chicagojoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 03:05 AM
Original message |
| Why is the Radical Right calling Gonzalez a victim of racism? |
Syrinx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 03:07 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. because they are racists n/t |
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 03:10 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Umm, Playbook. Page 59 I think. n/t |
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 8. Is that the chapter that says |
|
...always place people of minority or underrepresented sectors of American society in key positions. Ensure that they are total toadies, who would sell their souls, the souls of their families and their heritage to have a position close to the throne. Ensure, too, that they parrot the party line faithfully, and never allow any personal feelings of compassion or justice to enter into any decision making.
Then, if they are attacked for parroting the BushCo themes, immediately launch an outraged media blitz insisting that the real agenda of the criticism is racism, sexism, religious discrimination, or whatever. Count on people being afraid to be accused of this sort of socially repugnant behavior and because of this the story dies.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. Well, it worked for Clarence Thomas. |
|
Can't believe they're proud of that one.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
It's indexed in the back under Clarence Thomas I think.
|
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
cornermouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 03:12 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. How can they possibly defend him without making |
|
something up? Its not like they can use the actual facts about him and the decisions that he's made...
|
Erika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 03:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They haven't offered him a quarter of a mil for promoting Bush's agenda? Racial discrimination?
|
Pam-Moby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 04:09 AM
Response to Original message |
| 5. They have been taking their |
|
instructions from my pet goat book.
|
JohnnyRingo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 04:09 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. The same theory that labels anti-war advocates "traitors". |
|
Edited on Sat Jan-08-05 04:09 AM by JohnnyRingo
Enviromentalists as "tree-hugging liberals". And civil rights lawyers as "ambulance chasers".
|
d_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 04:14 AM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Up is down. Slavery is freedom. War is peace. |
Pepperbelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 07:16 AM
Response to Original message |
| 9. because they have no fundamental understanding of the term. |
|
They think that if you say anything bad about a person of some ethnic makeup other than caucasion, they can divert attention from the criticism with this claim. Whether it from ignorance or whether it is on purpose I do not know.
|
justiceischeap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They all believe that there was no big deal with torturing a bunch of Muslims. So why pick on the poor man that did what it took to show them a thing or two.
It's convenient, they have to yell something because they can't speak the truth about him.
|
hollowdweller
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message |
| 12. Same reason OJ's attorneys played the race card. Protect a killer |
AlbizuX
(322 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message |
| 13. because they cannot comprehend |
|
that we oppose him on his torture positions.
That, or they are opportunistically trying to paint liberals as anti-Hispanic...which is very laughable...given that I'm Latino and I've always felt Republicans to be more anti-Hispanic than Democrats.
|
youngred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
| 14. turning things on their heads |
|
because if you say the reason for the opposition is racism then you don't have to acknowledge the fact that he isn't qualified and a bad candidate but you can smear the opposition into getting what you want.
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
| 15. Is this a trick question? nt |
tngledwebb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message |
| 16. Worked with Clarence T. didn't it? |
|
These evildoers have been around the block, remember? They have plenty of practice AND the MSM.
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
| 17. It's their usual trick |
|
The Democrats are known as the party that advocates the rights of minority groups. Therefore, the Republicanites think they're being oh, so clever when they nominate the most corrupt, right-wing woman/African-American/Latino/Asian-American/Native American/GLBT person they can find, someone who has an absolutely stinking record.
When the Dems object to this person on the basis of his/her stinkiness, the Republicanites turn around and say archly, "Oh, but we thought you liked minorities. I guess you like minorities only if they toe your liberal line." (Italicized words spoken with the sneer turned up a notch).
I've seen that tactic so many times (most notoriously with the nomination of Clarence Thomas) that I almost expect it.
|
mattclearing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 18. Yeah. They want to polarize the hispanic vote against Dems. |
|
Should be fun to watch this one. What an amazingly dumb idea.
|
MsConduct
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 19. Because when all else fails, play the race card. n/t |
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that Colin Powell, Condi Rice, and Clarence Thomas don't suck because they're black, they suck because, well, they suck.
It's the same for Gonzales.
Mr. School-of-the-Americas-School-of-Law sucks. It's that simple.
|
CatholicEdHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 22. They suck because of their actions |
|
not race or anything else. Call it a flip-flop on Affirmative Action.
|
TankLV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 23. It's called "projection". |
|
They are projecting their own beliefs on others.
Classic operating method of repukes.
|
Telly Savalas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 24. Because they're a bunch of fucking whiners. That's why. |
|
"Whaa whaa whaa, you don't like our fascist nominee, y'all must be racists. Whaa whaa whaa." Give 'em a fucking bottle or a pacifier and maybe they'll shut up about it.
|
njdemocrat106
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 25. The reasons we don't like Gonzalez have nothing to do with race |
|
We liberals know unqualified candidates when we see them, irregardless of skin color. The Republicans always attempt to find ways to project the awful truths of their party (the Republicans are the real racists in my book) onto their opposition, and the sheeple seem to eat it up, because the Republicans are the party of "Christian morals" (yeah right).
|
GRLMGC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
Put the most repugnant candidate out but make sure that they're a person of color so they can yell racism when someone objects to them. Sadly, it works
|
proudbluestater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 12:49 AM
Response to Original message |
| 27. I wish the radical right would Cheney itself. What about Gutierrez? |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-09-05 12:49 AM by proudbluestater
The CEO of Kelloggs who is the nominee for Commerce Secretary. Is he not an ethnic minority? He is Cuban-born. I hear no complaints about this nomination. Why? Because he is a decent, intelligent human being, not a POS without a working brain cell.
|
Endangered Specie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message |
| 28. I call it "playing the irony card". |
shanti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 01:31 AM
Response to Original message |
| 30. they love to play the race card |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-09-05 01:32 AM by shanti
but only when it suits their purposes.
|
Clarkie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 01:41 AM
Response to Original message |
| 31. Because they are lying liars who will do anything to secure their power |
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 03:07 AM
Response to Original message |
| 32. Survey Says... "Because They're Full Of Shit" n/t |
Revolucionario83
(72 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 04:48 AM
Response to Original message |
| 33. Fuck Alberto Gonzales |
|
Sorry that was random, but I hate that fucker.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 20th 2013, 12:12 AM
Response to Original message |