Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"It's Hitting the fan" Plame not only listed (S) on memo but.(SNF)..video

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:58 AM
Original message
"It's Hitting the fan" Plame not only listed (S) on memo but.(SNF)..video
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 11:25 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
listed as "top secert" and (SNF)"Secret, No Foreign,"..right next to her name - "Secret, No Foreign,"..which means foriegn intelligence even our allies

http://www.crooksandliars.com/



Breaking News On Treasonous-Rove Case-VIDEO
Yellow Dog Blog: Countdown with Keith Olbermann:

The Wall Street Journal will break the news tomorrow that not only was the damning State Department memo reported today labeled "secret," it was classified as "top secret."

And, according to WSJ National Political Editor John Harwood, the memo also lists the Plame revelation as "SNF," or "Secret, No Foreign," in terms of parties to whom the information can or cannot be disclosed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Whoo-hoo! Kickin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveFool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. holy moly!
Buy popcorn futures! Orville Reddenbacher stock!

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. You shouldaa seen it Doug - suds everywhere - kaBOOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. A similar story was reported yesterday on NPR- interviewed W. Pincus
of the Washington Post, Here's the link:

Govt. Memo Marked Plame's Identity as 'Secret'



Listen to this story (at the link above)

All Things Considered, July 21, 2005 · A 2003 State Department memo clearly indicated Valerie Plame's identity was to be kept secret, according to a Washington Post story. Plame, wife of Ambassador Joseph Wilson, is the CIA officer whose identity was made public in a leak to the press. President Bush's adviser, Karl Rove, has been taken to task for his off-the-record conversations with reporters about Plame.

Some critics accuse Rove of breaking the law. They say he leaked Plame's identity in retaliation for husband Joseph Wilson's refusal to back the Bush Administration's claims about Iraq. Hear Melissa Block and Walter Pincus of The Washington Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Damn liberal Wall Street Journal!
Will Shammity and El-Puke-bo diss it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. You can depend on that.
They will find some way to discredit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Whole Memo Was Secret
On NPR yesterday, they said the entire memo was full of items marked secret - it wasn't just one paragraph that someone could have missed the notation for secret.

Therefore, anything in the memo should have been handled carefully.

The designation "secret" is higher than "classified."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. couldn't have been Top Secret (if THEY all knew!)
it would seem the British govt knew too? Do we want a government that is this leaky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. No, Secret is higher than Confidential
Classified information can be Confidential, Secret or Top Secret.

Confidential information can be expected to cause damage to the national security if it gets into the wrong hands.

Secret information can be expected to cause serious damage to the national security if it gets into the wrong hands.

Top Secret information can be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security if improperly released.

There's also a For Official Use Only (FOUO) marking. It's not a classification, but it covers things civilians don't need to know.

Okay, let's play devil's advocate and pretend that the memo was completely unclassified except for one itty-bitty lil' ol' paragraph that says Valerie Wilson is a spy working undercover. What I would have done, and what most people would have done, is to create an FOUO document referencing a separate classified appendix containing the offiending paragraph. This is easy, quick, legal and fulfills the government mantra to create as little classified information as you can. Plus, it broadens the distribution of the unclassified main document.

Now let's say I'm ginning up a thirteen-page memo that will contain Secret paragraphs. This document needs a front and back cover that contain no classified information. Both say Secret at top and bottom. Pages containing secret paragraphs will be marked Secret at top and bottom on both the front and back sides. Every other page in the document also needs to be marked. You can either put the highest classification in the book on every page, or mark each page with the highest classification contained on either side of that page. I don't know why you get the second option--no one does it. It's easier and just as protective to put "Secret" at the top and bottom of every page in the book even if a particular page doesn't have any Secret information on it. Now for the fun part: you have to mark each paragraph with the highest classification contained within it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ooops. Top Secret huh?
Gee wiz beaver, you're gonna get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Secret (noun): something you only tell a few people
(courtesy of the White House New Unabridged Dictionary)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. reporters, you mean. 8^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. wrong definition
Here's the government definition: information in which the unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. They really should just declassify the document.
And lots of other information, while they're at it. After all, so much of it has been leaked by non-whistleblowers.

As well as revoke the rules governing grand jury testimony secrecy.

We're obviously all in favor of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janetle Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. I heard spin ......
....yesterday that the "S" meant 'sensitive' which doesn't sound as significant as SECRET. It might have been John McCain on Hardball but I can't remember who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. "C"/Confidential; "S"/Secret; "TS"/Top Secret. Caveat: there are
higher desinations and sub-designations, ie, "Eyes Only", etc.

I never got above TS, and to this day, would never discuss classified material w/anyone w/o the need to know...even though it is 30+ years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. C'mon...Who Killed Kennedy? I Won't Tell Anyone
I really need to know. That's even bigger than just "need to know."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If I told you...
I'd have to kill you...:dilemma:....:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. No one doubted
The power and popularity of JFK and the fact that that power could only be suppressed in one way! The handling of any investigation about his death is very much like any investigation today within the power of republicans!
If they could give Gannon a lifetime vacation, they can buy ANYTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon2 Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Absolutely Correct, rasputin1952
Any attempt to make the (S) designation other than "Secret" is, like the "Plame wasn't really undercover" story, absolute, unadulterated GOP bull-S-hit. One caveat though: I have seen things in Tom Clancy novels that I could be imprisoned for revealing, so as usual with these crooks, how this finally shakes out will depend on who you know and who you bxxw. I'm hoping Fitzgerald has them dead to rights and that Bolton gets his ass handed to him as well in the bargain.

Then it's time to go after the Big Game...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. John McCain is doing his party to run damage control for King Karl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. That's bs
Speaking as a former intel/counterintel person here, if a paragraph has a (S) in front of it, it's secret. There is no other interpretation.

If it were sensitive unclassified information it would have other specific markings. (FOUO - for official use only, for example.) The markings are very specific, and believe me, nobody who works with that stuff is confused about what (S) means at the start of a paragraph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. "Nobody who works with that stuff is confused... "
I can hear their latest defensive talking point now: "We WERE confused, because we don't usually work with that stuff!" Which is, of course, even deeper bullshit, because that means people who had no business looking at ANY of that stuff had access. Secret or not, I tend to believe a lot of folks with inadequate clearance were freely able to view and use info their eyes should never have seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. rotten traitors.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. At the hearing today
Schummer said that the DOJ didn't launch the Plame investigation because of the Dems making it a political issue. He said that it was the CIA who demanded that the DOJ investigate this leak. That this incident was a major breach as far as the CIA was concerned. No wonder they've got Goss in there shredding stuff as fast as he can.

I've also heard a rumor that Tenet may be talking to the Grand Jury. Let's hope this is true.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. re-play Hearing Public Disclosure of Covert Agents is on NOW..... CSpan
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 03:27 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I really want to see that from the beginning, if CSPAN says...
...when they are going to replay it again, could you send me a Private Message? :shrug:

That would be awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. NPR also had an Excellent Interview last Sunday on WESUN...
...with Los Angeles Times reporter Greg Miller, he really explains the "issues" involved in great and fascinating detail.

Well worth the 6 minutes 13 seconds it takes to hear it.

The 'Fragile Mosaic' of Establishing CIA Covers



Listen to this story (at link above)

Weekend Edition - Sunday, July 17, 2005 · Los Angeles Times reporter Greg Miller discusses the "fragile mosaic" of deception necessary to shield the identity of CIA operatives such as Valerie Plame. An investigation is under way to determine who in the Bush administration leaked her name to reporters. Host Liane Hansen speaks with Miller.


<http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4757713>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalVoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poetsdream Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm liking this story more and more!!
What's that I smell? I think it's fear, and it's coming from the white house...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Welcome to DU! I think you smell a skunk. Or two (hundred).
Glad you're here. Now get to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
29. Question....
So how does that relate, to people with dual citizenships, in gov't service....such as Ari Fleisher, about whom I have read accounts saying he was seen and heard, openly discussing said memo...
windbreeze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. hey talk about dual citizenship...what about dusl heads of DOD boards...
Richard Perle was on the US Defense Board at the same time he was on the Israeli Defense Board?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Welcome to DU!
We need you - and all the help/activism/truth-telling you can give.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC