Like Watergate, the outing of Valerie Plame has implications far beyond the literal infraction. Of course, it reveals a long pattern of vicious political skullduggery on the part of Karl Rove and swift White House revenge against any who cross its path.
It would be a grave mistake, though, to focus the attention on Rove's comeuppance. That would certainly be a bonus to Democrats still licking their wounds. And it feeds into the mindset of the media protecting its own (Miller and Cooper) by pursuing this story. But it is not the issue at hand.
The issue at hand is
why revenge went to such extreme lengths - far beyond even the Swift Boat or character assassins.
The revenge was extreme because the stakes were so high.
After years of backroom sweat and millions and millions of dollars to groups like Chalabi's INC, the plans for invasion were finally clicking along. The architects of the invasion were finally going to see over a decade of work come to fruition. Chief among those architects were Cheney, Perle, Wolfowitz, and Wolfowitz's former student and Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby.
Libby is almost certainly the first person to contact the media with Plame's identity.
For one quick indication (amongst many):
Appearing on Wednesday's "Buchanan & Press," Johnson told the hosts, "I know the name of the person that spoke with Bob Novak," and that the person worked "at the White House," and more specifically, "in the Old Executive Office Buildings." The vice president's office is located inside the Old Executive Office Building.
And when Buchanan asked Johnson point-blank, "Scooter Libby. Now, is Scooter Libby the name you heard?" Johnson said simply, "I'm not going to comment on that."http://fairuse.1accesshost.com/news1/libby.htmlDid Libby out Plame for political revenge? Yes, but not in the public sense that Rove had. Not only was Wilson a blight on the President's name, but he threatened to derail a media asking few questions. At the time, defectors like Curveball were taken at their word over WMDs (except by the CIA and State Dept.), 70% of Americans believed Saddam was involved in 9/11, and no one looked too closely at the "cakewalk" scenarios.
If too much credence was given to Wilson's assertions, other questions might arise - leaving the house of cards extremely vulnerable. By the information we have pieced together from reports after the invasion, it was clear that the White House knew how tenuous their claims were:
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0804-11.htmThe goal of the White House hawks was regime change at any cost (figuratively and literally), and the intelligence was "fixed" to sell the war as one of necessity.
Libby, like Cheney, was given virtually free access to CIA intelligence and knew that both the CIA and State Dept. did not believe Iraq to be an urgent issue. But the hawks looked down upon the two groups from day one as too soft. A figure like Wilson was not only soft, but had openly betrayed the administration by taking the fight into the public realm. In the eyes of an extremely secretive group, that was an inexcusable crime on part of the liberal and flamboyant Wilson.
The outing of Valerie Plame should not be limited to revenge for publicly accusing the President of lying in the State of the Union (the "16 words"). If the matter is left to go no further, it will be an injustice to the way future wars are fought by the United States. If Libby's part is downplayed, it will rob the entire matter of its martial context and render it a melodrama in the King's court.
Republican's who claim this is a "tempest in a teapot" will be proved right.