Cheswick2.0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 12:06 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: Why did Clark lose? Poll for those who did not vote for him |
|
If you didn't vote for Clark in the Primaries please tell us why.
| Poll result (9 votes) | | Was it the fact that he raised money for and praised the Bush adminisration? | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Was it the fact, according to him, that he was brought into the race to "Stop Dean"? | (1 votes, 11%) | Vote | | Was it because he had no political experience? | (7 votes, 78%) | Vote | | Was it because he couldn't be bothered with Iowa? | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Was it because he talked like a liberal but talk is cheap and he had no record to back it up with? | (1 votes, 11%) | Vote | | Was it his leadership at the School of the Americas, known for training assasins and sending them to south and central america? | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Was it the way he mismanaged the Krome Ave Detention Center, allowing Haitian men to be experimented on with hormones? | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Was it his inability to get his message across in debates? | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Was it the insistance of his followers that Democrats needed a Military hero on the ticket and ONLY Wes Clark would do? | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote | | Was it his cheerleading for the war in Iraq on CNN? | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote |
|
Adelante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
by the time our caucuses were held!
|
mattclearing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I think if he is back in 2008, he will have developed greater pol. cred. |
|
At the time, he seemed kind of out of nowhere. I think people are more assured now that he's the real deal. If he had stopped supporting progressive causes, or dropped off the pundit circuit, people might have been inclined to assume he was just in it for the Presidency.
If he sticks around, I think he'll get the benefit of the doubt in 2008.
|
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. If he does something besides work on K street |
|
if not , being a lobbyist rarely gets you the kind of experience a party structure looks for.
|
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Why are you doing this? n/t |
benddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I was committed to Dean well before Clark threw his hat in the ring. I know General Clark and he would make a tremendous present. He certainly is a whole bunch smarter than the jerk sitting in the Castle.
|
ThorsHammer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. I wanted a Dean/Clark ticket |
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. It's hard to chose just one. |
|
There were so many reasons not to vote for him. All of the above are valid reasons not to have voted for him.
For me, the primary reasons were that he was in the military for 30 years and that he wasn't a Democrat until he decided that he wanted to be president.
I will re-evaluate my opinion of him if he is still around and still supporting progressive causes in 2008.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Jun 19th 2013, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message |