Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1988 Election -- What Happened?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:04 PM
Original message
1988 Election -- What Happened?
Edited on Sun Apr-10-05 01:05 PM by mcd1982
I am reading Jim Wright's book "Balance of Power" and I am APPALLED by the whole Central American mess caused by the Reagan administration!!!

How they heck did Bush get elected in 1988 with all of the illegal wars that he was (should have been) tainted by? The more I read, the more outraged I get!

How is Reagan's presidency not tainted severely by this? Why did VP Bush not suffer b/c of this? Why the heck is he the savior of the conservatives? Probably b/c he lied and cheated, which resulted in deaths, like the best of them.

GRRR!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Same story, earlier verse
Edited on Sun Apr-10-05 01:12 PM by yankeedem
Mike Dukakis posing in stupid looking photos (the one in the tank)
Flat out lies on wedge issues like Willie Horton (who was furloughed not under Dukakis laws, but Ed King), Democratic party unwilling to make Poppys role in Iran/Contra an issue.




Edit to add pictures of two Massachusetts Democrats who had STUPID handlers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yeah...
I knew of the tank photo & the Horton ad, but my goodness, they don't even compare to the illegality of Iran-Contra & Co.!!!

I can't believe the Democratic Party did not stand up and call a spade a spade!

When will we ever learn our lesson....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. meh..
I dont think you can compare the weird spacesuit photo op with the tank photo op. Every candidate does a couple stupid photo ops, but the reason the tank one was so effective was that it so perfect represented everyone's reservations about Dukakis. Most people never even saw those pictures of Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It is a fair comparison because
Kerry and Dukakis had the same type of hamhanded advisors who let him be photographed that way. His image wasn't managed well from day 1, and the "bunny suit" picture just played into it. That it wasn't trumpeted like the Dukakis picture is fortunate, but it still is a symptom of the lack of image making that plagued both of their campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. weak candidates and campaigns in 80 and 84
led to stupidly large Reagan victories, and although Dukakis initally ran a good campaign and was himself a good candidate, his campaign eventually sagged and Reagan came out for Bush heavily, swinging California for Bush, and Bentsen on the ticket couldn't deliver Texas for Dukakis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. The same bunch of chicken-hawk monsters have been doing....
...it in Afghanistan and Iraq, probably had a big part in 9-11 and will be disrupting Iran and North Korea within the next 12 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. didn't...
Mary Beth Cahill run Mondale's campaign? I'm pretty sure she's run losing presidential races before! Why do we keep using the same darn consultants! To borrow from Shakespeare, we need to kill all the damn consultants!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dukakis had an absolutely brilliant consultant
who he trusted but had to fire him when it was shown he had lied about distributing a video of Biden being a plageurist. That left him with Estrich who wasn't a brilliant consultant and whom he didn't trust. Dukakis rehired his consultant in October and might have won had he had a few more days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Even the S&L scandal was covered up by a media screaming, "FLAG BURNING!"
Operatives...probably the DelGaudio brothers...orchestrated flag-burning events by faux leftists that just happened to coincide with Bush1's campaign route. They would show up a week or so early to burn flags in the public squares and Poppy would come later to pronounce his campaign aginst flag-burning.

Sickening, but, between the flag-burning and dirty song lyrics, scandals like the S&L, IranContra, BCCI, and the illegal wars in Central America couldn't get proper media examination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. 1988 was an election Dukakis should have won
He had a lead and Bush went on the attack and Dukakis didn't respond. Flag burning, ACLU membership, Willie Horton, a whole lot of diversionary trivialities became the focus of the campaign because Bush wanted them to be and Dukakis couldn't or wouldn't defend himself.

Some elections are over before they start like Clinton-Dole or Reagan-Mondale, but some could go either way, and 1988 should have gone Dukakis' way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Demise of the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE Happened


4995
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. He are your answers
Edited on Sun Apr-10-05 02:05 PM by mrdmk
The S&L mess not only had the Republicans up to it in their tonsils, but also the Democrats of our time.

<snip>
This allegation set off a series of investigations by the California government, the United States Department of Justice, and the Senate Ethics Committee. The ethics committee's investigation focused on five senators: Alan MacG. Cranston (D-Calif.); Dennis W. DeConcini (D-Ariz.); John H. Glenn Jr. (D-Ohio); John S. McCain III (R-Ariz.); and Donald W. Riegle Jr. (D-Mich), who became known as the Keating Five.
<end of snip>
link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_five

As a side note there was also a problem with House Members and Senators floating checks at the Congressional Post Office. The impression that the media was giving at the time was that everybody was crooked.

The BCCI was being investigated by a young Senator named John Kerry. This was being portrayed by media as a Senator Kerry looking for something that was not there and he is wasting every bodies time. This did not help the Democrats at the time. That time would be 1992, thus helping Mr. Bill Clinton to office.

<snip>
In 1992, United States Senators John Kerry and Senator Hank Brown co-authored a report on BCCI which was delivered to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
<end of snip>
link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_Credit_and_Commerce_International

Here is a link of the report
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/

The Iran Contra report did not come out until 1993 just in time for Mr. George Bush Sr. to pardon everyone involved just as he was leaving office. Although the scandal was known of in 1988 a) It was very difficult for U.S. citizens to believe b) Up to the time of the report most of the media played it off as muck raking and at the time of the report this was old news that the media more or less gave a cursory passing to.

Here is a link of the report
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/

Further note, Mr. Bush Jr. by executive order has buried all of the executive government papers concerning these matters with an executive order. I forget which one, there were so many.

As a side some of the persons involed in the Iran Contra are employed by Mr. Bush Jr. at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Umm...
Dukakis was short and no one liked him.

Honestly, I think what happened was, after the bad streak Dem pres candidates seemed to go through in the eighties, they really couldn't get a really good candidate to go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Dukakis was poorly managed
The tank photo as most will mention is only one of several blunders. At one point I think he led poppy by some 19 points. Poppy also had a good convention performance but that shouldn't have been enough to make up 19 points. Dukakis should've won handidly, his blunders lost it for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC