Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arizona Revisits the Jury Patriotism Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 01:58 PM
Original message
Arizona Revisits the Jury Patriotism Act
http://www.sierratimes.com/rss/newswire.php?article=/ap/20050211/ap_on_re_us/jury_duty&time=1108115558&feed=us



Proving she couldn't serve on a jury this month was no easy task for Joann Paulmenn, who is 75 and suffers from Parkinson's disease. Under state law, she was required to get a detailed medical note from a neurologist and her family physician. Paulmenn's husband, Harry, was stunned.

"At age 75, I don't know why it's mandatory that you come up with a doctor's certificate," he said. "Her Parkinson's is not going to get any better."

Previously, seniors could make a phone call or dash off a note to a jury official to get excused. Now they have to get a physician — not just a caregiver or nursing home administrator — to document reasons why they can't serve.


Those making claims of financial hardships have to provide information on household income. And some military personnel temporarily serving overseas have been told to provide a letter from a commanding officer. For Joann Paulmenn, the visit to the neurologist for documentation could have cost up to $230 were it not for the couple's insurance coverage, her husband said.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well now, this will make it easier to get a "jury of my peers"
Folks pissed off at the government are my peers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. What?
"And some military personnel temporarily serving overseas have been told to provide a letter from a commanding officer."

I'm sorry, military personnel on active duty are excused by Federal Law: any active duty person may be sent on zero notice to war. Why do they need a letter from thier C.O. when the fact they have a active duty id card proves that they're active?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC