CONTACT ALL MEDIA NOW: Here is how the rigged this election

[AnIndependentTexan]

CONTACT EVERYONE NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

POSTED AT DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=2625708#2626012

BASED ON EXIT POLLS, THE PROBABILITY KERRY WOULD LOSE OH AND FL = 0.15%

That's less than 1/6 of one percent!

To put it another way, the chances are 1 out of 667 that Bush would win BOTH states.

Assuming a 2% MoE for the exit polls (they are much more accurate than standard polls), the probabilities are:

Ohio Exit Poll:
Kerry 52 - Bush 48
Prob (Kerry wins OH)= 97.7%

Florida Exit Poll:
Kerry 51 - Bush 48
Prob (Kerry wins FL)= 93.5%

Then
Prob (Kerry loses FL and OH) =0.15% = (1-.977)*(1-.935)

Prob(Kerry wins OH or FL or Both)= 99.85% = 1 -.15%

How did I calculate the probs?
Simple. Feed the data into the Excel Normal Distribution function:

Since the MoE = .02, the Standard Deviation is .02/1.96 = .01

Prob (Kerry wins OH)= NORMDIST(0.52,0.5,0.01,TRUE) = 97.7%

Prob (Kerry wins FL)= NORMDIST(51/99,0.5,0.01,TRUE) = 93.5%
-----------------------------------------------------
Here is the reason why they covered up the exist polls

http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/voting.shtml#part1

The story you are about to read is in this writer's view the biggest political scandal in American history, if not global history. And it is being broken today here in New Zealand.
--------------------------------------------------
This explains the need for election to be close

http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/index.php?showtopic=53
Explanation of rigging an election

As John Hopkins University and Bev Harris have pointed out repeatedly in their first field studies; I have seen the duplicitous nature of just how easy it is to rig elections using the G.E.M.S system.

GEMS central tabulator is nothing more than an ATM machine on your home computer, with all the escape routes and backdoors. There are two columns for votes, one for the plus side and one for the negative. You can freely change the opposite column at any time you like, using MS Access. Doing this means you can add or subtract however many votes you want, within the GEMS system's rules.

What this means is that the opposing rule of positive, must turn out negative. If you take away 5000 votes from one side, reversing his percentage that exact same number will be applied to the other guy's total. It can not work any other way.

In order for the fraud to be workable, it must always come within the same vote total score GEMS tabulates. So yes, it does count every vote there is always. They never lied here. But, in order to keep the total accurate, they can freely remove or add the same number of votes, making it seem like nothing happened, to the other side. Thus the other candidate always wins. Ta daa.

------------------------

The actual voting results of paper ballot versus electronic, off by huge incremental margins of votes







This was posted at DU
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1333866&mesg_id=1333866&page=

-------------
The same Blackwell that tried to illegally stop Ohio people from voting because of the 80lb paper.

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Feb04/Fitrakis0226.htm

If Ohio’s Republican Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell has his way, Diebold will receive a contract to supply touch screen electronic voting machines for much of the state. None of these Diebold machines will provide a paper receipt of the vote.

Diebold, located in North Canton, Ohio, does its primary business in ATM and ticket-vending machines. Critics of Diebold point out that virtually every other machine the company makes provides a paper trail to verify the machine’s calculations. Oddly, only the voting machines lack this essential function.
---------------------
E-Voting Machines has a Halliburton/Cheney connection. This might be the smoke and gun people right here.

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/April2004/Landes0406.htm

Former President, Chief Operating Officer, and Vice Chairman of SAIC is Admiral Bill Owens, who is now Chairman of the Board for VoteHere. Owens also served as Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and was a senior military assistant to Secretaries of Defense Frank Carlucci and Dick Cheney. Carlucci's company is Carlyle Group, while Vice President Dick Cheney's former employer is Halliburton.
------------------
Voter News Service (VNS)

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles/Landes_Projections.htm

The news networks don't just report election news, they create it. But do they also conspire to control election results?



Voter News Service (VNS) is a top-secret private consortium owned by ABC News, The Associated Press, CBS News, CNN, Fox News, and NBC News. It's current headquarters is in Brooklyn, New York. It's been around (under different names) since 1964. It's the only company whose exit poll results are used by the news media to announce the "projected" winners in races for the president, U.S. House and Senate, state governors, and select races.



By 1964, computers were used to predict election outcomes, as well as to count votes on "punch cards." With the use of computerized vote counters and the news networks exclusive control over polling data in major elections, the gates to election fraud were wide open. Computerized voting machines have now made election fraud as easy as stealing candy from a baby.



So how could VNS help rig an election? VNS could conspire with corrupt government officials and crooked voting machine companies (whose reputation for fraud and "error" grows with every election) to come up with projections that closely mirror the expected election results. Then all that's needed is some 'tweaking' in targeted precincts where voting data can be manipulated, voting machines rigged ....and elections swung. VNS follows through with its de facto certification of election results that have already been fixed. If someone suspects vote rigging, there's always VNS to say that the results match their projections.



And with no oversight, who's to know?
-------------

Aviel D. Rubin studied 49,000 lines of leaded code from Diebold

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=12961997&BRD=1426&PAG=461&dept_id=525682&rfi=6

Johns Hopkins University Professor Aviel D. Rubin has become a leading opponent against high-tech voting systems. Rubin published the first in-depth security analysis of Diebold's touch-screen voting software.

"He studied 49,000 lines of leaded code from Diebold...and found it contained incorrect use of cryptography and bad software engineering," the Collin County Democrats' release states.

[AnIndependentTexan]

1. PLEASE AT LEAST KEEP BUMPED

[Azure]

2. Exit poll data ain't going to cut it.

[AnIndependentTexan]

3. READ THROUGH EVERY BIT OF INFORMATION HERE

http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/index.php?showtopic=53

[Walt Starr]

4. I can't read that and come away believing these allegations

My :tinfoilhat: must be broken and Karl Rove's mind rays must be affecting my perceptions of reality.

[AnIndependentTexan]

5. This one should work just as well. This is what we DU'ers dumped

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1333866&mesg_id=1333866&page=

[Walt Starr]

10. I've already read that one

Again, supposition, speculation, no hard evidence.

Give me red meat or you're pissing int hte wind. Just being brutally honest here.

[Lost Creek]

13. Would you know red meat if it slap you in the face?

Computers do what they are programmed to do. 26 years of programming experience tells me that the errors seen represent a slaughterhouse.

[AnIndependentTexan]

6. PROOF OF DIEBOLD CODE IN WORK

"We know that in ONE PRECINCT in suburban Columbus, the voting machines were wrong by almost 4,000 votes.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&u=/ap/20041105/ap_on_el_pr/voting_problems&printer=1

"We know that in Broward County, Florida, the same type of machine had similar errors and was off by 70,000 votes.

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/10103931.htm?1c

"We know that in Jacksonville, North Carolina, a computer glitch lost 4,500 votes.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=536&ncid=536&e=10&u=/ap/20041104/ap_on_el_pr/voting_problems

"We know that in Michigan City, Indiana, a computer glitch caused a 57,000 vote error -

"We know that in Craven County, NC, Bush received credit for 11,283 more votes than were actually cast in that county

http://www.newbernsj.com/SiteProcessor.cfm?Template=/GlobalTemplates/Details.cfm&StoryID=18297&Section=Local

"That's a combined error of roughly 150,000 votes that have been confirmed by the mainstream news media thus far.

These are machines that have no paper trail. Is this acceptable to you?"

http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/pol/48089077.html
-----------------------------------

Remember diebold's own creator promised he would deliver Ohio and Florida to Bush.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/politics/content/news/epaper/2004/11/05/a29a_BROWVOTE_1105.html

Officials found the software used in Broward can handle only 32,000 votes per precinct. After that, the system starts counting backward.

Why a voting system would be designed to count backward was a mystery to Broward County Mayor Ilene Lieberman. She was on the phone late Wednesday with Omaha-based Elections Systems and Software.

-----------------------

Here is how they cheated by E-machines votes PAY ATTENION

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1318200&mesg_id=1318200&page=

Stock symbol of Diebold - DBD and history and Links to Republican Party

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=1319721#1319758

[bigtree]

7. bump

in the night

[Baja Margie]

8. A1

What should we do?

[Awsi Dooger]

9. You should give TruthIsAll and others credit when you paste their work

Not enough to merely include the link. That first example, losing both Florida and Ohio, is TruthIsAll's stuff but it reads like yours to anyone who hasn't already seen TIA's post.

I have got to hand it to you, AIndependentTexan. I may not agree with your thesis, but you just keep going and going and going, much more passion and energy than anyone here right now. I honestly don't know how you do it. This result has drained me. Feels like the rest of my life will be infuenced by Tuesday, at least partially.

[Dinger]

11. Bump...

Ain't no way this is over yet, no way. In my opinion, it's a waste of time to sit tight and say to yourself "I know there's something going on. Kerry's got a secret plan in action as we speak (while doing nothing)." Yeah, I'll just sit tight. As for me, I'm going to BBV and see what ACTION, besides donating, I can take. Here I go . . .

[DoYouEverWonder]

12. One problem with your 3rd chart

The counties in Florida that had touch-screens were mostly in the southern part of the state, in counties that were Democratic strongholds. The rest of the state that is much more Republican had the Optical Scanners.

The county to look closely at in north Florida is Alachua Country.

Alachua County is a Democratic stronghold surrounded by a sea of red.

Alachua County use optical scanners, yet the REPS turned out an huge portion of their base, but the DEMS didn't. No friggin way. Not around here they didn't. The REP party in Alachua County is very poorly run and couldn't even get people out for the Swift Boat Vets or for Cheney. The Bush Campaign never even sent in paid staffers here. There is no way in hell they increased their turn in significantly higher numbers than DEMS. Sorry, just didn't happen.