Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSM now hot after Gannon story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 09:43 PM
Original message
MSM now hot after Gannon story
About damn time.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p=103

Mainstream press picks up pace on Gannon; New Yorker gets into the game

Heat from press rises on White House over Gannon


By John Byrne | RAW STORY Editor

A broad array of mainstream publications and television networks are aggressively pursuing various angles of the burgeoning scandal surrounding discredited White House reporter Jeff Gannon, RAW STORY has learned.

Washington sources tell RAW STORY that calls are flying around the District as much of the mainstream press seeks to catch up with online reporting–including some from such prestigious magazines as The New Yorker.

The wire services have also begun digging, sources say, which could place the Gannon scandal in hundreds of smaller newspapers across America.

Some suggest that the mainstream media–which initially left blogs and online outlets like this site to flesh out the story–are now seeking to reestablish their grasp and perhaps break new elements of it themselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sex sells.
Forget all that WMD stuff. Who cares? We don't have a MSM media or a corporate media--we have a plain old tabloid media. An equal blend of right-wing patriotism and drooling voyeurism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. If the MSM cares about ratings and selling papers
I don't how they COULD ignore Gannongate. It should be a no-brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. ....goody goody, now watch the fucking brain dead freepers shut up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. This really is so sick
If there wasn't a sex angle to this story it would be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LosinIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You are correct, but damn it, I don't care
Edited on Sat Feb-19-05 10:23 PM by LosinIt
these fuckers have gotten a pass from the media for so long, it's about time. If the wire services pick it up, it'll even be in the Watertown Daily Times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The thing for me about this story is the question of access
we know why he got in, i love hearing the media peopel saying..."How did he pass the background checks>" I don't know if they're being cheeky or serious. We know why he passed the beckground check....there wasn't one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm afraid if the MSM doesn't start asking some hard questions
we may never know how or why he got access.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. i think we know why, no it's finding out the who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Even without the sex angle this story goes to prove how sleazy
this administration is, the sex angle isn't the crux of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let me know if any blowdried bobblehead on the TV news picks it up
I doubt they will, since they're in the same business that Jimmyjeff is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hey, why not? It's a three day weekend, so they'll run with it.
And by Tuesday morning, they'll make sure it's never aired on TV again :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. this time the internet will prevail
they no longer have the monopoly on information. If they did, they wouldnt touch it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-05 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. Everybody loves "the sex" n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not_Giving_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-05 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. Leslie Stahl was on Bill Maher last night
While Bill was saying that Jimmy-Jeff had a boyfriend in the WH, Leslie was pointing out the security part. How DID he get a press pass under a phony name? HELLO! Biden said, in response to a question from Maher, that only the chair of a certain committee can call an investigation, and the chair is, of course, a repub, so the odds are that it won't happen.

If MSM does pick this up (even if it's only for the sex angle initially), maybe an investigation will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-05 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I will be totally flummoxed if anything comes of this
Name ONE thing in the last six years, including the campaign, that the media has covered to its conclusion, WRT the chimp or the 43d Reich

they NEVER EVER cover anything in depth....they run something for a day or two, then drop it, defending themselves later by saying, "what are you TALKing about?" we covered that like a blanket three years ago

I've had people like Jim Warren of the Chicago Trib tell me that on the radio, referring to the AWOL story, as if they covered it in detail during Election Theft 2000. they actually beLIEVE they've covered these stories; that no holds were barred.

they have to do this in order to overcome the massive cognitive dissonance formed by justifying the existence of that feeble minded twerp and his puppeteers, especially the second time around.

they'll do anything/say ANYthing to rationalize their total venality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. MSM needs to investigate whether Gannon was created by the WHIG.
The White House Iraq Group, or WHIG, was formed by White House Chief of Staff Andy Card in August of 2002 to market and create support for the invasion of Iraq. It also was charged with framing the debate so that republicans would benefit politically from the invasion. WHIG's responsibilities included the creation and coordination of all of the lies to support the invasion, including the yellowcake and other nuclear weapons lies, and probably was involved in the Plame crimes.

From an excellent article describing the WHIG:
The group met weekly in the Situation Room. Among the regular participants were Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser; communications strategists Karen Hughes, Mary Matalin and James R. Wilkinson; legislative liaison Nicholas E. Calio; and policy advisers led by Rice and her deputy, Stephen J. Hadley, along with I. Lewis Libby, Cheney's chief of staff.

The first days of September would bring some of the most important decisions of the prewar period: what to demand of the United Nations in the president's Sept. 12 address to the General Assembly, when to take the issue to Congress, and how to frame the conflict with Iraq in the midterm election campaign that began in earnest after Labor Day.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=artic...

The WHIG not only chose what lies to use, it also chose when, where, and how the lies would be disseminated. And by whom. Because of the comprehensive responsibilty the WHIG had for coordinating the lies of the administration concerning Iraq and Gannon's first appearance at the time of the Iraq invasion, I think it likely that the WHIG was involved in the creation of Gannon as a journalist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC