Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SO...the NYT thinks Bush will replace Rehnquist with GONZALES.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 06:58 PM
Original message
SO...the NYT thinks Bush will replace Rehnquist with GONZALES.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/politics/politicsspecial1/04cnd-candidates.html

Speculation Grows About Minority or Woman Nominee

By NEIL A. LEWIS
Published: September 4, 2005

WASHINGTON, Sept. 4 - With a second vacancy to fill on the Supreme Court, President Bush is much more likely to turn to a Hispanic candidate like Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales or another minority lawyer or a woman to be his nominee, Republicans and former White House officials said today.

When Mr. Bush was preparing for a possible vacancy last spring, White House officials put together a list of nearly a dozen potential candidates. The list included several sitting federal appeals court judges, all of whom could be described as conservative, although each would have brought a different political and philosophical profile to the confirmation process.

The list also included Mr. Gonzales, Mr. Bush's longtime confidant from his days as governor of Texas and White House counsel during his first term as president. A Gonzales appointment would give Mr. Bush the distinction of naming the first Hispanic justice on the court. When the White House was surprised that the vacancy was created by the resignation of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor rather than that of Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, senior political advisers rushed to include some additional women as candidates.

In the end, Mr. Bush chose Judge John G. Roberts Jr. of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and whose confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee were scheduled to begin Tuesday. The selection of Mr. Roberts, who is white, increases the pressure and incentive for the president to choose a minority candidate or woman, the former White House officials said, as did Democratic and Republican congressional officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somehow I doubt it.
Gonzales is a nutcase, but nutcase enough for a SCOTUS appointment? I just don't know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gonzalez in the vacancy, Scalia nominated as Chief Justice,
That's how I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Of course, if Bush were as stupid as most of us think...
... he is, he could nominate Gonzales for Chief Justice, so we could watch Scalia get a twenty-year case of ass rash.... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. I doubt it
The torture memos will be a big problem for Alberto and Bushco does not need that kind of problem at this time. Plus, some other poor bastard would have to be confirmed as AG, which will not be too pleasant in the aftermath of Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC