Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: Republicans Push for Voter-Friendly Bills

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:26 AM
Original message
WSJ: Republicans Push for Voter-Friendly Bills
Republicans Push for Voter-Friendly Bills

Energy, Highway Measures Are Viewed as a Tonic Amid Thorny Issues of Iraq, Social Security

By CHRISTOPHER COOPER
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
June 14, 2005; Page A4

WASHINGTON -- Republicans, increasingly worried that they are being dragged down by antipathy over the tough issues of Iraq and Social Security, are calling on the White House to push harder on more-voter-friendly legislation, with energy and highway bills at the top of their wish list.

Though White House aides maintain that Democrats have more to lose if Washington devolves into gridlock, some administration officials agree that passage of a few bread-and-butter bills might be the perfect tonic for both the president and Republican lawmakers who face election next year.

(snip)

Lawmakers hope part of the answer will come from two pieces of legislation linked to constituents' economic concerns. The energy bill, which has passed the House and reaches the Senate floor in a different form this week, would represent a step toward addressing gasoline prices, which polls show are a concern for voters. And the highway bill, now in a House-Senate conference, would finance nearly $300 billion of infrastructure projects at a time when Americans are increasingly fearful about the economy.

Yet President Bush has threatened to veto the highway bill as too expensive. And both efforts could be overtaken by a summer battle over the Supreme Court, if Chief Justice William Rehnquist retires. Fighting over Mr. Bush's judicial nominees, and his choice of John Bolton to be United Nations ambassador, has occupied much of the Senate's time in recent weeks.

(snip)


Some Republican lawmakers are keeping their distance from Mr. Bush's Social Security initiative or his position on other issues. Polls show the public at odds with the president's opposition to legislation expanding funding for embryonic stem-cell research, which has passed the Republican-controlled House and may reach the Senate floor soon.

(snip)

---- Brody Mullins contributed to this article.

Write to Christopher Cooper at [email protected]

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB111870458225258574,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well then get to it and do the right thing.
Pass the voter verified paper ballot bill, and stop obstructing justice. All republican legislatures need to stop giving evil a free pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Did Bush veto the stem-cell bill yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not yet. I don't think that the Senate voted on it yet n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC