Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GET THIS PEOPLE. KERRY DIDN'T LOSE. BUSH CHEATED.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:40 AM
Original message
GET THIS PEOPLE. KERRY DIDN'T LOSE. BUSH CHEATED.
Of course, then, Kerry quit. I have no doubt that Kerry won that landslide. The problem wasn't his performance, his positions, his campaign, the ads or any of that nonsense. It was the vote rigging. We saw it coming. We did nothing. He promised not to quit and then went back on that promise. It's important to put the blame for the disaster where it belongs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Uh-huh. Got any credible proof? A link to facts? Anything? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pay no attention to AAAAAAAALL the Black Box Voting . ORG links
Posted AAAAAAAAAAAALL over DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. We have our proof of fraud PAY ATTENTION ALL DU'ER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I cant HEAR YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. heh
:evilgrin: LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Haven't you been paying attention.?
If you aren't looking at the posts here, check out Gregpalast.com or legitgov.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Oh, I've been "paying attention" alright...
...and most of this type of speculation I've been reading has been horseshit from stem to stern. It's high time we accept the ugly facts, regroup, and fight on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. read this post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Okay, I read it...
...I see lots of opinion & speculation - good opinion, IMO - but no facts. Nothing concrete. No links to verifiable proof of "cheating"; no nothing other than an acutely felt rant. Just feel-good horseshit. It's high time we fell back, regrouped, and surged forward to fight on, not fantasize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. "You smell like a freeper"... ha, ha...I knew THAT was...
...coming, somewhere down the road. Jeesuz, but you tinfoil hatters are as lame as they come. Disagree with any one of you for even a second, and the "freeper" accusations come erupting forth.
Well, nanny-nanny poo-poo: you smell like one to me... :eyes: :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Despite your claptrap, you still haven't proven the election was fair.
Where is your proof? Where is the evidence that Bush plays by the rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Ahhh...but it is not I who is required to provide "proof"...
...of any kind, despite your "claptrap." I'm not the one producing fairy-tail speculations that, when considered in the light of hard evidence, all turn out to be certifiable horseshit, now am I?
Best we accept the ugly facts, regroup, and fight on, as I've said repeatedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Who says I need to provide proof?
How is believing that the most criminal empire ever to rule this country suddenly decided to be fair about elections a fairy tale?

Your view that they would just lay down after all the evil they did and let the people decide whether they rule for another four more years soends pretty far out to me.

The fraud is there...we have to find it or we die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Don't waste your energy JohnnyC
Mr. Jake isn't interested in anything except slinging insults and meaningless argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. "The fraud is there...we have to find it "...
...then go to it, and quit boring the rest of us to tears with idle keyboard speculations. When you have PROOF of this vast conspiracy I'll work to see to it that you're thrown a ticker-tape parade right down the middle of Times Square. But the serious & mentally stable among us require PROOF - not wordy, factless horseshit. The onus, such as it stands, is therefore on you to sally forth, dig up those elusive "facts" you insist are out there somewhere, and thus save the world... :eyes:
Get back to me when you've completed that worthy mission...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Sounds like a good idea!
For starters, I'm ignoring you!

Second, I'm gonna volunteer my efforts to any recounts, and spread the word of probable fraud to my family and friends.

This will be huge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. No, the onus is on you to stop insulting DUers and make a cogent
argument.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Wow....
Exactly how many districts have to show more votes than voters for you to realize that SOMETHING is drastically wrong?

We have one in Ohio and now 12 in Florida. Almost 200,000 total votes found cast above and beyond the voters in the district. We have another district where 12% of the voters supposedly decided not to cast a vote for President.

That that HARD EVIDENCE and add in the exit polls not matching in E-voting states, but coming very close in non-evoting states and you have the effect of the evidence above.

To not realize that SOMETHING is up is simply not paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
32. See, your first wrong assumption is
that you believe anything that THEY say over your own lying eyes.

To come to the conclusion that you don't have to provide proof, you have to believe that they didn't steal it last time, that they wouldn't steal it, and if they did -- they'd just tell us about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. So you think Bush won - despite the incorrect vote counts
that remarkably gave him underserved votes and despite the exit polls which said Kerry won. I suppose you think Bush won Florida in 2000, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. "I suppose you think Bush won Florida in 2000, too."
You know, one of the charming things about you tinfoil hatters is that you always resort to every scummy tactic in the book when you sense that your X-files world-view is under some kind of threat of being intruded on by reality, including the time-honored tradition of inserting words in the mouths of others. I have never intimated in the least that I thought the outcome of the election in Florida in 2000 was anything other than fraudulent. The subject under discussion, however, is the 2004 election. Please try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. So they comitted fraud four years ago
before they had even consolidated power. But now that they have consolidated power, fucked over the country, started a war based on lies, weeded out the dissenters in the government, you think they are gonna play fair in 2004?

That doesn't make sense to me. Not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. You believe 2000 was fraudulent but not 2004?
That's for sayin' what you just said.
Good Goddess!:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
35. LOL -- good smileys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Doncha just feel like doing that to some people sometimes?
Yeah, Me too:evilgrin:
Either that or this
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Insults do not make for a convincing argument.
Edited on Sat Nov-06-04 02:55 AM by Swamp_Rat
"...one of the charming things about you tinfoil hatters is that you always resort to every scummy tactic in the book when you sense that your X-files world-view is under some kind of threat of being intruded on by reality..."

Please convince me that PNAC is also tinfoil hat and I'll consider the possibility that it's all a bad dream. Unfortunately, here's reality for ya dude:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Not really interested in what you have to say, Swampy...
...as I've made clear more than once. :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Obviously you are
because you keep reading and responding to his posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. And he NEVER answers with substance.
Notice the ad hominems in lieu of substance?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Because you know I'm on to you.
... don't you. :D

Why don't you answer questions posed to you? Instead, you resort to ad hominem. What about PNAC?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. I on the other hand Swamp_Rat
Think you're

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Danke!
I am a lean, mean, freeper-bustin' machine! :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. heres some stuff to steam on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerry in 04 Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. I guess he was what dumbya said he was all along.
A Flip-Flopper. He told us he would fight then he quit less than 12 hours after the last polls closed. Way to fight JK!!!!!!! WOOT!!!!!!!


I have *feeling* not a very strong one though, that the Kerry team may have an ace up its sleave and they just don't want them to expect it. Hence the VERY early concession. I mean, why not AT LEAST wait until the end of the day and see if any major fraud surfaces?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. the gay marriage amendments helped Bush
it helped get religious conservatives, including catholic latinos to vote for him. if we want to win in the future we have to acknoweldge this. the democrats did even worse in the senate races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. If I see one more of these posts I think I am going to scream...
I'm Catholic, quit blaming us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC