an employee of the Bush Criminal Empire just like the bastards who killed his dad and his uncle (and maybe his cousin).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MintOreoCookie Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
41. There was a great article in the New York Times some time ago
where the author gave democrats recommendations on how to get moderates interested in our causes. For example, he said that many people see us as "pro-abortion" because we support a woman's right to choose to have an abortion. He recommended that the democrats in Congress find ways to educate people in order to reduce the number of abortions each year. Right now, I cannot remember what he said we should do to accomplish that.

I think our problem is that we don't do a good job informing people of what we stand for. Take the environment. Republicans are pro-industry. We are pro-environment. The republicans try to come off as pro-environment by saying that their relaxing the standards of the Clean Air Act will help our air quality by allowing industry to reduce their emissions on their own and trading with other companies. Give me a break. But you would be amazed at how many people see the republicans as pro-environment. The democrats should be detailing the number of people who die and get asthma as a result of the current air quality. Those are facts that people can relate to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
42. WE'VE become the party of fiscal responsibility and we need to
hammer that fact home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
47. always with the unity themes, U.
Still at it, I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. I'm sort of amazed that the thread is still up here.
Unity...yeah, well, I've tried the unity thing more times than I can count, Pepper, and have found conservative Dem interest underwhelming. This was actually in response to another thread last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
48. Other: convert them to being moderates or even liberals
However, the fact that we stand by and don't tenough action against the GOP is one of the reasons why we are perceived as weak (as a physclogical extension of our perceived weakness on foreign policy.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
51. Screw the conservatives
and give democrats a REASON to go to the polls next time around(other than ABB)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
53. Bush isn't running again
So I am not sure how much of a factor his being a major fuck up is going to be. Just being "not Bush" isn't going to win this next election. Even the Republican candidate won't be Bush and if they are smart, they will stay away from him. In fact, I think they will run their next campaign something like this "I stand for similar things as Bush, but I am not a moron and I am not part of his clique. I am the Republican Anti-Bush."

My answer is not up there. I think that if Dems want to win the next election, WE need to start educating the public NOW. If Dems are going to win back the White House, we need to explain how the 'tax cuts' are directly responsible for some of the problems we are having right now. We have to explain in ways that people can understand, without sounding patronizing, how the 'if its good for big business, its good for all of us' mentality is just stupid and wrong. Most little guys are NOT into being good to big business, BTW. We have to attack the PARTY'S politics, not Bush's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
54. Point out all the Shrub plans that have failed! Then propose our
dofferent plans to fix what's wrong.

A little earlier today, I posted an idea regarding Corporate taxes. I don't think we can ever win by harping on the reverse Shrub's tax reductions, even if we say it's only the ones relating to the very wealthy. People just don't respond well to the idea of a tax increase. HOWEVER! For years and years, special loopholes have been placed in the tax code to give most VERY LARGE Corps. tax exemptions and exclusions that has resulted in many of them paying no tax at all! In fact, lots get a negative tax because of subsidies.

I suggest we propose a total overhaul of the Corp. tax structure. Lots of things could be eliminated completely, like the offshore shelters, no tax due on $$ made internationally until you bring it back into the US, special exemptions isolated to one Corp or a single business catagory or industry, etc. We also need to take a closer look at subsidies. Some are just stupid!

IT may not cure every problem we have in this Country, but it sure would be a good start, and I think it would be a great start, and would quell all the complaints about the Dems not having any ideas, and the majority of Americans would find it acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
55. Give them a strong message of hope for the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
58. NOTHING! It's a failed philosophy. Katrina proved that.
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 08:19 PM by TankLV
We should be courting communists and socialists, progressives and liverals, and all other left wing persons - that is more closer to where we should be headed anyway.

We should villify and ridicule and marginalize all conservatives.

They have proven that they can't govern, and that their policies only benefit the wealthy and those that don't need any further help.

Screw the conservatives.

We don't need them, and I certainly don't want them!

Besides, why would we want to become more like the REPUKES?!

They already have a party - let the repukes keep them and we get everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolvesslasher Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
60. Quit the bashing and start giving better alternatives
I know something that might help. Stop being such hateful pricks who attack anyone that doesn't share the same beliefs and start giving some
positive ideas instead of just bashing the people you should be converting. Every post on here is full of hate and negativity. Why would
anybody want to vote for a Party that just attacks the other Party while totally ignoring any of the faults of their own Party's politicians. You can also give credit where credit is due. Instead of attacking Bush and the Republicans for EVERYTHING that goes wrong. Every time Bush does something, he gets bashed. Where as a Democratic president would not get bashed for doing the same things. That says allot. I bet if Bush met with Sheehan again he would still get bashed about it. How can anybody trust people who are so blinded by hate? Both parties are untrust worthy. So what are the choices?
Democrat- a)hateful/negative
b)untrustworthy
c)Ignores misdeeds of fellow Democrats
d)thinks that Democratic Presidents are perfect

Republican- a)warmongers
b)untrustworthy
c)ignores misdeeds of fellow Republicans
d)thinks that Republican Presidents are perfect

Geez, tough choice.
Good thing theres a third choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC