Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Petition to send to Congess for verifiable Voting Law:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 06:13 PM
Original message
Petition to send to Congess for verifiable Voting Law:
From moveon.org:

Subject: We need to repair the vote now

Hi,

After the last two presidential elections, it's incredibly important to repair our election system. We need to guarantee paper printouts for electronic voting machines, cut long lines, and prohibit partisan election officials.

There's lots of legislation in Congress to do just that, and we need to demand our representatives pass it immediately.

I just signed a petition to Congress. Can you join me by signing this petition?

http://www.moveonpac.org/repairthevote/

This is urgent because states are preparing to spend over a billion dollars on new electronic voting machines. Unless Congress requires paper printouts now, we'll be stuck with expensive machines that can't do a simple recount.

I hope you'll sign this petition to Congress:

http://www.moveonpac.org/repairthevote/

If you are so inclined, please fgo to the site and sign the Petition.

Thanks,

Ras
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bardgal Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is useless! The ONLY solution is to BAN E-VOTING!
This petition is a joke. Getting a paper receipt is nothing more than a false panacea. It won't guard against e-fraud.

So what if you have your little piece of paper when the thieves will never allow a close enough election to warrant a recount?

PAPER ONLY. PUBLIC OVERSIGHT. OPEN VOTE COUNTING.

that's the ONLY acceptable solution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But your not going to stop e-voting....we still need something to
verify ballots.

Sometimes, you have to take what you can get...this certainly beats the alternative...RW control over every aspect of our voting procedure.

You can blow all the steam you want, but action is all that will accomplish anything...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaglenetsupport Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes we can stop e-voting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Tell me HOW....If you have answers, I'll back them...
but a blanket statement will do little more than incite more questions.

What do you know that I don't?

Input please...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaglenetsupport Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. One of the easiest things to do
Compared to talking your senator into it.

Let's say your from California, and for the sake of argument let's say there is only one thing (about ten really) wrong, computers, and you wanted paper ballots only. Form a legal petition at the secretary of states office and ask the voters "Should the people of California eliminate computers from collecting elections information and replace them with paper only hand counted ballots?" Yes or No. It'll win because we nearly have a majority on the issue already before any voter education or campaigning has even begun.

Qualifying it is nothing, people will sign anything to get a vote on an issue. File in ten states on the same day and you create a national agenda around the issue, insuring financial and political support.
This isn't a blanket statement without a merit. See eight prohibition initiatives, 1931. They had a good time doing it, made it into a party, and coined the term block parties.

Frankly I'm a little burned out on these, Write your congressmen movies, it's a re-run. HELLOOO, THEY AREN'T LISTENING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Making the E-voting code open source, let everyone see it.
God knows how many programmers are in this country, one is bound to open their big fat mouth if something is wrong.

E-voting is cheaper and easier. It just has to be done right. It can't have any stupid windows OS with a hush hush program executable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaglenetsupport Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. E-voting is not cheaper is certainly not easier
It's true that it could be done. Banks do it. But they're setting up systems that generate a profit and run every day and therefore can support an IT security department.. We're talking here a system that will run one day every two years. Little old ladies in tennis shoes don't cost anything. And that sweet smile would never rip you off.

Another one they run all the time. It'll take forever to count all those votes. the typical precinct with 1-2000 voters can be counted in 30-40 minutes. Show me someone that says otherwise and I'll show someone that hasn't worked the pols or is a lie'in repub disinformation agent.

Just for the record department, $45 Million in paper currency was stolen last year while $550 million was stolen electronically.

And Hell how you going to secure all those either nets given the fact that insiders invariably are involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaglenetsupport Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Disgusting, I can't believe moveon is joining in
with the republiclones and DLC.

They need to research this kind of thing before they sign on to it. I'm heading over there to bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Done. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC