Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where Sens stand on the nuclear option...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 09:51 PM
Original message
Where Sens stand on the nuclear option...
Bitch-boy Fristy is sounding more and more like he's set on launching the nuke strike to end filibusters. Thinking in terms of sheer gamesmanship, this is a HUGE risk . That is, it's far from clear that he even have the votes necessary to pull off the 50 votes.

Off the top of my head, these may be the wavering repugs -

Chafee
Collins
DeWine
Hagel
McCain
Snowe
Specter

Ben Nelson may be the only Dem on the fence.

Anyone have links or information as to which Sens are "in play"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would bet that
Specter, Hagel, and DeWine all go nuclear when push comes to shove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think you're wrong about Spector.
My guess is that those who have been in the Senate for a long time will not go for it. They realize they will not be in the majority forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Specter owes his ass to Bush and Santorum now
Edited on Thu Apr-14-05 11:48 PM by tritsofme
Because if they looked the other way he would have been defeated in the primary.

Despite the fact that he is generally a moderate, I really don't even consider Specter to be a factor when I think about Republicans that might defect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. You may be right, but, not trying to be mean, did you see him
when he chaired a hearing a few days ago? I had initially forgotten about him announcing he had cancer, and when the cpsan camera first showed him up close, I yelled, "Oh my God, what's wrong with him?" I guess he must have been taking radioligy treatments, and he looks terrible. He's still pretty moderate from everything I eard him say at that hearing. He just might also be thinking about his own mortality, and vote for what he believes is best.

I guess we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineYooper Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I called Snowe's office on this topic.
The staffer I talked to was very receptive, but I don't know if that's indicative of the senator's stand...

I called Collins' office as well, and was treated politely, but got a different sense from the conversation- just my impressions, of course though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. McCain told Tweety tonight
that he will not support the nuclear option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. McCain won't support it
and I'm guessing because he's one of the most vulnerable Republican senators Chaffee will be against it.

How exactly could Ben Nelson be on the fense about this. One other question do we need 50 votes or 51 to shoot this down, because it could make a key difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I've been wondering that too
and no one I've talked to seems to know for sure.

It would seem logical that they only need 50 votes for Cheney to break the tie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Nelson is likely THE most vulnerable Dem up for re-election and he sits
in a hard red state. He's recently sent signals of wanting "a compromise" on the issue, whatever the fuck that means.

http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/041305/nelson.html

I fear that Conrad, Dorgan, Lincoln, and Pryor are three others that could swing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not Dorgan
Edited on Fri Apr-15-05 09:53 AM by Mass
He has been against the nuclear option for a while now and is not for reelection for another 6 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave Sund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Nelson's a smart man
He's NOT going to sandbag his party for the purposes of winning, though. Nelson is doing this to send signals to Nebraskans that he tried to compromise, but Frist wouldn't have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. We NEED 51 to stop the rule-change. Chain-Knee will break the tie if nec.
That is, in order to over-rule the pariliamentarian who will declare the filibuster constutitional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Last time I saw McCain on TV he was wavering.
Not very good sign. He just got reelected and should be a safe bet, but he wants to run for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. He has continually said he will not support the nuclear option
Last nite on Hardball was most recent.

The Repubs have spent the past week sticking needles in a doll that resembles him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. They keep calling it "The Nuclear Option" on CM.
It's like they have to make it sound more interesting for the masses or something. Lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. According to kos, there are 7 swing votes, of which we need 4.
They are -

Collins (ME)
Hagel (NE)
Snowe (ME)
Sununu (NH)
Gregg (NH)
Lugar (IN)
Warner (VA)

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/4/15/143713/273


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Of those 4 I'd
Definetely say Collins and Snowe were the best targets I'm not too familiar with the two Senators from NH, I don't think we'd be able to get Warner on our side, I don't know about Lugar and Hagel.

I'm kinda dissapointed that Specter hasn't come over to our side. I know you guys said he owes Bush and Santorum but with his health problems and his age I can't see any way this isn't his last term, in fact I'm not even sure he'll finish this term. So with that you'd think he'd do whatever he felt was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC