The GOP is Certain to Win in 2006 — Unless ...

[Khaotic]

It's pretty simple folks, either Independents, Progressives, Liberals, and Democrats, show some backbone, or people won't donate.

Why, oh WHY?!!!!! Should I or anyone else donate to Democrats or Greens when the system appears to be fixed?

Where's the election reform? Where's media reform?

Why is it that it's always the same tiny handful of representatives or senators that speak up, while the rest just sit there?

Below is a couple of paragraphs from an article I came across that really lets "us" have it where we deserve to have it.

Oh yeah, the link to the full article follows it.

My prediction is that '06 will see the fall of numerous Democratic governors, as well as the fall of Sen. Clinton. Forget the White House, she won't even hold New York. Read on ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The DNC was denied access to the voting machines and software, and to the tabulating computers in Ohio. Apparently on the assumption that what they cannot examine doesn’t exist, “the fraud factor” does not figure significantly into the DNC report.

And so the Democratic Party is cheerfully carrying on as if nothing has changed since Bill Clinton was re-elected in 1996. They are looking hopefully to taking back the Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008, as they fire up “the base,” and solicit still more contributions. They uncritically assume that all they need to do is get more voters to the polls than the GOP, and that the voting machines and compilers will do the rest – reliably and automatically.

Those poor, naive, fools!

Like Charlie Brown, they just assume that if they run up to the football once again, Lucy won’t snatch it away this time. But of course, GOP-Lucy will do just that, thanks to the Democrats’ reliable gullibility.



Full Article: http://www.oldamericancentury.org/crisis_035.htm

[blm]

1. Well, we have to hope that the DNC and Dean will expose the GOP control of

most of the voting machines. Our job is to make certain he takes this as seriously as needed.

[ibegurpard]

2. Comes a point where you have to wonder if it's stupidity or complicitness

I still haven't decided which one.

[Trish1168]

3. If you google about Sibel Edmonds....you think complicity

She's said that the crimes committed against our country were performed by a bipartisan group of people. It seems to me that if you want to keep a secret from coming out, you'd better control the government so there won't be independent investigations.

Sibel Edmonds talks about money laundered from drug sources going both into the pockets of politicians and to the 9/11 hijackers. And if you read Tom Flocco (his assertions are outlandish, but I think anything is possible)....he suggests that there's been a few hundred billion (maybe even 3 trillion, depending on the accounting) that has been stolen from tax payers. Again, it sounds like a bipartisan theft of money. He also talks about control over 20-30 congressmen through blackmail (child molestation at parties...photos taken).

I don't know how much is true. All I know is that I suspect complicity of dems, with regard to the vote fraud.

[Robeson]

4. Probably a little of both....

...De-nial ain't just a river in Egypt.