Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What part of "A northeasterner can't get elected" do people not understand

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:38 PM
Original message
What part of "A northeasterner can't get elected" do people not understand
Are there any doubts about this? It has vbeen 40 years since a Democrat outside the south was elected president, and it took that man having a person off the set of High Noon as his VP to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks. We are stupid.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. If only the south can elect a president
Then why do the rest of the states need to vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. good question
I think we best cut off elections at the mason dixon line and allow the south to decide. It would save all us dumb northerners the money spent on primaries and we could buy heating fuel for the winter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
109. Yeah I'm Sick Of This Pandering To the South...BIG TIME
I'm starting to think that the Confederates had the right idea. Let the freaking red states have their own country, I'm sick of living with their stupid decisions, and I don't want my kids paying for them. If southern people are really that stupid that they will vote for Bush who DUH is from a rich NE family btw JUST BECAUSE OF BEING CLANISH AND PREJUDICED OF THE REST OF US, then fuck them.

I may be biased as a CA native but I think we can do without the likes of Mississippi easier than the other way round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #109
120. Ain't dat sweet.
Bless your heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #120
137. Maybe Southern Dems...
can huddle in one of the coastal states and then we can cut the rest loose. ;-) Which part of the coast looks good to you?
Seriously, to those of us in the North, we take a huge amount of grief from the bigots in the South, who now prefer the Repukes anyway. You may find that too sweeping a comment, but in the Northeast, we hear constantly that we shouldn't bother putting forward a candidate because the South will not accept them. Why the hell not? (Can you tell I'm feeling a bit irked right now?)
No disrespect intended for the Southern Democrats on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #137
141. Cassandra.....
All joking aside, you think y'all get grief from "bigots in the South"? Try livin' down here for awhile.

Thread after thread of how we don't matter or we don't count or we're all racists or we're all Republicans in Dems clothing, ad nauseum. Even when racial beatings, police shootings, gay killings, etc. are going on all the time up North and in the West. It's tiresome.

The fact of the matter is there is very little difference between the regions of the U.S. anymore. We've all been Californicated into one big frickin' strip mall Americana. Easily half the people I meet here are transplants. Yes, we still have issues (like kids having to start school in August so they don't have to be given Memorial Day as a holiday) and it is often difficult to be a Jew here. But we also have a huge, largely Democratic, African American population, a growing and politically reachable Latino population, working women, tree huggers, etc., etc.

A Northerner with vision, a Yankee with a message, a person who can articulate understanding and intelligence along with an ability to get things done can win in the South. A Southerner without those things cannot win in the South. It's a style issue not a societal one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #141
143. Sorry, LD
I guess we spend too much time listening to RW Southerners. You definitely have my sympathy. BTW, NYC is being "malled" as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #143
149. But you have real bagels.
And delis. You have Kosher delis. And CHOCOLATE FRICKIN' EGG CREAMS! What about THOSE? HUH?!?!? HUH?!?!?!?

Ah. Sorry. I got all verklempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #149
181. Real bagels are barely hanging on by their crusts
They keep getting slightly larger and slightly fluffier. We do still have Kosher delis. As for the egg creams, as long as you have Fox's U-Bet, you too can make egg creams. So I send you this link so that you can order some if you want.
http://www.hometownfavorites.com/
We can still get it in the glass jar but they seem to be switching over to plastic. Just as well, as the syrup really dribbles down the side of the jar.
There, there, have some chicken soup. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #181
186. I'm sobbing here!
Cut that out!

I can get U-Bet but the deal is I have type 1 diabetes and, like pork and shellfish are Kosher at a Chinese restaurant, chocolate egg creams are calorie free in a deli!

We have one decent deli in town (Noshville), not Kosher but they fly stuff in from NY every day. Sadly, they are a tad far from where I live. Although my hips are grateful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #181
187. I plead ignorance...
Edited on Thu Jan-29-04 10:31 AM by Skidmore
what the heck is an egg cream?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #187
188. It's a chocolate ice ceam soda
without the chocolate ice cream.

Ice cold glass, ice cold spoon, ice cold milk, seltzer water, and Fox's Chocolate Ubet syrup. Fill the glass 1/3 with milk (rest spoon in glass), fill slowly with seltzer until white foam is just below the rim. Add syrup and stir well - the foam at top should stay white.

No eggs. No cream. I have no idea how it got its name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #141
154. I wish that were true. But here, religion and guns and racism seem
to be the big items and they are OWNED by the Republicans.

People are out of work, they didn't get much in Federal tax cuts, the funding for the already bad schools was cut, property taxes are up, but they plan to vote Republican. God told them to.

Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #154
167. I'm in TN as well.
But from what I have found on my journeys, religion, guns, and racism are everywhere. Republicans foment this crap and the sheeple gobble up the regurgitated bile.

SOME people are starting to realize that their wallets are fatter with Dems in office. The Bible thumpers wouldn't vote for a Dem if he walked on water and turned their 2% to wine. But there is a lot more to the South than the Bible thumper/Confederate flag waving Bubba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #141
182. LurkingDem, so what's the deal with Memorial Day and the south?
Do they consider that a yankee holiday or somethin'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #182
185. Yes it is a Yankee holiday.
It was originally a celebration holiday of victory over the Rebels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
43. Exactly
That candidates believe they have to tailor themselves to the attract the Southern vote is outrageous. We may as well change the name to United States of Hypocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
73. facts, not ideology
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 03:23 PM by digno dave
missing the point, folks. I didn't say that it is right or the way it should be. It's simple mathematics with the electoral college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #73
78. Not so much actually
without winning a single 'southern' state its possible to win the presidency. However, one needs to win the middle states, which is something that Gore had trouble with in 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #73
84. OK ....
SHOW this 'simple mathematics' ...

If you are so sure, then it should be no problem to display the evidence now ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #84
115. In electoral vote terms, it's really pretty simple
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 05:19 PM by hatrack
Start with the states Gore won in 2000, then add Missouri. That's it, and Missouri is most definitely in play this year.

D - 271
R - 267

Incidentally, there's a handy interactive EV map you can fool around with at:

http://www.johnedwards2004.com/map/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #115
124. wasnt asking you ...
I figured YOU had the answer ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #115
131. Gore also lost Ohio and New Hampshire, which aren't southern states
so add to that and oops you've passed 273
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
76. LOL
clearly we don't get it. ROFL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
107. LOL With Snivi Yllom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dukakis Would Have Won If He Had Defended Himself
John Kerry is no Dukakis. Kerry knows he needs to defend himseld against every Bush charge, just as Clinton did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
51. Sorry, no. Dukakis did not lose by "different strategy" kind of numbers.
The gap was not along the lines of different debate strategy or hair style. That was a massive loss that said "the people want the other guy more than me".

2000 was the kind of race where we can debate what might have brought Tennessee into the fold, or whether a "sigh" in a debate might have cost .25%, or if Gore "defended" our beliefs well enough.

Lets HOPE Kerry "is no Dukakis" in ways beyond mere strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. So we are to always be held captive by the South?
I say we need to stand up to them and tell them that their interests do not take a necessary priority to the rest of the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Telling them that their concerns
do not match those of the rest of the nation is sure-fire way to get them to see and admit their mistakes, all right. go for it, but do not be surprised when they vote Repuke, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Who said they don't match, I'm saying they aren't greater than the rest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
133. They say
they don't match. Check the stats on almost any issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. Here, Here. There are plenty of Dems in the south who's interests are the
same as those of people all over the country. Dems there with wins in the midwest, northeast, southwest and in the northwest,....will be just fine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. digno?
is that Italian for dingo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Northeastern being code for Liberal, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
111. well not just liberal bu elitist establishment wealthy aloof aristocratic
ivy leaguer Thats what i think of when i think of the New England area as i am sure yall think of the south as racist hillbilly and uneducated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #111
138. No, sometimes I think of...
elitist, establishment, wealthy, aloof, aristocratic plantation (or industrial farm) owners and Southern business leaders who push Right-to Work laws and keep workers from unionizing and protecting their own interests. Not every idea that emanates from the North is bad for Southerners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am very susceptible to fact-free arguments
so please, do go on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The facts are there
you just aren't listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. What facts?
I haven't seen them , please post them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Here you go
I'll spoon feed it to you.

FACT: It has been 40 years since a Democrat outside the south was elected president.

This is a fact. Sure, it doesn't mean that a non-southern Democrat can't become President, but right now its the only fact anyone has placed on the table. The ball is in your court to demonstrate why this fact is irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #40
54. A few facts for you:
When Jimmy Carter ran in '76, it had been over 120 years since someone had been elected president from the deep South. But he won.

When the first George Bush ran in '88, it had been over 150 years since an incumbent vice president had been elected president. But he won.

And Bill Clinton was the first sitting governor to be elected president in 60 years.

So don't tell us that a New Englander "can't win" just because it hasn't happened in a while. We've elected several New England presidents in the past, including John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Franklin Pierce, Calvin Coolidge, and John Kennedy. It's about time we had another!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
66. Nice
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #54
89. At last
A person who has sense enough to respond to facts with facts. Thank you.

Now if you can explain what states Kerry wins to cinch the EC I'm a believer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sistersofmercy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #54
122. Whamo! Great rebuttal!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #54
130. Well reasoned, but
Can't you conceed that Kerry would be more electable if he represented Georgia instead of Mass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #54
170. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #170
172. Umm, Dean isn't conservative
Kerry and Kennedy are great Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #40
62. Now find a relevant fact, Nederland
The country has changed a little in the last 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Were any of those northeasteners running against G. Duhbya?
Because I don't remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. The country is sick of the Conservative morons
They are ready for progressives. Health Care, SS, Medicare, the dollar, fair trade, That is the progressive story. Kerry - Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
44. Spoken like a person
...who has only liberal friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Is Tenn considered a southern state?
Is Tenn a southern state?

And if it is, isn't Gore from that state?

And if he is doesn't that mean that we can't elect a southern guy either?

And if thats true doesn't that mean that we can't elect a democrat?

And if thats true doesn't that mean we don't need to vote?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. So U.S. presidents always have to come from "the south"?
?
:crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phelan Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
106. all Dems since JFK have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
123. west, midwest, south, southwest, ne bootstrap demo
Duh, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. this is insulting to Southerners, isn't it?
What you said is certainly the conventional wisdom, and appears to have a lot of truth to it.

But when people say this, they're saying people from other parts of the country will ignore regionalism and pay attention to a candidate's vision and policy stances. People from the South, however, have to be appeased by having someone who resembles them in some way, or so the argument goes.

As a Northeasterner, maybe I'm missing some other element to this argument, but the whole premise seems to be insulting to Southerners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IADEMO2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. I second that .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
159. I used to agree but now I live here.
Conservative Southerners insist on being catered to. They keep saying it's a "values" thing. I'm so tired of hearing "our values", "southern values", "Tennessee values" when what they mean is greed of the rich, racism, bigotry, intolerance, and anti-intellectualism.

There are, of course, some Southern progressives but often even the Democrats are conservative (think Zell Miller).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
134. I think
you have something here. Still, the South does think a little differently about most of the issues than the Northeast does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. George HW Bush and George W Bush
Both Northeasterners who won* the presidency

*won meaning attained the office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennel Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. this is total BS
Why must we hear this over and over? If the situation was reversed, and we were repeatedly stating "what part of 'a southerner can't get elected'do people not understand?", there would be outrage.
Where is the outrage from Northerners?

Lastly:
-our current President is by birth a Northeasterner, along with his father, which you seem to have forgotten in your "40 years" quote.
-I do believe JFK is still one of our most popular Presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
79. oh boy
Dubya is as much a Northeasterner as Pat Robertson is a Hindu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. hahahahahahah!
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahh!

Don't take that as laughing with you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. Uh who is in the White House right now?
I know this is a matter of perception through spin but W was born in New Haven Conn. July 6th, 1946. He went to San Jiacinto Jr. high school for one year and then went to Williams Prep School in Amherst Mass then Yale then Harvard. He made occassional trips back to Midland but he mainly summered in Kennebunktport, HE IS A NORTHEASTERNER!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Bingo. GWB is a Connecticut Yankee re-made as a Texan.
Because that was the image he needed.

The Bush family is from New England. Bush Sr. himself was born in Milton, MA. Their family compound is in Kennebunkport, ME. Bush Jr. grew up in CT.

A northerner can't win? One's in the White House right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. Molly Ivins:How can you tell the Bush family entry in a chili cook-off?
It's the one with Maine Lobster in it.

The actual joke includes in the "texas legislatures chili cook-off" but that wouldn't fit in the subject line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
80. remade a southerner
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 03:32 PM by digno dave
Exactly, "remade". And a job well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
92. He's a Fake.. I have lived in Panama, but I am not a Panamanian
He's a Yankee, masquerading as a Texan.. They should use that in ads..


cue kiddie music:
* in prep school get up
* in his "military uniform" (as a young man)
* in his cheerleader suit
* in the baseball get up
* in his "ranch outfit"
* in the Chinese medallion jacket
* in a business suit
* in the flight suit
and finally in the clown suit with the corporate logos..


Voice over...

He tells us he's a Texan, but we all know how he likes to play "dress-up"..

He is from the Northeast...Connecticut and Maine, to be exact..

Do you want him playing pretend with our country for 4 more years??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #92
94. Perception is everything in politics
He' only a fake if he is perceived as one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. No, he's a thief.
In this case, the idiot premise holds true: the person actually elected by the American people was Al Gore, the southerner.

And you know that very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Notice I didn't say "Elected"
I just asked who was IN the White House
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
55. And don't forget...
His "Texan" father was born in Massachusetts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. prove it
I know about Dukakis, but who are these other northeasterners who lost, Dukakis as another poster points out would have won if he had stood up for himself. Personally, northeast and midwest dems are generally the best IMO. I am a Virginian, have no preferences on where the guy is from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yes, there is doubt.
You see, a lot of southerners are out of work and George proposes to bring in cheap labor from Mexico.

In this election, the vote is AGAINST George.

This isn't the America of the past 40 years. This is America being destroyed by the greediest criminals we've ever seen, and I'm including Teapot Dome.

So, vote to drown in debt, or vote to grab that floating spar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. I don't buy it
and I'm fom the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. 'Not Southern' = 'Not Really American'.
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 02:04 PM by Davis_X_Machina
I bitterly resent Maine never having been a slave-holding state.

My children can't aspire to be president as a result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. That's ridiculous.
Dean or Kerry can easily beat bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. So you want to be like Canada where the PM must always be a Quebecker?
because we love that so much here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
29. What Part of Kennedy and Roosevelt Do You Not Understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
49. What part of Great Depression and Missile Gap do you not understand?
Yeah, I suppose that if unemployment were at 30%, the voters just might turn to a liberal Democrat from the Northeast. But I don't consider that a realistic scenario.

As for Kennedy, he was no liberal. He ran to the right of Nixon on foreign policy. And he certainly wasn't trusted by people like Adlai Stevenson and Eleanor Roosevelt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. There are 2 guys from Texas as "president" and "vp"
right now. (Don't say Cheney is from Wyoming because he hauled ass from Texas up to Wyoming to register to vote when it looked like he was going to get the VP nod on the ticket. For all practical purposes there are two guys from Texas in the WH now.)

Kennedy was a fluke in that 1) Nixon looked terrible on TV during the debates and 2) Kennedy had the Catholic vote 3) Kennedy had that "Camelot" mystique.

None of the NE guys have anything like this to their advantage this time. The rest of the country outside the NE flat won't vote for someone from the NE.

Anyone outside the NE would understand this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. We can win without the South
The Southwest and Midwest are where the election will be decided, not the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. Only theoretically -- I, for one, want a real victory
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elsiesummers Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. While I generally agree with your premise,
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 01:56 PM by elsiesummers
you could say it in a more congenial, less negative way.

On Dukakis (maybe three or four posts down) would suggest that his problem was not simply not fighting back, but that he was short and too ethnic (name and eyebrows) to go over well in the South.

Appearance is Joe Lieberman's biggest problem IMO - not his hawkishness or rightiousness.

John Kennedy was elected.

I think a North Eastern candidate with a leading man appearance and style and a working class background would have a shot.

John Kerry doesn't fit that bill, unfortunately. His military background and his height helps him some, his craggy face and middle name "Forbes" hurts him. We'll see.

Edwards and Clark are better candidates - and Gephardt was a better candidate - though Gephardt might have been Doled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. Gee no responses from the thread's originator, what's that mean?
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 01:59 PM by HereSince1628
I guess we've been entertained. Frankly, I needed that. Waiting for someone like Drudge to slip us early exit polling is really boring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
83. 9-5er
Sorry, i am trying to work here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. What part of
we won't win any of the confederate states anyway don't you understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobinA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
39. I Have Doubts
about this, because I have yet to see an explaination of why this would be the case. Are you saying that Southerners won't vote for anybody who isn't from the south?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. I think it's safe to say that DD has no interest in engaging in a
dialogue.

What can I say? His argument is well not good, but to put it in terms he might understand "All hat and no cattle" or "I never seen a goat so weak east of Junction."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
87. WORKING HERE
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 03:55 PM by digno dave
Once again. I am working over here. I am trying to "engage" when i get a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
86. Gore didn't win one southern state
Uh, none of the southern states voted for the dem candidate FROM the south in the 2000 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
42. The Dingo Ate My Brain!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
88. defensive DUers
Gee, i thought i was expressing a common sentiment among a lot of Dems. Unfortunately my brothers and sisters from the NE are sensitive to the point of insulting a fellow LIFELONG democrat. Just so you know, i wear my political opinions on my sleeve down here in Fort Dubya, TX. It's not an easy thing to do but i do it with pride and conviction.
One look at the electoral map in the last 5 elections proves my point. Granted, there are exceptions, but I would rather rely on a proven theory than an exception when it comes to the future of this country and my livelihood. I sure as hell don't think a limo liberal like Kerry will be the one to buck this trend.
Why so defensive? I wasn't insulting your part of the country. Gauging from your viscious replies it seems like there is sense of anger projection going on. The sooner you folks realize the inherent truth in my statement the better off we all will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #88
93. I'm a Texan too.
And the "inherent truth" in your statement is a figment of your imagination. By the way, Gore did win a southern state - he won Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. reality check
Sorry, i'll refer to things other than historical precedent next time i try to make a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #95
132. Check out message #58 re: "historical precedent" /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #88
102. Trends don't have to be set in stone
There is no reason to think a Northeastern or Northwestern candidate can not win just because there's been a tendency to elect Southern presidents for a while now.

Things change. That can certainly be one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #88
103. viscious replies ????
angry???

lol

not angry or viscious at all! i get angry and viscious when i read something that angers me. not when i read something that is unfounded and rediculous!

silly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #103
108. unfounded? Karl Rove School of Denial
I guess historical precedent doesn't qualify as a substantive example when proving a point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #108
112. you didn't insult 'my part of the country'
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 05:19 PM by matcom
especailly since i am a transplant from an Atlantic State. so glad you chose to capitalize LIBERAL in your post to make sure we ALL knew you were.

"Limo Liberal"????

hhhmmmmmmmm

THAT is the term that is 'suspect' to me frankly. i have heard that NUMEROUS times before (on national talk radio i believe). NUMEROUS times.

see ya at the voting booth :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #112
117. unclear
"capitalize LIBERAL"???



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #117
129. just gald you made it DAMN clear whose 'side' you were on
that's all :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
45. Correction: A liberal northeastern Democrat from the patrician class
I'm not willing to say that NO Democrat from the Northeast could ever get elected president, but it's pretty difficult, especially if they're a limousine liberal.

People forget that JFK was NOT from the liberal wing of the Democratic Party. The liberal wing backed Adlai Stevenson and/or Hubert Humphrey in 1960. JFK was in the center, between the liberal and the Southern wings of the party. JFK cemented his centrist image by selected LBJ, a Texan, as his running mate.

In addition, JFK was running against a pretty liberal Republican. Although Nixon wasn't as liberal as Nelson Rockefeller, he adopted much of Rockefeller's platform as his own. And he selected a liberal Republican as his running mate.

Frankly, it was a close call as to which of the tickets -- Kennedy/Johnson or Nixon/Lodge was the more liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
47. Before Kennedy , no Catholics could be elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #47
60. How many Catholics have been elected SINCE Kennedy?
That's a serious question, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #60
69. None

But then have any run (and survived in a nod to Bobby)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
50. what part of
"There is a first time for everything" do you not understand. That would apply doubly of it weren't for the fact that its happened before. This is as ridiculous as saying that the mets will never win another world serious because its been so long. everyday is a new day.

I'm still voting for Edwards though but not because i live my life by sudostatistics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
52. No offense, but I'm sick of being held hostage by the conservative South
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 02:31 PM by jsw_81
New England has our country's finest universities, a highly-educated populace, vibrant, progressive cities, and spectacular scenery. It's about time we got a president from that part of the country. And if the South doesn't like it, too bad. What are they going to do, secede? They tried that once and it didn't work out too well.

Remember everyone, Gore/Lieberman won in 2000 without a single Southern state; the South isn't nearly as "crucial" as many would have us believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. but by losing WV, Tenn and Florida (officially but not really)
Gore/Lieberman still lost...it should have never been that close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargleamer Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. Without a single southern state?
Remember, Gore did win Florida, the most populated state in the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Yeah, but Florida isn't really considered a southern state
Even though it is the most southern state geographically, only northern Florida is considered southern. And southern Florida is really quite northern. So a northern candidate like Kerry would do well in the south and fare poorly in the north. Are you confused yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #59
77. Texas is the most populous state in the South. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #52
67. Thank You. As a Northeasterner, I am sick and tired of hearing about..
the damn south. "Southern Pride"??? What "Pride"??? The Confederacy, slavery, bigots, jingoistic country "music"??? Intolerance!!! The south is it's own victim. They voted for economic policies that hurt them and they have gotten screwed over the last thirty years and they deserve it. Outsource all of their jobs to India, at least they are hard working, and let the Zell Millers of the world try to survive without work!

If the Northeast is "elitist" then the Southeast is "Racist'!

Why should this one part of the country or any one part control the rest of it???

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoosier Democrat Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
53. George W will sweep the South in November
The South is a conservative region. hence, they will vote for a conservative candidate. We MAY pick off Florida, but that is demographically a Northern state stuck in the South. Plus, we have to deal with even MORE chicanery from the BFEE who will be desperate to hold the state.

Even Al Gore, a Southerner, did not win ANY Southern states. I don't see Edwards winning any this year if he's the nominee.

We need to focus our attention on the "Swing States" that we narrowly lost in 2000: Ohio, Arizona, West Virginia, Missouri, Nevada, and New Hampshire. This is where 2004 will be won or lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. WV and Va. are definitely in play
Virginia actually elected a Dem as Governor in 2001 all the Dem nominee has to do is follow his game plan. Focus not on Richmond & NoVa (Dem) or worry about Hampton Roads/the Beach (Rep) -though Kerry or Clark could do real damage there-but focus on the Va. NC border. Especially the far western part of Va. Going along the border gives you the ability to campaign in TWO states almost at the same time and those areas get almost no attention. It worked for Warner.

WV is in play. Relatives are not happy with W and they supported him in 2000, very middle of the road types too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #53
68. Ruy Tiexera has argued that the Democratic majority will be....
from the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Mid-West, West Coast, Hawaii, the Southwest, and the middle states such as Ohio and Missouri.

The south is a lost cause in every single way.

But still, we can win Florida, Louisiana, Arkansas, and West Virginia.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
58. So with the last forty years of electoral history as your infallible guide
you are here to tell us that no one can possibly get elected president who isn't from Massachusetts, Texas, California, Georgia, Connecticut, or Arkansas? That leaves us with Kerry, Lieberman, and Clark, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
63. Hel-lo, Mr. #76! Who's Campaign HQ's are YOU blogging From?
:wtf: Self-serving drivel.
Abysmal logic. Deplorable conclusion

D not even a George Bush D+
Just a "D"

Your Man in the Faculty Lounge:donut: Gettin' the Sophs into Teddy White!

G.G.:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
64. Can I add "UNINSPIRING" to that?
With regards to Kerry. I give him a very low chance of winning in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #64
72. Uninspiring if you don't know the difference or do your homework
Kerry is a little more dimensional than Clark, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
65. Silly.
Before JFK (a northeasterner) was elected, no Catholic had ever been elected President. According to your logic, no Catholic ever could have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. Does "curu" mean "son of"?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. No it means 'skill'
You would that, think since Curufinwe's father was Finwe, but no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
70. To be honest, I'm a little tired of southern presidents
Johnson, Carter, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II...

There are other parts of the US that need to be represented...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anaxamander Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #70
85. Bush I?
Coulda sworn he was a Connecticuter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
75. Ironic considering Gore would have won had he only won ...

... New Hampshire in the general election. So you could just as easily say it was Gore's inability to carry this northeastern state that cost him the election.

In the meantime, Republican insiders keep referring to Arizona, not any southern state, as the make-or-break state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
81. What part of 'wedge politics' don't you understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
82. The part that dictates Thou Shalt Remain Hostage to the South.
I, for one, am SICK OF IT!

I posted before, here, about this.

Just because you're from the South doesn't give you an automatic entitlement to the Oval Office, anymore than it does if you're a bush.

In fact, I think the South has had MORE THAN ITS SHARE of time in the Oval Office. It's time for somebody else's turn. We've all seen plenty, good and bad, of what people from the South can do. But THEY'VE HAD THEIR TURN. AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN. ENOUGH!!!

And frankly, this CALIFORNIAN is sick of hearing about how the South has so much numerical power and electoral votes and population and blah-blah-blah. I'm from CALIFORNIA. THE BIGGEST STATE IN THE UNION, population-wise, electoral vote-wise, congressional delegation-wise, income-wise, and more. Those, especially those bush-lovers, who say "don't mess with Texas" will get a mouthful from me, starting with "I'm from California, I'm a lot bigger, stronger, richer, more famous, better-looking, healthier, and more forward-thinking than you. I'll mess with Texas any ol' damn time I feel like it." Speaking of course, collectively. I myself am NOT many of those things.

I am tired of hearing about how the South always has to be appeased, coddled, groveled in front of, and "serviced" for anything to fly, politically. The South has given us the bushes, Trent Lott, Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms, Tom DeLay, Newt Gingrich, Don Nickels, the Hutchinson brothers, Ted Olsen, Haley Barbour, the Arkansas Project, Ralph Reed, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggart, KKKarl Rove, Lee may-he-rest-in-distress Atwater, the KKK, Bob Jones University, Lee Greenwood and that obnoxious song, and Toby Keith. That's just for starters.

It's high time we gave another part of the country a piece of the pie. Doesn't even have to be California. We foisted Reagan and Arnold and Darrell Issa on everybody, which is beyond enough for awhile, and I'll be the first to apologize for them.

Granted, Clinton, Gore, Clark, and Edwards are also from the South and yes I could/can/will support either of the last two if it comes to that. But it's because of their ideas and stated plans, NOT because they're from the almighty South. Even though I realize I'll HAVE to think strategically about it, and that some of my support for people is inevitably and forcibly tied to "how they'll do in the South." A necessary evil I wish to heaven we didn't have to put up with.

To you Southerners in DU, my apologies. No chops aimed at you. It's just so doggone frustrating, sometimes!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #82
90. i feel you
I understand what you are saying. My statement was simply based on historical precedent, not personal sentiments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #82
91. Thankyou!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #82
97. oh hell.
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 04:41 PM by ulysses
To you Southerners in DU, my apologies.

I live here and it annoys the crap out of me too. No apologies needed.

on edit - added "too" for clarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #97
100. Even so, one is offered anyway.
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 04:42 PM by calimary
I do NOT mean to diss my Southern brethren and sistren (?) here on DU. But JEEZ! This South-must-lead mentality sucks the big one. You guys, on the other hand, do NOT.

on edit - almost forgot, Molly Ivins, Jim Hightower, Jimmy Carter and the Allman Brothers are also from the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #100
101. I never thought you were dissing southerners period, much less
DUers in the south. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skippysmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #82
128. thanks calimary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
96. Which Gore states do you predict Dem will Lose?

