Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC Gets Qu'ran desecration wrong

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 12:40 PM
Original message
BBC Gets Qu'ran desecration wrong
Even the BBC is getting this one wrong. In the article on Laura * in Jerusalem and in the BBC World Service radio accounts of the Newsweek "retraction", they've been getting the facts wrong.

Here's what I wrote the BBC:

Re: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4570993.stm

---------------------------------------------

Please, please, please start getting the facts RIGHT. Stop saying that Newsweek's weak-willed retraction of one article means that the facts of the Qu'ran desecrations by U.S. interrogators at GITMO and elsewhere are false.

From your web article (and audio reports I've heard on BBC radio here in the US): (Desecration of the Qu'ran) "was a reference to allegations - now retracted - by American magazine Newsweek that US officials at the Guantanamo Bay detention centre in Cuba had desecrated the Muslim holy book."

Newsweek is not the only source for infomation about the facts that the Qu'ran has been desecrated by U.S. interrogators. Even Newsweek's "retraction" centered around an anonymous source, NOT THE FACTS.

For more information, please refer to our national treasure Molly Ivin's fuller account of this issue: http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/22026 /

I've been very dissapointed with your lazy reporting on this issue. It's atypical for an organization as trustworthy as you have been to be so sloppy in your reporting.

---------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC