Congress may Cut Food Aid to Poor, but Not Large Corporate Farm Subsidies!

[flpoljunkie]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28449-2005Mar11.html

By LIBBY QUAID
The Associated Press
Friday, March 11, 2005; 10:35 PM

WASHINGTON - Cuts in food programs for the poor are getting support in Congress as an alternative to President Bush's idea of slicing billions of dollars from the payments that go to large farm operations.

Senior Republicans in both the House and Senate are open to small reductions in farm subsidies, but they adamantly oppose the deep cuts sought by Bush to hold down future federal deficits.

The president wants to lower the maximum subsidies that can be collected each year by any one farm operation from $360,000 to $250,000. He also asked Congress to cut by 5 percent all farm payments, and he wants to close loopholes that enable some growers to annually collect millions of dollars in subsidies.

Instead, Republican committee chairmen are looking to carve savings from nutrition and land conservation programs that are also run by the Agriculture Department. The government is projected to spend $52 billion this year on nutrition programs like food stamps, school lunches and special aid to low-income pregnant women and children. Farm subsidies will total less than half that, $24 billion.

Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., said the $36 billion food stamp program is a good place to look for savings.

more...it gets worse, "compassionate conservatism" at its finest! Gotta pay for those tax cuts for the top 1%, you know.

[Erika]

1. Robbing the poor to give to the rich

It's the new Republican message. A redistribution of wealth that they can go along with.

[Toronto Ron]

2. Not surprised. As bad as b*sh is,

there are Republican Senators that almost make him seem human. From wingnuts like Santorum, Brownback, Demint, and Coborn to plain old evil corporate pieces of shit like Chambliss, McConnell, Burr, Frist. What a revolting lot.