I predict Kerry or Dean would take Arizona from Bush. Which state(s) do you predict Bush will take away to counter this?

This assumes Ohio goes for Bush a second time in a row. If Ohio swings back, Bush needs to take away two or more states.

And I'm ignoring Nevada for now since it will not alone make the difference and yet is almost certain to swing to the Democrat following Bush's 11th hour lie in 2000 vis-a-vis Yucca Mt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
98. there is an 800 lb gorilla in the room
It's possible that with the wrong Dem candidate California may be in play...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curlyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
99. you actually think Bush* is a Southerner?
Dang. You must've had a different geography teacher than I did. Maybe he lived in Texas for a few years, but he's as Ivy-league as they come. Good Lord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #99
104. He lived in Texas only 2 years
As governor he was a resident of Oklahoma somehow, I think. I might be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #104
119. You are indeed wrong.
W's family moved to Texas when W was two years old. He went to public school in Midland until he was 12 when the family moved to Houston. There he went to a local private school until he was sent to Andover at age 14.

He did NOT have a Oklahoma citizenship while he was governor of Texas. I am a Texan, and I can state that with authority.

That does not mean that I like him, but to say that he was only here a couple of years is BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #99
110. perception
Perception trumps reality in politics, i'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
105. Do repukes pander to northerners?
Did the south win the civil war? Aren't we supposed to be one country? People who are bigoted enough to vote on a person based on what state they are from are most likely repukes anyway. Those who vote with their heads and think of their interests will vote with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #105
114. region matters, unfortunately
If you think region doesn't affect voters you are mistaken. It's wrong but it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skippysmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #114
127. Not so much up here
Other "damn yankees" can correct me if I am wrong, but I don't hear anyone in the Northeast saying that they won't vote for Clark or Edwards or Kucinich because they're not New Englanders. And Lieberman hasn't exactly bowled people over up here despite being from Connecticut.

Most of the South won't vote for the Dem no matter where he's from. Which is why, with resources limited, whoever the candidate is will have to pick and choose his or her fights. There are certainly some battleground states in the south, no question. But some states will be written off as a lost cause, no pun intended.

That being said, I'm not sure the candidate needs to kiss the south's ass in order to win. There are 11 states in the former confederacy -- and 39 that aren't. Yeah, I know that the south is growing in population while New England is shrinking. But right now, the south is not the only game in town.

I haven't decided on a candidate yet, but I hope to find someone with broad appeal -- not only to the south, but to the country as a whole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #127
136. I never think of where a candidate is from either-doesn't matter
I wish the South would just stop fighting the Civil War. It would be like us hating the British because they fought the Revolution in my backyard and killed some of my ancestors.

I am sick of being held hostage by the South. I think the Dems should work on some of the larger Midwestern states that swung to Bush in the last election.

Again, there is a double-standard on DU. DUers freely use the term "elitist", which is a code word for Northeast Urban liberal. But if you use the term "redneck", prepare to be flamed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
113. got me
I have little doubt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
116. The South Rules!

retyred in fla
“Good-Night Paul, Wherever You Are”

So I read this book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
118. Kennedy? His dad got him elected.
With a few mob connections. And he narrowly squeaked by a win. The Repubs have always thought that that election was really a Repub win. Gore 2000 was payback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #118
155. The 'pukes "paid back" JFK in Dallas.
They still assassinate their opponents - just less messy these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
121. It's not just the south. New England politicians aren't popular
in the Great Plains states or the Rocky Mountain states either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
125. Add me to the list of southerners who say: **** the South.
If my neighbors want to vote like imbeciles, let them. And then watch with amusement when they cry about their children consistently placin 47, 48, 49, and 50th in school score percentiles. And watch when they bemoan the fact that they have the highest teen pregnancy rates, and higher-than-average rates of spousal abuse, poverty, etc.

There are plenty of other states by which we can reach 270. Ohio, West Virginia, Arizona, New Hampshire, Missouri, & Nevada are all waiting for our attention.

Meanwhile, our nominee fakes an effort in Florida, Louisiana, Tennessee, & Arkansas. Show video of workers supposedly covering neighborhoods, telephone banks, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #125
165. Yes, have tokeep the Repugs busy and spending money in
those states so they can't take their money and resources and go gang up on our guy where it might make a diffference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushwakker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
126. That ends in November
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
135. It's about time we had a Northerner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #135
139. biased voter
can you say regional bias???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #139
140. Why must we always pander to one region-the South?
Hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #140
147. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #147
148. Please explain what you mean by your statements?
What exactly do we give minorities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CertusLaurus Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #148
151. Since my message was misunderstood and deleted.........
I will just paraphrase and say that the party should focus less on "group" issues and more on "American" issues. And no, they are NOT the same thing. When we speak in terms of group identity, we alienate everyone who doesn't belong to that group- they tune out the message.

Dean has been doing a better job than most of not letting a vocal minority (that's "minority" as in less-than-majority, not as in the various ethnic groups) dictate his agenda. That is they type of campaign that will attract ALL Americans, regardless of what group they are in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #140
189. uh
so we can get elected, that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
142. Interesting....
that's how F.D.R. felt when considering a southern running mate in 1944.
from Truman (pg. 297)... Sam Rayburn was a good man, Flynn and Roosevelt agreed, but Rayburn was from Texas, another southerner, and so "couldn't be considered." When they went through the list of the entire Senate, only one fitted the picture, Harry Truman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
144. FDR, JFK
I guess we should have their names removed from former Presidents. Incidentally, FDR did it four times, twice more than anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
145. The VP would need to bring balance
to any Northeasterner's ticket. JFK/LBJ, for example. I'm not sure it even has to be Southerner. Lower Midwesterners do have a comfort level with Southerners and Southwesterners. I could see a Kerry/Gephardt ticket, for example, nullifying some of the N/E negatives and boosting a Northern strategy at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CertusLaurus Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
146. You mean being Dukakis's Lieutenant Gov. won't seal the deal?...........
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

Say it aint so!

Until Ted Kennedy finally goes away, the thought of a Mass. Democrat as President will send Americans running to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #146
150. Ted Kennedy is my Senator and has done a GREAT job
fighting for the middle-class and poor. What part of that makes you want him to go away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CertusLaurus Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #150
152. We are talking about winning a NATIONAL campaign.......
so regardless of what Teddy has done for you, the rest of the country is sick of him, and he only hurts the party's image in the heartland and south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #152
153. Why is the country sick of the only Senator aside from Byrd
that calls Bush on his Bullshit? Could it be an innate prejudice toward anything Northeastern? And why do YOU speak for the rest of the country? Please.

If so it proves my point that a certain area of the country should get over the Civil War. That would be like me hating the British who literally fought my ancestors in my backyard during the Revolutionary war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CertusLaurus Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #153
156. The country was sick of TK long before...
Bush was ever in the picture.

Look, if you don't want to believe me, fine. But when Kerry loses big, maybe you will understand.

And this has nothing to do with the Civil War. You northerners seem to think that all we do down here is pout about losing. Fact is, I know that had we won, the entire world would be a crappy place to live because the US wouldn't have been strong enough to help out in WWI and WWII. The only time we think about the civil war is when people like you tell us we need to "get over it" as a way to divert from a different argument (just like you did).

The truth is that most Southerners could care less about the Civil War, Slavery, or Confederate flag (yes, including right-wing Republicans), and would very much like to get over the racial divide that still lingers (and I believe we will as soon as you holier-than-thou Northerners drop it as a political tool).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #156
161. "Holier-than-thou" Northerners
Hardly. How come us 'holier-than-thou' Yankees don't give two shits where a candidate is from, but the Dems always have to worry about running a Southerner to appeal to y'all down there? What is up with that? What else would it have to do with if not the Civil War?

Your hatred toward Yankees shows. Pretty sad. you're making quite an impression for being so new to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CertusLaurus Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #161
166. First, it should be noted that
I wasn't the one who first used the term "Yankee" in this discussion.

Second, the party runs Southerners because of simple Math. We can appeal to a broader range of American than a New Englander can.

The fact that you keep bringing up the civil war shows your complete lack of understanding of anyone South of Washington DC. I can honestly say that I was shocked when you brought it up because it is such a ridiculous thought. This is exactly why a Kerry-type Northeasterner can't win- you keep trying to tell us what we are thinking, and then proceed to tell us how to change our thinking, even though you were wrong in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #166
168. I am descended from a Southern family on my mother's side
My grandmother grew up in Tennessee until she came up North for college. My cousins live in Tennessee, Georgia, and South Carolina. They seem to have no problem with Northerners, but then again, they're liberal Democrats.

What is so vile about a New Englander, in your esteemed opinion? Why can't they appeal to a broad range of Americans? Have you ever been here? Lived here? Do you realize that rural parts of these six states have more in common with rural areas of Georgia and the cities where us "Northeast Urbal Elitist Libruls" reside? You have fallen for the right-wing propaganda that Northeasterners are somehow less 'American' than the rest of the country. What a crock of shit.

BTW I'm not for Kerry. But you obviously have an axe to grind...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CertusLaurus Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #168
173. Let's disect this post:
I never said anyone was "vile".
I never said "Northeast Urbal Elitist Libruls" (whatever that is).
I nver said "Northeasterners are somehow less 'American' than the rest of the country".

What I did say is that they are less electable. But let me be even more precise than that- ones from Mass. are less electable, due in good part to two other politicians from Mass- Dukakis and Ted Kennedy.
Why? I don't know. But then again, I don't have to know- it is simply a fact.

I'm glad to hear that you have cousins in the South, but I would venture to guess that if a Northerner told them that they needed to get over the Civil War (with absolutely no proof that they wern't over it already as you did) they would begin to have a problem with THAT northerner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #173
176. Simple Fact? Or your opinion?
It's a simple fact that many of these regional prejudices are fueled by the Republican party, thus scaring the Dems that a Northeasterner would be a poor choice for a nominee.

I have traveled all over the country and have encountered very little anti-Northeast prejudice. Most of the time people tell me how beautiful Boston/Massachusetts is.

I think it's not a matter of region but a matter of running the right Democrat.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #173
178. can I disect your post?
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 11:21 PM by flaminbats
What I did say is that they are less electable. But let me be even more precise than that- ones from Mass. are less electable, due in good part to two other politicians from Mass- Dukakis and Ted Kennedy.
Why? I don't know. But then again, I don't have to know- it is simply a fact.

I'm glad to hear that you have cousins in the South, but I would venture to guess that if a Northerner told them that they needed to get over the Civil War (with absolutely no proof that they wern't over it already as you did) they would begin to have a problem with THAT northerner.

Certain Victory for Dean!!


First, what do you say to people like FDR during the 40's who felt that all southerners were "unelectable"? Let me just submit to you that saying an individual is unelectable is just like saying another person is unbeatable, this is a myth with no foundation. Southerners continued to fight this myth in 1960, when they unsuccessfully rallied behind LBJ for the nomination. Instead...well, you know the rest. The first southern man since Zachary Taylor to win a Presidential Election was L.B.J. in 1964. Since then every President, with the exceptions of Nixon and Reagan, have all been elected from the south.

It means IMHO that this trend can be reversed...but it is really a question of when it shall be reversed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #161
177. What else could it have to do with?
You know, Rose, I live in rural Mississippi right now, and the only place where I regularly encounter people who seem preoccupied with the Civil War is DU.

It never comes up in discussions with my neighbors or my students here. My family and I rarely discuss it. Aside from the occasional crackpot letter to the editor, the subject seldom comes up in public discussion.

In my experience, most Southern resentment of "Yankees" comes from the sort of condescension that we get so many opportunities to see right here at DU. I lived briefly in the Northeast and grew to hate having to answer stupid questions from otherwise intelligent people who seemed to think that "The Beverly Hillbillies" was a documentary. (Of course, having affluent liberals who lived in lily-white communities and sent their children to private schools berate me for my home region's racism got old, too.) Any Southerner who has spent much time in the Northeast has encountered this sort of thing. I've had a number of professors from the Northeast who spent more time griping about their great misfortune in having had to come to such a benighted place than in discussing the subjects they were hired to teach. (And yet they never go elsewhere, even though people as brilliant as they imagine themselves to be must surely have top universities fighting over them.) And, of course, many of us have worked for imported Northern managers who assumed that we didn't have the sense to come in out of the rain.

Experiences like these have made the haughty, condescending Yankee an archetypal figure in the South. You don't have to go back to Gettysburg to explain it--it's based on current attitudes that many people still hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #177
180. I grew up in the south and take classes in the north...
and believe me...there are just as many if not more haughty, condescending types in the south than you ever encounter in the big northern cities. One reason I love the north as a native southerner, is you can count on honesty and directness in the north. In the south this is all veiled behind a stuck-up perception which many southerners are raised with as children, and this is that the southern way of life is the best way of life BY GOD!

LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT>>>:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #180
183. What's your point?
I don't recall saying that there are no snobs in the South or that "the southern way of life is the best way of life BY GOD."

Have you ever thought about responding to what people actually say? It take some thought, admittedly, but it does make a discussion much more interesting. Also, you might want to consider that "love it or leave it" sounds just as cretinous when we say it as it did when the pro-war crowd said it back during Vietnam. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #161
190. Civil War? Good grief
You seriously have no clue. The Civil War? C'mon, that is so out of left field. I have no bias towards the north. None. I would rather sit down and read a good northeastern newspaper than any rag we have down here.
I have never heard anyone reference the Civil War when discussing this issue until you mentioned it. It seems you may be jealous because of the shift of political power from one region to the other. I could care less. If all southern states were blue and all NE states were red i would want Ted Freakin' Kennedy to run for President. Whatever it takes to get a blue man in the white house. It's not a question of preference, it's a question of mathematics, ie the Electoral College.
That chip on your shoulder is going to be knocked right the hell off by Dick Cheney if you don't watch out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #153
157. Byrd didn't vote for Bush's bullshit. Kerry did.
I'd vote for Byrd if he were running.(though he's a little old for the job)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #152
169. Or what he has done for you?
Can I give some examples?

The Kennedy/Kassebaum Portability Act, which allows workers with pre-existing conditions to keep their health insurance through COBRA.

Or the Kennedy/Quayle Job Partnership Act, one of the best job training programs enacted.

Or another program Kennedy has fought for, IDEA..Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Strom Thurmond and Ted Kennedy co-sponsored legislation requiring warning labels on all alcoholic beverages. Ted Kennedy backed it because of his own well know experience, and Thurmond because his own daughter was killed by a drunken driver. Both he and Strom introduced the bill together on the floor of the Senate.

Those who make the best Senators aren't the ones who become big heroes, but keep their nose to the grid-stone by working for the voters while taking hell in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #169
171. The Kennedy family has a legacy of fighing for causes that benefit
the average person. Ted has been a great Senator, his son, nieces and nephews are involved in politics and charity work. His nephew, Joe, former Congressman from Boston, runs Citizens Oil with offers free and low-priced heating oil to the poor and elderly. There are many other examples of their assistance to the poor.

They put family 'dynasties' like the Bushes to shame!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #171
174. I'm a big fan of Joe!
I still remember when he played a big part of the Tsongas campaign back in 1992. It would be nice to see him run for office again. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #174
175. I worked on Joe's congressional campaign
he is a great guy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IowaBiker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
158. Tired of selling out to Dixie
Tired of the broken promises, empty moral values and scummy politics.

I'm tired of their "If you don't place a southerner #1 on the ticket, we won't play ball" games.

It's about time a real American ran for President -- someone from a place that doesn't fly the rebel flag.

--Iowa Biker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #158
179. "Real American"?
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 11:09 PM by QC
Do you not see the irony (or hypocrisy) in holding the same attitude as the people you're complaining about? Or, if not that, can't you at least see a problem in painting with such a broad brush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #179
191. clueless biker
he's clueless. ignore him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IowaBiker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #179
192. Pure Bigotry
"You gotta have a southerner to get the Southern vote."

"New England Liberal can't win!"

That is bigotry at its highest form.

Don't call me a hypocrite.


--Brian

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
160. If a northeasterner can't get elected, then why was JFK elected in 1960?
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 10:03 PM by ih8thegop
Or FDR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #160
163. it's a fear the Repukes put into the Dems
most of the Southerners with anti-Northern have other prejudices too and aren't going to vote Dem anyway. Personally, I'm sick of being held hostage by one area of the country. Too bad we can't have a Midwesterner or Californian as a nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpf113 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
162. A southern VP...
got JFK elected. Clark or Edwards are my bet for VP nom''s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
164. I don't understand "A" and "get." n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
184. What part of IT'S UP TO US
TO GET IT DONE don't you understand?

This is sick. It's all about every one of us getting to the poll, and taking a van full of friends who think just like us. If every DUer did that, we'd have a bazillion votes! w00t.

Stop worrying about the south and start registering people in states we CAN definitely win...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC