struggle4progress
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 05:10 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: Why Chertoff? |
|
| Poll result (6 votes) | | Patriot Act. Enough said. |  (4 votes, 67%) | Vote | | Because coerced statements really ARE okay if never used in court |  (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | He has such sexy ideas about limiting the rights of accused to counsel |  (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Fantastic job refocussing the Enron investigation on Arthur Anderson! |  (1 votes, 17%) | Vote | | Abolishing lawyer-client confidentiality is a great idea! |  (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Moussaoui obviously had no right to call witnesses |  (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | He soldiered gamely through the long Whitewater campaign. Duh. |  (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Why win elections if you can't reward campaign contributors? |  (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Uh, what's the big deal? He seems like a nice guy to me. |  (1 votes, 17%) | Vote | | Finally! Wiretapping modems without a specific court order! |  (0 votes, 0%) | Vote |
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread