Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hoo-boy, I'm gonna get creamed for this one.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ZombieNixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:48 PM
Original message
Hoo-boy, I'm gonna get creamed for this one.
Edited on Thu Nov-18-04 06:58 PM by ZombieNixon
My latest opinion piece for my paper. Will be published on Mon.

====================================================

DON’T CHANGE HORSEMEN IN MID-APOCALYPSE

The good news is that I can sport my anti-Bush stuff for four more years. The bad news is we get four more years of a highly questionable president as a result of a highly questionable election. “But...there’s nothing questionable about it. Bush won the popular vote,” you might say. That in itself is a little weird. Conventional wisdom has it that an incumbent president’s share of the vote rarely, if ever, bests his pre-election approval rating. So, with the famous “undecided” voters making up such a small percentage of the electorate, how on earth does a president with an approval rating of 48% garner 51% of the popular vote? I watched the exit polls in key states all day. In the morning, they heavily favored John Kerry. In the middle of the day, they were tied with a few one or two point margins either way. In the late afternoon, they favored Kerry again. All the pre-election polls showed the race tied and a majority of people thought the country was on the wrong track and said it was time for a change. Using an unrealistic assumption of no voter suppression or disenfranchisement, the only way Bush could have got an absolute majority of the popular vote was if every single one of the “undecideds,” who usually break 2-to-1 for the challenger, all voted for Bush.

Get real, people. Half the reason they were undecided was because they didn’t like the incumbent. It’s just as likely that voter suppression and fraud was involved. Take Ohio. In the wee hours of the morning, the Supreme Court overturned an Ohio appeals court ruling that barred Republican and Democratic “poll challengers” from standing in front of the precincts challenging eligible voters’ right to vote. I attended the meeting of the local Democratic party where the “poll challengers” were given their instructions. The campaign higher-ups who came down here from New Hampshire specifically told the attendees that even though they were called “poll challengers,” their jobs were to make sure that as many eligible voters got to vote as was possible. In other words, the Democrats were instructed to make as few challenges as possible. Doesn’t sound like the Democrats were trying to suppress the vote. Meanwhile, national Republican leaders stated that their challengers were at the polls specifically to challenge voters. This of course helps democracy...how?

Then there were the electronic voting machines. They were made by a corporation by the name of Diebold Systems. Earlier, during the primary season, Walden O’Dell, the CEO of Diebold, penned a letter promising to “deliver Ohio’s electoral votes to President Bush” in the election. Mighty suspicious. These machines leave no paper trail, so there’s no way to validate the vote. All it takes is for one in every five machines to miscount votes to skew the entire election. A report just came out showing that a computer error in an Ohio precinct gave nearly 4000 extra votes to Bush/Cheney. But whatever the reason, John Kerry lost and now we’re doomed. Winston Churchill once said that people get the government they deserve, so if a majority of the American people fell for Bush’s lies or if voters were too lazy to go out and vote for Kerry or if the Democrats didn’t play a good enough ground game, we deserve four more years of Bush.

In some ways, it’s a good thing. The Democrats in Congress have no obligation to be the “loyal opposition” any more. They can be as loud and feisty as they want and make the Republicans’ lives miserable. In the meantime, we can learn a few things from the Republicans. In 1964, when Barry Goldwater was crushed in Lyndon Johnson’s landslide, the Republicans got the catalyst they needed to step back and reexamine their party. They created think tanks, built a grassroots movement and remade the language of their message. They recreated “morality” as a wedge issue and then built FOX News. Now it’s our turn. We ran a good campaign, but we’ve got to reexamine how we go about further our cause. Our job is easier, because the facts are on our side. Poll after poll shows that we are in the majority. Fifty-seven percent of Americans believe that abortion should be safe, legal and rare. Eighty-three percent believe in a healthy environment. Ninety-four percent want stronger federal gun safety laws. Eight in ten think that health care should be available to all Americans. Learn these things. Make them “moral” issues. Is it moral to leave a scorched Earth for future generations to clean up? Is it moral to let irresponsible firearm usage kill inner-city kids? Is it moral to allow poor children to die every day because they can’t afford a visit to the doctor?

Next is the media. The Communists had Pravda. The Republicans have FOX and talk radio. Don’t just sit there and let yourself be rolled over. Write to your congressmen and demand the reinstatement of the fairness doctrine. Write to George Soros and Ted Turner and tell them to buy us a FOX News. Get progressive talk radio into as many markets as Rush Limbaugh. Clear Channel may be a Republican mouthpiece, but if they can make a good profit off us, they will. The station for Air America Radio (the liberal radio network) in Portland, OR, is already a Clear Channel station, so there is hope.

Take back the word “liberal.” If we got rid of all things liberal, Ann Coulter would still be mopping the floor in Connecticut. America was founded by “liberals.”

So Democrats, liberals and progressives, suck it up. Quit moping. Sure, it’s a setback, but use it to our advantage, because a one-party state is the end of democracy.

====================================================

If I get some good hate mail, I'll post it here, too.

Cheers,
ZombieNixon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dude, It's called a paragraph
check it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I looked, I think it's paragraphed, just not indented.
Edited on Thu Nov-18-04 06:53 PM by MissMarple
Rant on, ZombieNixon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieNixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Whoops, it must not have copied when I pasted it in.
I'll fix it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rumba Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I don't think you can

unless there's an incantation to add incompressible whitespaces at the beginning of a line. Leading whitespace gets ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieNixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. There is.
"nbsp" followed by a semicolon. I, however, am too lazy, so I just inserted line breaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rumba Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. doh

Of course. I knew that. *doh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Dude...its his own work
check yourself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good stuff.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fairness doctrine? How can it be enforced if it doesn't exist?
Raygun killed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieNixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thanks.
I replaced "enforcement" with "reinstatement."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mother earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Was ready for a fight....
but we are on the same side. Where's your paper being published? Is this a college piece? Your name leaves something to be desired tho...or should you be posting elsewhere? Or am I missing the point and the Zombie part being the operative word? Don't keep me hanging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieNixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. My name comes from my Halloween constume this year.
I went as Richard Nixon's zombie. If you've ever seen Futurama, and you hear their Nixon impression, well...I can imitate that perfectly, or so I'm told, so that's where that came from.

The paper is the Farmington Daily Times in Farmington, NM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike L Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Is it possible people were embarrassed to say they voted for Chimp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieNixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I s'pose.
If you want to read an interesting analysis of the exit poll discrepancy, go here:

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/111404A.shtml

by a Ph.D. at Penn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. as a long-time editor, may I comment?
Short paragraphs are always more inductive than long ones. IOW, most people are daunted by a page of long paragraphs. It's always better to break up the text. Especially at the beginning. You've got about 15 seconds to convince the reader why he/she should continue to read. Hook 'em fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieNixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Good point, where's a good place to put the first paragraph break?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berserker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I like what you said
Paragraph this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC