Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Feinstein urges Senate leaders to take up stem cell bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 08:10 PM
Original message
Senator Feinstein urges Senate leaders to take up stem cell bill
Edited on Wed May-25-05 08:13 PM by Clarkie1
May 25, 2005

Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today called on the Senate leadership to have a vote on legislation to expand Federal stem cell research.

Senator Feinstein joined Senators Arlen Specter (R-Penn.), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Gordon H. Smith (R-Ore.) and Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) at a news conference today to push for the Senate to take up and pass legislation to expand Federal stem cell research sponsored by Representatives Mike Castle (R-Del.) and Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) that was approved by the House of Representatives.

The legislation would allow federal funding for stem cell research using stem cell lines derived under strict ethical requirements from excess in vitro fertilization embryos, regardless of the date they were derived. President Bush has threatened to veto this legislation.

Following is a statement by Senator Feinstein:

“I am grateful for Representatives Castle and DeGette and their leadership in getting stem cell legislation passed in the House. They’ve shown that Republicans and Democrats working together can in fact do very good things.

Let’s look back to 2001. In 2001 President Bush authorized the release of 78 stem cell lines. The problem is they have all become contaminated with mouse feeder cells. Therefore none of them are useful for treating or curing diseases in humans. Some have said, ‘Why haven’t researchers applied for these stem cell lines?’ The reason is because they are contaminated and they are not viable for human research.

So this is really the first opportunity we have now to see that this kind of research begins in the United States . I join with my colleagues in urging the Majority Leader to bring the House bill to the floor. We should then pass that House bill. We should send it to the President. And we should strongly make the arguments.

South Korea recently announced its advances in human stem cell research. I think that the one thing they show is that the possibility of what stem cell research can accomplish is a large possibility, and it is, in fact, a probability.

California passed Proposition 71 with a dominant majority last November to create a $3 billion stem cell research center. At least five other states are following.

It should be very clear that a majority of American people want to see this research go ahead. I think the argument has been made that this isn’t human life. A decision has already been made to discard the embryos that are eligible for research under this bill. These embryos are never going to become a child.

So I think this is the soundest first step we can take. The fact that it was done in the House, which generally is much more conservative than the Senate on these matters, adds a line of strength that we haven’t had in this debate before.

My very simple hope is that it won’t be long before this bill will be on the floor of the Senate. And then hopefully, we will be able to go and talk to the President of the United States . And hopefully we will be able to convince him not to veto this bill, because this bill is really in the interest of the people of the United States , particularly the millions who are facing catastrophic and devastating disease.”

http://feinstein.senate.gov/05releases/r-stemcll-nuser525.htm

This issue could well be the undoing of the religious extremist wing of the Republican Party. Unfortunately, since Bush isn't going to run again he has nothing to lose by a cruel and cynical veto of the bill (does he really even care what his ratings are now?). Instead of doing the right and compassionate thing (as a true compassionate conservative would do) I suspect he will probably remain loyal as dog to the religious wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kaygore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gosh, there is a second senator from California
I thought there was only that courageous Barbara Boxer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Boxer is my favorite...
by every once in awhile Feinstein does something that impresses as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaygore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree
Boxer takes her job seriously and takes being a Democrat seriously AND she takes the welfare of her constituents seriously--how very refreshing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC